Analysis Of Barack Obama’s Approach To Pass The Immigration Reform 2013-14: [Essay Example], 1494 words GradesFixer

Haven't found the right essay?

Get an expert to write your essay!


Professional writers and researchers


Sources and citation are provided


3 hour delivery

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.

Analysis of Barack Obama’s Approach to Pass the Immigration Reform 2013-14

Download Print

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay.

We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

Get your price

121 writers online

Download PDF

The aim of this essay is to show Barack Obama’s attempt to influence Congress to pass the immigration reform 2013-2014, in which a number of issues have to be addressed such as what the immigration reform and how the relationship between congress and the presidency affects the passing of the bill, the issue of the importance of legislating the immigration reform 2013-2014 has to be addressed, which method did the presidency try to use to get the legislation passed, how the presidential administration decided to persuade legislators to pass the immigration reform, What devices has the presidency used to try to influence congressional behaviour and how the devices are used. Lastly how the presidency strategy to achieve the reform has changed over time.

The “Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act,” or S.744 was a proposal introduced by Charles Schummer on April 26, 2013, for changing the U.S. immigration system written by a bipartisan group of eight senators who were widely known as the collective gang of eigh. The bill covered all topics of the immigration process from border and social control problems to legal immigration reforms.

It was to create changes to the family and employment-based visa classes for immigrants, it was supposed to make it easier for non-immigrant workers to work in all sectors of the economy, and provides legal status to 11 million illegal immigrants within the United States.

If passed social control measures like unregistered immigrants will be allowed to register for the new Registered Provisional Immigrant (RPI) program before long, before those in RPI status can apply to become lawful permanent residents. The Department of Homeland Security needs to verify that the Comprehensive Southern Border Security Strategy has been set up and active, 700 miles of fencing has to be be completed, 38,405 border patrol agents have to be deployed, and the E-Verify employment verification system has to be in place.

However for this legislation to be passed by congress the legislative power (congress) had to agree with the terms of the legislative bill provided by the executive power (presidency).The relationship between the presidency and Congress has been a difficult one for several scholars as it has changed over the course of years. The further apart the presidency and congress are the less likely a political agreement is going to be agreed, so factors such as the number of president loyalists from both the executive and legislative branch, leadership skills and popularity matter as it will make the process of passing bills to law easier.

However, if the government is divided it would make policymaking as a tedious method, this encourages a partisanship approach which makes legislating bills difficult as individual parties will promote their interests which may create inefficiency.

The senate approved the immigration bill by 68-32 majority that fourteen republicans joined the democrats to support the legislation which shows a small amount of bipartisan approach as some members of the opposite party supported the legislation however the question was whether the bill would pass in the house of representatives, in which Boehner who was the speaker of the United states house of representatives made it clear that the house would not take senate bill and wanted to do its own job creating its own version of the immigration bill.

This is further supported by the fact that by stating that they want to deal with the immigration bill in chunks that the members of the house of representatives can deal with and the American people can get behind.

Obama’s administration modified their strategy in an effort to entice John Boehner and other members of the house of united states of representatives to change their minds by introducing a new five smaller scale immigration bills because of Boehner’s complaints concerning the document is too long to read which was true on reflection because the document was 1300 pages. The new five smaller scale immigration bill restrained increased border security, agricultural worker visas, a new employment verification system for workers and extra measures for native enforcement agents to detain suspected undocumented immigrants. However, none of the bills says anything about offering undocumented immigrants a legal status of citizenship.

The presidency needed to indicate that they require to use a Bipartisan in which Obama, in a Spanish language television Telemundo in which he addressed that he was not going to use executive authority to expand a 2012 decision to suspend deportations of young immigrants brought to the country illegally by their parents, because using it would undermine his credibility and make him seem like he is using a partisanship approach.

However, if Obama used his executive powers such as the veto power in which he can disapprove and veto it within ten days in which he must explain the reason why he vetoed it. This can strain the relationship between the presidency and Congress as the presidency can send a clear message as to where they stand on an issue even though it goes against a large legislative majority in congress.

However, as the year was about to end, vital problems such as Syria, the budget, and the debt limit were a priority and House leaders made no move to bring to discuss committee-passed bills or formulate another strategy. The 16-day government shutdown in October intensified the rift between Democrats and Republicans, and Congress and the executive branch, and worsened frictions within the GOP. Later that month, GOP leaders concluded that there was not enough time left in the year to bring immigration legislation as an important Agenda.

In 2014 the republicans had a retreat in which they released their immigration principles in which like the senate plan raised issues on increased border security, new workplace hiring verification rules, and changes to the current visa programs for foreign workers and families. The republicans also stated who came as children, a group known as “Dreamers,” would be afforded legal status and, potentially, citizenship.

However, the republicans declared that the 10 million immigrants have no special path for citizenship for breaking immigration laws however they allowed the idea of the immigrants working in the country if they met provisions like paying taxes, admitting that they broke the law and learning English.

The principles conjointly stressed that immigrants could not attain legal status until border security benchmarks were attained. The approach utilized by the republicans is a partisan approach due to their reluctance to comprise with the democrats over how to best deal with the illegal immigrants.

This is further implemented by the republicans by not being pleased with the senate bill fine of $2000 which solely amounts to $7 per month. The republicans also realised that the conditions they mentioned such as paying taxes will be very difficult to enforce and lastly the conditions for passing the criminal background check includes a major loophole.

The immigration bill required a commitment to fiscal responsibility, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) approximates that the bill will save about $135 billion during throughout the primary decade of implementation, a figure that concerned the value of securing the border. The bill also will save taxpayers the maximum amount $685 billion within the returning ten years. That is a savings of almost $1 trillion ($820 billion) over twenty years. Moreover, the CBO approximates that the Senate bill pledged to reduce illegal immigration from one-third to one-half in the ten years following its enactment. The Republicans however refused this bill due to them not wanting to lose their country to immigrants.

The presidency chances of getting the immigration passed reduced drastically when in June 2014 Eric Cantor lost the Republican primary election to Dave Brat. It was a loss that many advocates believed that spoiled the remaining hopes among immigration advocates because David Brat did not share the same views on immigration issues.

Individuals who have worked under Cantor however noted that he supported the notion of fixing the immigration system however through small-scale issues such as border security and legal status for young undocumented immigrants.

This is the reason why Cantor lost the Republican primary to Dave Brat because he failed to convince his party that he had the same notions of immigration system as they do. This shows a chance for a bipartisan approach to be adopted by both the presidency and congress wasted and it furthers the notion of partisan approach especially on the side of congress.

In conclusion the presidency tried using a bipartisan approach to pass the immigration reform however due to the presidency and congress conflicting interests especially in the house of representatives using a bipartisan approach became difficult to put in actuality, this is because the house of representatives which was basically republicans did not Want to grant illegal immigrants citizenship due to factors such as it came with a huge fiscal responsibility, uncertainty of accurate information of immigrant background checks. However other factors such as the budget and debt ceiling took precedence and made the immigration reform not a top priority agenda for congress. All this encouraged the partisan approach and the reform did not pass.

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student.

Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

100% plagiarism free

Sources and citations are provided

Find Free Essays

We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Analysis Of Barack Obama’s Approach To Pass The Immigration Reform 2013-14. (2020, September 01). GradesFixer. Retrieved October 31, 2020, from
“Analysis Of Barack Obama’s Approach To Pass The Immigration Reform 2013-14.” GradesFixer, 01 Sept. 2020,
Analysis Of Barack Obama’s Approach To Pass The Immigration Reform 2013-14. [online]. Available at: <> [Accessed 31 Oct. 2020].
Analysis Of Barack Obama’s Approach To Pass The Immigration Reform 2013-14 [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2020 Sept 01 [cited 2020 Oct 31]. Available from:
copy to clipboard

Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you’d like this or any other sample, we’ll happily email it to you.

    By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails.


    Attention! this essay is not unique. You can get 100% plagiarism FREE essay in 30sec

    Recieve 100% plagiarism-Free paper just for 4.99$ on email
    get unique paper
    *Public papers are open and may contain not unique content
    download public sample

    Sorry, we cannot unicalize this essay. You can order Unique paper and our professionals Rewrite it for you



    Your essay sample has been sent.

    Want us to write one just for you? We can custom edit this essay into an original, 100% plagiarism free essay.

    thanks-icon Order now

    Hi there!

    Are you interested in getting a customized paper?

    Check it out!
    Having trouble finding the perfect essay? We’ve got you covered. Hire a writer uses cookies. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.