Analysis Of Trade Secrets Protection And Misrepresentation Between Uber And Waymo: [Essay Example], 529 words GradesFixer

Haven't found the right essay?

Get an expert to write your essay!


Professional writers and researchers


Sources and citation are provided


3 hour delivery

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.

Analysis Of Trade Secrets Protection And Misrepresentation Between Uber And Waymo

Download Print

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay.

We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

Get your price

121 writers online

Download PDF

This case allowed me to examine the legal and ethical issues about trade secret protection and misrepresentation between two establishments, Uber and Waymo. Trade Secrets are valuable information used in the conduct of a business that isn’t commonly known by others. According to Lockean view, it is also considered as a form of intellectual property ownership whereby an inventor working for a company that manufactures the invention; the company becomes the rightful owner of the invention. (Pearson, 2012). Uber and Waymo legal action over driverless cars signifies the importance for company’s right to protect their trade secrets. Such information should ultimately be kept a secret to combat the contingency of theft and improper disclosure.

Therefore, employees are obligated to practice confidentiality by not disclosing or using any information acquired during their employment to manufacture anything or even provided as a service to others. With this being said, it is essential that trade secrets be protected at all time because it allows a business to be at a competitive advantage over competitors, since their proprietary information adds significant value towards the survival of their business. Nonetheless, I support the sentiment that employees are free to move from one job to the next as they choose and or even start their own business. My reasons for affiliating with this sentiment derived from two ethical theories; utilitarianism perspective and virtue of ethics perspective. As it relates to the utilitarianism perspective, an action is right if and only if it produces the greatest balance of pleasure over pain for everyone which determines right from wrong by focusing on the outcomes of the action (a form of consequentialism) (Pearson, 2012).

As such, Uber and Waymo situation can be justified using this theory because it is the most ethical alternative that will produce the greatest outcome of good for everyone. Also, from a business standpoint, it is the most prevalent and defensible approach for moral reasoning in terms of costs and benefits for all. On the other hand, bearing in mind that one cannot predict the future, uncertainty may arise from the consequences of one’s action. In addition, virtue of ethics theory deals with ethics of character; the kind of person that one should be in society. This perspective focuses directly on individual’s moral character as opposed to rights of an action. It is known that the virtues of a good businessman are the same as those of a good person (Solomon) (Pearson, 2012). With regards to Uber and Waymo situation, it can be justified using this theory, “traditionally going back to Aristotle, virtue ethics has tried to ground itself on a teleological basis” (Nussbaum 2000). However, Mr. Levandowski’s actions that manifested insinuates his true reflection of who he is as an individual where he indicated that he did not committed the offense of dishonesty and misrepresentation.

In order for the trade secrets protection, information must be known only by its owner and respective authorized personnel(s). Furthermore, the implementation of a confidentiality agreement should be signed by relevant employees who have been provided with such critical information. In doing so, employers can maintain secrecy of valuable information consequently protecting their business from adverse situations in the near future.

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student.

Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

100% plagiarism free

Sources and citations are provided

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

GradesFixer. (2020). Analysis Of Trade Secrets Protection And Misrepresentation Between Uber And Waymo. Retrived from
GradesFixer. "Analysis Of Trade Secrets Protection And Misrepresentation Between Uber And Waymo." GradesFixer, 12 Apr. 2020,
GradesFixer, 2020. Analysis Of Trade Secrets Protection And Misrepresentation Between Uber And Waymo. [online] Available at: <> [Accessed 14 July 2020].
GradesFixer. Analysis Of Trade Secrets Protection And Misrepresentation Between Uber And Waymo [Internet]. GradesFixer; 2020 [cited 2020 April 12]. Available from:
copy to clipboard

Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you’d like this or any other sample, we’ll happily email it to you.

    By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails.


    Attention! this essay is not unique. You can get 100% plagiarism FREE essay in 30sec

    Recieve 100% plagiarism-Free paper just for 4.99$ on email
    get unique paper
    *Public papers are open and may contain not unique content
    download public sample

    Sorry, we cannot unicalize this essay. You can order Unique paper and our professionals Rewrite it for you



    Your essay sample has been sent.

    Want us to write one just for you? We can custom edit this essay into an original, 100% plagiarism free essay.

    thanks-icon Order now

    Hi there!

    Are you interested in getting a customized paper?

    Check it out!
    Having trouble finding the perfect essay? We’ve got you covered. Hire a writer uses cookies. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.