The Concept of Conformity and Its Main Principles

Introduction

In contemporary society, the issue of conformity and its underlying principles has emerged as a contentious topic worldwide. Conformity involves the inclination to align one's attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors with the aim of fitting into a group, making it a pervasive aspect of human life often characterized by social pressure or subtle, unconscious influence. The concept of conformity resonates deeply with most individuals, including myself, owing to the intricate interplay of cultural and social dynamics that have significantly shaped our lives.

The Transcendentalist movement

The Transcendentalist movement, which took root during the nineteenth century, played a pivotal role in catalyzing discussions around conformity and its implications. This American literary, political, and philosophical movement, led by the renowned essayist, lecturer, and poet Ralph Waldo Emerson, emerged during an era marked by critical assessments of societal norms and the prevailing culture of mindless conformity. The Transcendentalist movement, in contrast, sought to inspire individuals to establish a unique connection with the world and challenge the prevailing state of conventional thinking.

Central to the Transcendentalist movement was Ralph Waldo Emerson, a figurehead whose influence loomed large. His essay titled "Self-Reliance," penned in 1841, remains a powerful source of inspiration. In this essay, Emerson implores individuals to examine their relationship with Nature and God. He places immense emphasis on the imperative of resisting conformity and, above all else, trusting one's own judgment and instincts. Within "Self-Reliance," Emerson proffers several phrases open to various interpretations. Two pivotal statements, "envy is ignorance" and "imitation is suicide," hold particular significance. In my interpretation, Emerson underscores how jealousy equates to ignorance, given its inherent inability to recognize one's own potential and the manifold blessings in one's life. Moreover, I believe Emerson conveys the idea that emulating someone else in any capacity amounts to forsaking one's innate individuality, a divine gift bestowed by God. Essentially, he contends that such imitation constitutes a form of self-annihilation, the obliteration of one's true identity.

The Main Factors of Conformity

Cultural dynamics

Cultural dynamics constitute a compelling factor contributing to conformity among individuals. Most people are deeply embedded within a specific cultural framework, bound by the expectations of adhering to established traditions and norms. Deviating from these cultural conventions can often lead to scrutiny and judgment by others who share the same cultural background. Personally, as someone with a Pakistani heritage, I grapple with various expectations and norms on a daily basis. For instance, a prevalent norm within our culture dictates the wearing of traditional ethnic clothing during family gatherings and social events. During such occasions, I feel a compelling obligation to conform by donning ethnic attire. My rationale is rooted in the fear that failing to conform will subject me to scrutiny and judgment from those within my cultural milieu.

Social dynamics

Another significant factor contributing to individuals' conformity is the influence of social dynamics. As a teenager, I can attest that many adolescents conform in various ways, especially when seeking acceptance within a specific peer group. The desire to fit in often leads us to modify our behavior or preferences to align with the group's norms. For instance, during the holiday season in December, I participate in secret Santa exchanges with my friends, even though I do not personally celebrate Christmas. This illustrates an instance of conformity driven by social dynamics. My fear is that abstaining from such activities might exclude me from the group I wish to belong to. This inclination to conform, rooted in our yearning for acceptance, highlights the pervasive nature of conformity in our daily lives.

Personal Reflection

Drawing from personal experiences with conformity, I find myself in partial agreement with Emerson's perspectives on the subject. I concur with his notion that individuals should strive to avoid conformity to the best of their ability and should instead follow their unique desires and paths in life. I appreciate his encouragement for people to forge their distinct connection with the world. However, I also believe that Emerson's stance may veer towards an extreme. He advocated that external factors such as religion and society should exert no influence on people's behavior. Yet, I contend that these influences are instrumental in shaping societal norms that underpin a successful and well-functioning society. For instance, I see no harm in aspiring to emulate one's own parents, who often serve as role models for their children. Such emulation should be encouraged without subjecting individuals to criticism. Moreover, I believe that if individuals are prone to criticizing others for adhering to these ordinary principles, it could potentially undermine societal cohesion. In essence, while I concur that conformity in terms of personality, character, or identity should be discouraged, I emphasize the importance of upholding civility and societal norms.

Conclusion

In conclusion, conformity and its underlying principles remain a contentious topic in today's world. Conformity, characterized by the tendency to align one's attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors to fit into a group, possesses the potential to erode one's individuality. This topic resonates with a wide spectrum of individuals, including myself. The Transcendentalist movement, which encouraged individuals to resist conformity and discover their unique relationship with the world, has played a significant role in shaping the discourse around conformity. Ralph Waldo Emerson, a prominent figure in the Transcendentalist movement, inspired people to challenge the prevailing state of collective thinking. His message serves as a poignant reminder that individuals should embrace the unique qualities bestowed upon them by God and focus on the positive aspects of life rather than succumbing to negative influences.

Works Cited

1. Emerson, R. W. (1841). Self-Reliance. In Essays: First Series. Boston: James Munroe and Company.
2. Colacurcio, M. J. (2014). Emerson's Essays: The Cultural Politics of Self-Reliance. Cambridge University Press.
3. Tolchin, K. S. (2000). Unpopular Culture: The Ritual of Complaint in a British Settlement. University of Chicago Press.
4. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.
5. Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2008). Does Culture Influence What and How We Think? Effects of Priming Individualism and Collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 311-342.
6. Reicher, S. (2001). The Psychology of Crowd Dynamics. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes (pp. 182-208). Blackwell.
7. Miller, R. W. (2010). Children as Friendships: The Roots of Social Engagement. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(1), 39-51.