close
test_template

Evaluation of The 1984 Child Protection Act and Keith Jacobson's Case of Procurement of Prohibited Uncensored Material

About this sample

About this sample

close

Words: 701 |

Pages: 2|

4 min read

Published: Feb 12, 2019

Words: 701|Pages: 2|4 min read

Published: Feb 12, 2019

Late in the evening on the night of February 22nd 1984, Keith Jacobson ordered two explicit magazines for his personal leisure. These two publications ordered were titled "Bare Boys 1" and "Bare Boys 2" from a California based adult novelty shop. Keith Jacobson claims is that he did not know that these two publications included pre-teen nudity of young boys which violated the provision of the Child Protection Act of 1984. Only ninety days after Jacobson received the illegally explicit magazines the law banned all types of pornography of underage children. What interests me the most of this Supreme Court Decision was the government originated entrapment that ultimately decided Jacobson's Guilt.

'Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned'?

During the time the nude publications were ordered by Jacobson the act of viewing child pornographic material was permitted, or in Jacobson's case - not yet attended to. Subsequently, the Child Protection Act of 1984 made the acceptance of any mailing with sexually explicit children illegal. When Agents found Jacobson's name on the bookstore mailing list, two Government agencies sent mail to him through five fabricated organizations and a phony pen pal, to investigate his willingness to break the law.

Receiving the fabricated government mailing for over two years, Jacobson eventually let into his personal explicit interest and ordered a bogus publication which would have included under age teenage boys involved in sexual activities. He was arrested after a controlled delivery of the magazine, but a search of his house revealed no materials other than those sent by the Government and the Bare Boys magazines.

During Jacobson's trial he pleaded entrapment and testified that he had been curious to know the type of sexual actions to which the last letter referred and that he had been shocked by the Bare Boys magazines because he had not expected to receive photographs of minors. He was convicted, and the Court of Appeals confirmed.

The main issue in this Supreme Court decision that caught many peoples attention including my self includes many factors that seem unjustified. The time Jacobson purchased the magazines they were legal. The government intended for Jacobson to fall into many different counterfeit organizations to trap him into shame. For the jury the question they were faced with was whether Jacobson willingly committed himself into an illegal activity, or was he unlawfully tricked by the Government's sting operation.

From the Governments point of view, Jacobson's indictment does not include Jacobson's personal psychological fantasies, yet rather that act of physically willing to break the law as he attempted to receive the illegal material of minors. For the ones who oppose the indictment, their decision was made with the design that Keith Jacobson was the unwary citizen. Who also believe that Jacobson may have not even ordered the illegal material if he was not exposed to the opportunity as often as the fabricated mailings were received at Jacobson's residence.

Due to the Supreme Court hearing taking effect in the early nineties, the idea of a homosexual was not nearly as open or accepted in society as today's standard of an ideological acceptance. Keith Jacobson had a great disadvantage. Not only was he curious in homosexuality, but he was also inclined to view underage nudity and explicit material. For the general public he was labeled as a pedophile or a possible rapist therefore greatly decreasing his chance for any public support.

Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.

With the shame and misfortune weighing down on Jacobson's shoulders, Keith Jacobson ultimately lost the court battle with a 5 - 4 decision. Not only did Jacobson lose the court battle, he also lost the dignity for the rest of his life. Keith Jacobson will always be known as the homosexual pedophile. Was it really fair? Would someone's personal intimate fantasies be adequate evidence to be labeled as a crude criminal? When is it justifiable for police and governmental protection services to use aggressive acts of entrapment? These are the questions that were raised in the early 1990's as this case was underway. The topics were very personal, therefore also making a notable Supreme Court Case as the undercover police actions that brought Jacobson to his conviction - could also unknowingly happen to anyone else.

Image of Dr. Oliver Johnson
This essay was reviewed by
Dr. Oliver Johnson

Cite this Essay

Evaluation of the 1984 Child Protection Act and Keith Jacobson’s Case of Procurement of Prohibited Uncensored Material. (2019, February 12). GradesFixer. Retrieved March 29, 2024, from https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/evaluation-of-the-1984-child-protection-act-and-keith-jacobsons-case-of-procurement-of-prohibited-uncensored-material/
“Evaluation of the 1984 Child Protection Act and Keith Jacobson’s Case of Procurement of Prohibited Uncensored Material.” GradesFixer, 12 Feb. 2019, gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/evaluation-of-the-1984-child-protection-act-and-keith-jacobsons-case-of-procurement-of-prohibited-uncensored-material/
Evaluation of the 1984 Child Protection Act and Keith Jacobson’s Case of Procurement of Prohibited Uncensored Material. [online]. Available at: <https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/evaluation-of-the-1984-child-protection-act-and-keith-jacobsons-case-of-procurement-of-prohibited-uncensored-material/> [Accessed 29 Mar. 2024].
Evaluation of the 1984 Child Protection Act and Keith Jacobson’s Case of Procurement of Prohibited Uncensored Material [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2019 Feb 12 [cited 2024 Mar 29]. Available from: https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/evaluation-of-the-1984-child-protection-act-and-keith-jacobsons-case-of-procurement-of-prohibited-uncensored-material/
copy
Keep in mind: This sample was shared by another student.
  • 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
  • Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours
Write my essay

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

close

Where do you want us to send this sample?

    By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

    close

    Be careful. This essay is not unique

    This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

    Download this Sample

    Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

    close

    Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

    close

    Thanks!

    Please check your inbox.

    We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

    clock-banner-side

    Get Your
    Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

    exit-popup-close
    We can help you get a better grade and deliver your task on time!
    • Instructions Followed To The Letter
    • Deadlines Met At Every Stage
    • Unique And Plagiarism Free
    Order your paper now