How Do You Know Anything?: [Essay Example], 856 words GradesFixer
exit-popup-close

Haven't found the right essay?

Get an expert to write your essay!

exit-popup-print

Professional writers and researchers

exit-popup-quotes

Sources and citation are provided

exit-popup-clock

3 hour delivery

exit-popup-persone
close
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.

How Do You Know Anything?

Download Print

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay.

We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

Get your price

121 writers online

blank-ico
Download PDF

In their study “Social networking online and personality of self worth: a meta-analysis,” Dong Liu and Roy F. Baumeister analyze the effects social media and social networking has on certain aspects of human behavior, as shown by several studies. The first aspect described in this meta -analysis discusses the effects of social networking systems on communication between people (Liu, Baumeister). They discuss the presentation of personal information online and how that is what the majority of SNS, social networking site, is used for (Liu, Baumeister). That entire idea relates to the fact that people can obtain information about one another via the internet instantaneously, which eliminates the need for conversation. This, as Kross found, would be extremely appealing to more introverted and potentially lonelier people.

To continue, this idea relates to the other research, Schlenker and Leary’s research, that Liu and Baumeister talk about because Schlenker and Leary explain that people who are held back by fear and anxiety might spend more time online because they are behind a screen, rather than with people (Liu, Baumeister). They express that, in regards to those dealing with social anxiety, “SNS solve this problem to some extent for them,” because they are able to interact with others through anonymity (Liu, Baumeister). Furthermore, the Liu and Baumeister analyze the different behaviors on SNS and the different forms of usage that were measured in the different research studies that led to their meta-analysis. There are five ways in which people interact with SNS that they discuss, which are the total amount of activity one uses on SNS, the status updates, or “verbal disclosures about oneself,” one on one interactions between people via SNS, the posting of pictures on social media, and dinally, the declaration of being friends on platforms, such as facebook (Liu, Baumeister).

Additionally, Liu and Baumeister discuss narcissism and utilize several studies to see how SNS and narcissism are related. They describe narcissism as “a pervasive pattern of grandiose self-view, need for admiration, and an excessive preoccupation with oneself,” a definition created by Campbell, Rudich, and Sidelkis (Liu, Baumeister). They also use Raskin, Novacek, and Hogan’s idea that narcissism is connected to “superiority over others” (Liu Baumeister). It was predicted that the use of SNS would correspond positively with narcissism and that many aspects of SNS would appeal to narcissists, specifically the fact that it would allow them to gain the attention that they seed from a large number of people (Bergman, Fearrington, Davenport, and Bergman, 2011; Buffardi & Campbell).

Liu and Baumeister deduced in this meta-analysis that SNS is likely to entice many narcissists because it would allow them to display themselves in any manner they choose and it garners attention from a large number of people. Similarly, Liu and baumeister summarize the relationship between SNS and self esteem and loneliness. There were conflicting ideas as far as self esteem goes. On one hand, Liu and Baumeister learned from Crozier and Leary that many people with lower self esteem and potential anxiety disorders may use SNS as a way to meet people “without many of the threatening aspects of social interaction” (Liu, Baumeister). And so, those with low self-esteem would be more likely to be drawn to using SNS to achieve social interactions. On the other hand, however, Liu and Baumeister stated that people with lower self esteem may use SNS in ways other than for social interaction. Those with low self-esteem may also possibly utilize SNS in order to gain information about others, but not interact with them (Liu, Baumeister). Similarly, this meta-analysis discussed the relationship between loneliness and SNS.

Overall, it was discovered that “loneliness motivates SNS use,” which ties into the idea that shier or less socially activated people may be more prompted to use it (Liu, Baumeister). Engaging in SNS would seemingly fulfill the social needs for people despite never actually taking part in human relation. Moreover, in order to create this meta-analysis and discuss the aforementioned findings about SNS and human behavior, Liu and Baumeister studied extensive research and had several methods for processing such. The two went throughout articles of several studies and read through literature of the topic, then weeded out any irrelevant topics and kept only what adhered to the criteria (Liu and Baumeister).

Additionally, from the studies that they used, there were several parts of the results that they had to further explore when forming their conclusions. This includes biases that they had to factor in, specifically gender differences and cultural differences (Liu and Baumeister). For example, “the findings showed that the studies with a greater proportion of women had marginally significant smaller effect sizes of general SNS use with narcissism,” and “the studies conducted under Western culture had smaller effect sizes of general SNS use with self esteem” (Liu and Baumeister). These ideas would have effects on the results of each of the studies, and so, would have to be taken into account within their discussions and conclusion. Therefore, after discussing the many moving parts of the research they studied, Liu and Baumeister were able to gain a better understanding of the psychology and behavior behind social networking.

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student.

Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

100% plagiarism free

Sources and citations are provided

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

GradesFixer. (2019). How Do You Know Anything? Retrived from https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/how-do-you-know-anything/
GradesFixer. "How Do You Know Anything?" GradesFixer, 26 Nov. 2019, https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/how-do-you-know-anything/
GradesFixer, 2019. How Do You Know Anything? [online] Available at: <https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/how-do-you-know-anything/> [Accessed 7 July 2020].
GradesFixer. How Do You Know Anything? [Internet]. GradesFixer; 2019 [cited 2019 November 26]. Available from: https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/how-do-you-know-anything/
copy to clipboard
close

Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you’d like this or any other sample, we’ll happily email it to you.

    By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails.

    close

    Attention! this essay is not unique. You can get 100% plagiarism FREE essay in 30sec

    Recieve 100% plagiarism-Free paper just for 4.99$ on email
    get unique paper
    *Public papers are open and may contain not unique content
    download public sample
    close

    Sorry, we cannot unicalize this essay. You can order Unique paper and our professionals Rewrite it for you

    close

    Thanks!

    Your essay sample has been sent.

    Want us to write one just for you? We can custom edit this essay into an original, 100% plagiarism free essay.

    thanks-icon Order now
    boy

    Hi there!

    Are you interested in getting a customized paper?

    Check it out!
    Having trouble finding the perfect essay? We’ve got you covered. Hire a writer

    GradesFixer.com uses cookies. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.