Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.
Any subject. Any type of essay.
We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.
121 writers online
Net neutrality and the First Amendment: Who has the right to free speech?
In the news article, “Net neutrality and the First Amendment: Who has the right to free speech?”, Angus West reports how net neutrality relates to freedom of speech. Basically what net neutrality is that when someone goes onto the internet they have access to service providers and websites of their choice, keeping the internet free, open, and accessible. Angus West states, “Wu and other net neutrality supporters emphasize the consumer’s First Amendment right to access information over a service provider’s right to choose what content delivered”.
At the end of 2017, Federal Communications Commissions have voted to force a proposal that would be the end of net neutrality. Though this has been leaving debates between others at home and all over social media to either keep net neutrality or not, it finally came to an end on July 15, 2017 to make a final decision. Formal Verizon lawyer Ajit Pai “…killed the internet” said by Miles Howard. By end of this, the government regulation has received a huge backlash for the end result. This article relates to freedom of speech because without net neutrality, society cannot have full access onto internet websites without having you or your parents pay extra fees to service providers. Not only does it argue with freedom of speech but also the Declaration of Independence’s first principle, “all people are created equal”. And this is why, people who have more access to money have an advantage because they have full access to internet research that many can’t have, which everyone uses for many reasons. To either speak their minds or state their opinions about the cruel world we live in. Also for adults who work and students for their school work that both also use the internet for.
There are still many reasons why we need net neutrality and how it violated freedom of speech but the debate has ended with Ajit Pai’s decisión, that went down in history. Women’s march on Washington: “We are a part of America, so we need to be out here. This article, “Women’s march on Washington: “We are a part of America, so we need to be out here.”, Eslah Attar talks about the Women’s March that happened on the morning of January 20th of 2018. People from all over the country came together to march for women’s rights, justice, and equality. As the people marched peacefully with their handmade signs and calling out chants, while listening to celebrities who had very powerful speeches that needed to be heard. As people were interviewed, they have said that they were there to fight for equality of all religions and genders. Attar stated, “…who said the march is more than a rallying cry for women of the present; it’s a movement for the future”. The added on that the persons words more powerful, ” It’s not just about who’s in the office and who’s getting elected, it’s about what we are doing to change the world”. This article relates to freedom to peacefully assemble because the amendment “freedom of assembly” means that you are to protest as long as you do it peacefully. So the Women’s March were under those guidelines. It was just a gathering of people who believed in equality for everyone. And they “peacefully” did it without harming anyone or anything. Trump impeachment vote fails overwhelmingly.
This article “Trump impeachment vote fails overwhelmingly”, Kyle Cheney talked about how president Trump influences our environment and people with his negativity. Green who is a seven term, Houston lawmaker stated that Trump is “…causing such hark to the society of the United States is unfit to be president and warrants impeachment, trial and removal from office,”. The House wanted to impeach Donald Trump because they clearly believe that he is not a good president for the United States. Later, they were declined because of bad timing. This article relates to the Legislative Branch because the Legislative Branch means that the current president can get impeached, but only the House of Representatives can decide by having majority votes. Then it gets passed onto the Senate. If they now believe that Trump is unfit for the president role, then they will have to go through the steps of impeachment, which they tried to explain this news article but at the end stated that the proposition was declined.
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:
Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you’d like this or any other sample, we’ll happily email it to you.
Attention! this essay is not unique. You can get 100% plagiarism FREE essay in 30sec
Sorry, we cannot unicalize this essay. You can order Unique paper and our professionals Rewrite it for you
Your essay sample has been sent.
Want us to write one just for you? We can custom edit this essay into an original, 100% plagiarism free essay.Order now
Are you interested in getting a customized paper?Check it out!