Should FDA Ban Genetically Modified Organisms Due to the Relation to Health Issues: [Essay Example], 1725 words GradesFixer

Haven't found the right essay?

Get an expert to write your essay!


Professional writers and researchers


Sources and citation are provided


3 hour delivery

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.

Should Fda Ban Genetically Modified Organisms Due to the Relation to Health Issues

Download Print

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay.

We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

Get your price

121 writers online

Download PDF

Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), have turned into an exceptionally questionable theme here in our reality today. GMOs are life forms that have been developed through a quality joining methodologies of biotechnology or genetics building. This is a moderately new type of science which permits DNA from an individual species to be injected into another species in a research center. This produces blends of plant, creature, microscopic organisms, and viral qualities that don’t show up in conventional crossbreeding systems or found in nature. GMO’s have been liked to several health-related issues, and should be banned by the FDA (Genetically Modified Organisms, N.D. ).

According to Chris Somerville, a member of the national academy of science stated: “of my experience with American audiences is that most people are intrigued by both the science and the promise of utility, but apprehensive because of the strident and well publicized claims by activists that GMOs are dangerous to health and the environment. The opponents of the technology have framed the issue as black and white—GMOs are dangerous and must be stopped. That these foods are very detrimental to our health and we need to eliminate them from our grocery stores. If customers stopped purchasing these products, companies would have no choice but to eliminate them.” (Sommerville, 1201).

GMO’s have been prohibited or limited in a few nations around the globe. Some of these nations incorporate Australia, Japan, and each nation in Europe. They have found that these items have not been demonstrated safe to eat. Here in the United States, the FDA endorsed the creation of GMO’s. There is still further research to be directed on this point with the goal for them to be totally restricted from the market (Genetically Modified Organisms, N.D.). In spite of the fact that as I would see it, there is noteworthy data effectively accessible, demonstrating the hurtfulness of GMO’s. Until each and every test has been finished, and a clear addressed uncovered, these items ought not have been made accessible in business sectors.

When the United States regulators approved Monsanto’s Bt’s corn, which is genetically modified, they were aware that it would add deadly poisons to our food supply according to Jeffrey Smith. He claims that was what it was designed to do. The DNA of this corn was rigged with a gene derived from a soil bacteria called Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) which creates the Bt-toxin which is hazardous to humans and animals alike. This Bt is a pesticide, which literally makes the bugs stomachs bust open which kills them. Monsanto and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ensured its consumers that only insects would be hurt. The Bt-toxin would be entirely destroyed in human’s digestive systems and have completely no impact whatsoever on anyone who consumes it, but later studies show this information was false (Smith, 1). In fact the toxin appeared in a majority of the blood tests.

Needless to say, Monsanto was highly incorrect. A study by doctors at the University of Sherbrook hospital in Quebec found this toxin in the blood of women (pregnant and not) and also in these women’s babies. More specifically, the “toxin was diagnosed in 93% of thirty pregnant women, 80% of umbilical blood in their babies, and 67% of thirty-nine nonpregnant women.” This study was accepted for advertisement in the peer reviewed journal Reproductive Toxicology (Smith, 1). With statistics as high as 93%, the EPA was surely inaccurate. It ponders me how the production is still legal after finding their statements of the EPA to be false.

There has also been a lot of evidence that claims this Bt-toxin causes an increase in allergies and other auto-immune diseases as well. Since it flows through our blood supply and then passes through the placenta of a women into her fetus, may explain the correlation between the rises in several disorders here in the United States since the Bt crop assortments were first popularized in 1996. Low birth rates and auto-immune diseases have become more prevalent in newborns. (Smith, 1-2). There are several risks of the Bt-toxin that could potentially harm fetuses in the mother’s womb. These toxins are passed to the babies who already have weak immune systems as it is. No foreign toxins should reside in anyone’s body.

A governmental-sponsored experiment in Italy showed us that these toxins are hazardous. Mice were fed this Bt corn and showed a wide range of immune responses. These mice had increased elevations of IgE and IgG antibodies, which are commonly associated with allergies and infections in humans and animals alike. Another notable factors was that the mice also had an increase in cytokines. Cytokines are commonly known to be associated with allergic and inflammatory responses. Specifically, “interleukins that were inflamed are generally higher in humans who suffer mainly from disorders such as arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, MS, and even cancer” (Smith, 2).

Bt toxin is not a new concept to farmers. They have been utilizing the bacteria soil as a pesticide for several years. Originally this product was sprayed over plants, and was capable of removing before consumption. The new modern GM version is actually constructed-inside each plant. Each plant has its own individual spray bottle and the toxin no longer washes off. Since it is no longer biodegradable, the toxin is consumers rather than removed. Moreover, this new plant-produced version of the toxin is thousands of time more potent than the spray. This poison failed the World Health Organization’s allergen screening test (Smith, 2). The last statement claiming it failed an allergen screening should persuade your decision in a sense.

Biotech companies choose to bypass these differences between the original BT and the GM BT. They claim fearlessly that since the natural spray has been used historically without problem, it’s completely acceptable to add it directly into our food supply, with no precautions. Even the claims of safe use Bt have yet to be peer-reviewed in considerations to safety (Smith, 2). I don’t quite understand the Biotech’s reasoning to bypassing the differences. They are completely two different forms of BT. Historically this chemical was outside of the product and could be removed, and now it’s inside. This extreme change is enough to demand new studies to be done.

A very familiar experiment on GM foods was titled the European Risk Assessment. The foods and crops were developed using a case-by-case, step-by-step procedure. The potential health hazards were marked and their likelihoods were resolved by successively large-scale testings. Expectation was that the knowledge resulted would allow ample certainty to conclude the likelihood of any given hazard in monetary use, since they used case and step- by step procedures. Assessments also rely heavily on notions of familiarity and equivalence, in which information of the parent organism and the implanted gene is used to classify safety. Both of these DNA are important to have. This way we can validate that the toxin originated in the GM product and not its parent. However, there could be possible residual potential hazards, it is predicted that these findings will be reported by management and control systems (Mayer and Stirling, 1022).

I have mentioned several disadvantages to genetically modified foods but there are in fact several advantages as well. Several of the most exciting advances in genetically engineered plants are non-food related such as edible vaccinations. The genetically altered plants have the possibility to provide edible plant vaccines that could be used for individuals to fight against an assortment of infectious diseases such as cholera and AIDS. GMO potatoes have been used to deliver immunizations against diarrhea (Faerber and Edwards, 1). In cases like these, I feel the use of GMO products is acceptable. When used moderately, the risks are a lot lower.

GMOs help fight against world hunger. It is estimated that a child dies every two seconds nationally from starvation, not even taking in to account those who suffer from malnourished and undernourished. The use of this technology helps generate more and larger products. So by being more efficient more people are able to eat (Faerber and Edwards, 1). Although this is a positive aspect of GMO’s, health issues associated with these toxins will not benefit the starving populations. These people have very weak immune systems from being malnourished. They will be at higher risks of auto-immune diseases. The cost of healthy food is high. Especially organic foods. People in third-world countries do not have the means to purchase such items.

“Polls constantly show that a large majority of North Americans would prefer to know if the food they are purchasing does contain GMOs. During a 2008 CBS news poll indicated that about 87% of consumers would like these foods to be labeled. According to a recent CBS/New York Times poll, some 53% of consumers stated they would not purchase these products at all. Consumers will have this choice because foods without GMOs will have a special seal for verified products” (Genetically Modified Organism, N.D). I have seen some of these products in stores, and find it to be a wonderful idea. This way people know exactly what they are eating.

Change must begin with the purchasers and it won’t be simple. On the off chance that we truly need to wipe out the utilization of GMOs in our nation we should crush the huge organizations, for example, Monsanto. This is not a simple undertaking to achieve. Lamentably, cash directs how the court framework goes generally, so fortunes would need to be on our side. By not acquiring these items we are telling the organization we are not supporting them. I realize that I can’t change anybody’s psyche on this subject, however I trust that in the wake of perusing this you reconsider at your next outing to the market. GMOs are situated in practically every handled sustenance by the name of high fructose corn syrup. You can discover them in ketchup, Twinkies, and even bread, so BEWARE! Our bodies are sanctuaries and ought to get the supplements that are regular not simulated.

I have taken in a ton about GMOs through this exploration and I trust that I can help teach others on the destructive impacts of altered substances. There is nothing wrong with the old method for cultivating, in my opinion. I am against the utilization of GMOs in our nourishment framework.

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student.

Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

100% plagiarism free

Sources and citations are provided

Find Free Essays

We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

GradesFixer. (2019). Should FDA Ban Genetically Modified Organisms Due to the Relation to Health Issues. Retrived from
GradesFixer. "Should FDA Ban Genetically Modified Organisms Due to the Relation to Health Issues." GradesFixer, 03 Jan. 2019,
GradesFixer, 2019. Should FDA Ban Genetically Modified Organisms Due to the Relation to Health Issues. [online] Available at: <> [Accessed 23 September 2020].
GradesFixer. Should FDA Ban Genetically Modified Organisms Due to the Relation to Health Issues [Internet]. GradesFixer; 2019 [cited 2019 January 03]. Available from:
copy to clipboard

Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you’d like this or any other sample, we’ll happily email it to you.

    By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails.


    Attention! this essay is not unique. You can get 100% plagiarism FREE essay in 30sec

    Recieve 100% plagiarism-Free paper just for 4.99$ on email
    get unique paper
    *Public papers are open and may contain not unique content
    download public sample

    Sorry, we cannot unicalize this essay. You can order Unique paper and our professionals Rewrite it for you



    Your essay sample has been sent.

    Want us to write one just for you? We can custom edit this essay into an original, 100% plagiarism free essay.

    thanks-icon Order now

    Hi there!

    Are you interested in getting a customized paper?

    Check it out!
    Having trouble finding the perfect essay? We’ve got you covered. Hire a writer uses cookies. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.