By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
About this sample
About this sample
Words: 965 |
Page: 1|
5 min read
Published: May 11, 2022
Words: 965|Page: 1|5 min read
Published: May 11, 2022
The essay explores Ursula Le Guin's short story "The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas" and delves into the various themes and interpretations it presents. The story is described as having vivid descriptions with deliberate vagueness, allowing readers to imagine the details as they see fit. The narrative begins with a description of the Festival of Summer in Omelas, highlighting the happiness of its people.
However, a stark contrast is introduced when the narrator reveals the existence of a suffering child locked away from the joyous festivities. This child's suffering serves as the price for the happiness and prosperity of the entire city. The essay suggests that this suffering child can be seen as a representation of societal inequality, where some suffer for the benefit of others.
The essay also mentions the concept of the scapegoat, where blame is placed on one individual or group instead of addressing larger issues. In this case, the child's misery is essential for the happiness of Omelas' inhabitants.
Additionally, the essay discusses the Apollonian nature of the story, where aspects of human nature are depicted as rational and disciplined, contrasting the happiness of Omelas with the child's imprisonment.
Overall, the essay highlights the themes of suffering, societal inequality, and the moral choices presented in the story. It emphasizes the importance of readers making their own conclusions about the narrative's implications, making it a thought-provoking piece of literature.
“The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” is a fictional story that is classified as a short story by the author Ursula Le Guin. The story has a vivid description that has a lot of repetition in the narration of the way of life of the people of Omelas. The story is full of deliberate vague and vivid descriptions. The narrator explains the happiness in the city of Omela, but it becomes clear that the narrator does not know the details about the details. The fictional nature of the story comes out clearly when the narrator gives the readers the freedom of imagining the details as it suits them, "it doesn't matter. As you like it” (Le, 1973).
Ursula K. Le Guin has written a very dark dystopian world in the story “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas.” She makes out Omelas as a utopia where everyone who lives there is happy all because they live on the suffering of one single child. In order for everyone who lives in Omelas to continue living their happy lives it all depends on the misery of a child they are not allowed to show any kindness to. To walk away from Omelas means to reject everything that Omelas is. Omelas shouldn’t be called a perfect place because not everyone is happy living inside of it. Those who go and see the child sometimes “fall silent for a day or two, and then leave home… [walking] straight out of the city of Omelas[.]” It completely stuns them, as it also did me, to see a child being treated so poorly. Everyone is bothered when they first see the child, but then try to convince themselves that even if they saved the child there’s no way it could appreciate life because of how much it has suffered already. The child would never be able to adapt since it has been suffering for so long, so what would be the point? The significance of these people walking away from this ‘utopia’ is that they’re actually more human and compassionate than the people who live inside of Omelas. They cannot live with the guilt of knowing what all their happiness is thanks to, but at the same time cannot ruin everyone else’s happiness with their own selfishness of wishing to save the child, so they walk away into the unknown.
In the introduction, the story gives the details of the Festival of Summer celebrated by the Omelas. The matching of the people and the singing shows the happiness that dominates among them. However, the narrator shifts from the celebration and narrates the misery of a child locked in a house secluded from the Omelas. From the story of the suffering child, the idea of scapegoat arises. According to Nugroho (2016), the scapegoat is the act of laying the blame on someone instead of others. The narrator makes the reader understand that the child suffering is in exchange for the happiness of the people of Omelas. If the child is to let out of the house and given the opportunity to enjoy life as the Omelas, then suffering is bound to befall the people of Omelas. Thus, the child is depicted as the life saver since its misery makes life possible.
Ritchie (2016) postulated that allegories are stories that describe events and represents events in a metaphorical manner. In this context, the suffering child is used to represent the wealthy and the poor. The poor seem to work for the wealthy and the few happy ones. However, any conclusions about the significance and the causes of the child suffering are left by the narrator at the disposal of the reader.
Based on the context and the insight of the story, the story can be concluded that it is Apollonian. Leddy (2016) describes the Apollonian as works whose aspects of human nature are presented as rational, ordered and full of discipline. The happiness fills the people of Omelas, and the writer describes the child as somebody whose freedom has been limited. The people, especially the children of the Omelas, who goes to see the child pity him or her. However, the goodness of the Omelas cannot go to the extent of rescuing the child from suffering.
The value of this fictional story lies in the themes illustrated by the narrator. The theme of suffering as seen in the child locked up in house shows how some people suffer in the society at the expense of others. The happy ones in the society enjoy themselves while the low class in the society suffers working hard with little or no return. Moreover, on the positive side, there is love and sharing among the people of Omelas. The festival brings together the people of Omelas; they play, eat, and interact together during the festival.
The narrator calls the readers to make their conclusions after reading the story. Moreover, the narrator seems to be unsure of the facts surrounding the lives of the Omelas. The readers can make their conclusions after reading it. Therefore, it is important for people to read the story, and make their conclusions about the Omelas.
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled