By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
About this sample
About this sample
Words: 1037 |
Pages: 2|
6 min read
Updated: 15 November, 2024
Words: 1037|Pages: 2|6 min read
Updated: 15 November, 2024
The United States is unique among affluent nations due to its vast private stock of firearms. Nearly 200 million weapons in private hands are used partly for recreation, primarily hunting, and target shooting. However, what provokes the most public debate over firearms is their use against individuals during either the commission of or protection against crime. The discussion on gun control has become inextricably intertwined with the debate on the Second Amendment, although these issues have not always been so directly linked. Understanding how this has come about provides a broader yet essential context to the more specific examination of the evolution of gun control laws in the United States. The possession of firearms has its own advantages, but it can also place someone in grave danger. It largely depends on how it is used or how the fact of possessing a gun is perceived by any individual. Thus, when we talk about gun control, it essentially boils down to whether the possession of a gun is beneficial or not, as it is associated with both pros and cons.
Firearms are never a necessity for someone; it is merely individuals who overemphasize them and make them their need or sometimes even declare them as a 'pride ownership.' It would even be radical to think that if there were no weapons ever that came into existence in this world, the world would have been a better place for everyone. Throughout its existence, firearms have done nothing but killed lives. The same is the condition in the United States of America. 1.625 million: the number of Americans who have died from gunfire since 1968—more than the accumulated American deaths from all wars since the country’s founding more than 200 years ago. Guns make it much easier to kill people. Besides killing others, firearms also make it easier for people to commit suicide and kill themselves. The 'Self-defense' argument for guns is often used against gun control laws, yet research suggests that guns in the house are far more likely to kill a friend or a household member than an intruder. The collective self-defense argument that the USA needs militia groups to protect the country from the threat of invasion is false, to say the least, given the power of the US military. There are moral arguments regarding why the Second Amendment is not absolute.
The argument that guns hold isn't just about their negative impacts on the world; for some, they have even proven to be a blessing. There are individuals who do not adhere to the term 'Gun control.' Instead, they see firearms as a necessity for personal safety. In fact, firearms have their own advantages too. It all depends on how well an individual is educated about guns and their use. The Second Amendment to the US Constitution clearly guarantees the right to have firearms by individual citizens; those who dispute this are misinterpreting the US Constitution. This right has been upheld by the courts on numerous occasions. Firearm possession by individuals is vital for legitimate purposes, such as self-defense and hunting, and should not be interfered with by the authorities. Guns can deter criminals and reduce wrongdoing without ever being used. Gun ownership acts as an equalizer for women, who are then able to deter or defend against attacks by stronger, more aggressive men. Organizations like Gun Owners of America and Guns Save Lives also subscribe to the belief (a gun lobby article of faith) that society would benefit if every American carried a concealed handgun all the time. Firearm ownership by both individuals and militias provides security for the American people against foreign invasion and also government tyranny—if the American people were disarmed and some sort of tyranny emerged, the people would be at its mercy. If gun use is restricted, then criminals and murderers will simply use different weapons, such as knives.
Moreover, the argument about gun control is endless. Nonetheless, I personally support gun control. If there is anything that can ensure the non-involvement of firearms in our daily lives, I would support that. Guns have always been something that has been misused since the beginning. I am a radical thinker, so sometimes I imagine what if there were no guns in existence? How beautiful and peaceful would the world look like? I understand that people have been using various forms of weapons since the beginning, but firearms happened to be the most impactful addition to that list of arsenals. America’s early governmental preoccupation with gun possession, storage, and regulation was tied to the overarching concern for public safety, even as it intruded into citizens’ private gun ownership and habits. But the facts that prevail in society today do not match what was initially purposed. Guns are treated more like a toy nowadays, even a slight feeling of anger, ego, or any other emotion results in shooting a person. It seems as if there is no value to a life that’s greater than someone’s gun.
To summarize, as stated, gun control has its own advantages and disadvantages when debated. It can be a beneficial thing for individuals if used in a wise manner, but generally, it only results in chaos. Individuals against gun control feel that it is an infringement of the Constitution to control the sale and distribution and the registration of weapons and gun owners. It is essential for there to be certain limits on the way firearms are handled in this country because of the adverse effects associated with guns and the violence created by criminals using weapons. If the law and enforcement supporting gun control were in effect, there would probably be a decrease in the possession of guns, which would undoubtedly result in a better society.
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled