An Overview of a Long Distance Relationship

A long-distance relationship (LDR) is a personal relationship between partners who are geologically segregated from each other. Partners in LDRs confront geographic partition and absence personal contact. LDRs are especially pervasive among students constituting 25% to half of all LDRs. The long-distance relationship has tormented undergrads and individuals moved for work for a very long time. These relationships are viewed as bound to flop, however would they say they are really making more grounded bonds than a geologically nearer relationship? (Firmin et al, pg. 57-71.)

Happiness in relationships, ability to be love and to love and positive emotions, caused by these relationships is the important factors in people’s life. Even if most of the people don’t agree it, we are searching for close relationship, for spiritual moral satisfaction and for happiness in love. However the nervous waiting for her or his phone call, even deep feelings and mutual interest do not mean that the happiness will last for ever. The main issue is that any relationship requires much investment – investments support understanding, trust, effort and time. The situation gets harder, when two partners are not living in the same area. During ancient times, individuals used to build romantic relationships particularly inside their own location. Only the innovation of several types of communication and transportation made long-distance relationships practical. Furthermore, the brightest horizons are free for partners, similarly– a number of queries and challenges arise: do such types of relationship have a future? Is my colleague really devoted and sincere? It is not simple to answer all these queries unambiguously, however we will look for the arguments, proving, that partners, which are bound by long-distance relationship have the best chances to maintain a serious, strong, perspective relationship, by putting effort on building mutual trust, love, care and commitment.

As we have already indicated, along with invention of transportation and communication services, more people are motivated to make up long-distance relationships. The start of that communication is similar to the usual meeting of the two people, sharing the information about one another, getting to understand one another better. However, there is a benefit that non-local individuals are in a position to utilize– they can develop their relationship more gradually, there are a lot of possibilities to know over the stage of relationship each one of the partners needs to build.

Those against long-distance relationships always underline the challenge of sense of loneliness. On the one hand an individual is involved into relationship, on the other hand, her or his close partner is not nearby and as a cause the feeling of anxiety, frustration puts a great pressure. In real sense, there are many local relationships, in that individuals experience all the similar things, for instance, due to work one or both of the partners have to travel much, or in some military families, in which men are to abide to orders, they receive and usually can not spend much time with their partners, like they would wish to. The challenge is actually similar, thus the remedy is also similar – not to put your life on hold. It indicates that an individual should not allow concentration on his loneliness feeling, should stop feeling sorry and pity about herself/himself and the condition, rather on the contrast, should do the things, that are interesting to her or him, that will bring satisfaction, that will contribute to their individual, spiritual, physical and intellectual development. A hobby and work would be the best variables. Under no circumstances should an individual remain in separation from family members, from colleagues and from friends. All these types of social ties could make a vital contribution to preventing the environment of abandonment and loneliness. Besides, self-sufficient and successful individuals are much more attractive to their partners, than unhappy and depressed ones (Stewart et al, pg.13-26).

Another significant issue of long-distance relationships may be error in assumptions about the states of mind of the partner, about the relationship itself, about feasible arrangements or even some minor regular subtle elements. Once more, for a few partners, living locally near each other it is additionally hard to beat the impediments in true communication with each other. The truth of the matter is that lone by means of communication, which is open and based on common regard, it is conceivable to abstain from misconception, disillusionment and passionate damages. Regardless of the possibility that it is important to talk about the most troublesome question, whether to spare or to end the relationship, it is constantly better to open your cards and be totally fair. Or maybe frequently, the issues emerge, when one partner puts all his or her exertion into building the relationship and the second one is recently tolerating this exertion. This is additionally a decent topic for open and clear talk.

Presently, when we appear to have talked about all the conceivable negative things, which can destroy the relationships, both normal and long-distance, we ought to quickly say the things, which can add to positive improvement of the relations (Petersen et al, pg. 8). Regardless of the possibility that you are a long way from your partner, luckily this doesn’t imply that there is minimal opportunity to impart all the more regularly and to make pleasant sudden shocks. A pack of blooms in the morning or following a persevering day, regardless of the possibility that it was sent in a connection to your email, can light up the day for your dearest lady. A portable message, sent amid the bustling day, can unwind, if there are encouraging statements and care inside. Unquestionably these are just a few cases, in all actuality there is an incredible number of things, which should be possible to keep the sentiment alive (Weiner et al, pg.662-672.).

Distance relationships might be progressively embraced by double profession partners eventually in their life course. Despite the fact that this can make it hard to quantitatively quantify the degree of distance relating, subjective investigation of Distance relationships guarantees to give extensive knowledge into the changing way of personal lives over the life course. What starts to develop is a photo of distance relating as offering certain conceivable outcomes in connection to the gendered association of enthusiastic work and of care in conjunction with the interest, particularly of expert, professions. These conceivable outcomes may be more reasonable, notwithstanding, at specific focuses in the life course. All things considered, this new type of times of partition between partners, disclose to us an extensive sum about how individuals approach the difficulties of keeping up a wonderful and populist hint life, including minding associations with others, inside contemporary social conditions.

Long-distance relationships have been uninvestigated for a number of years. The reason is that the public believes it is not common and abnormal. Recent studies have researched on how partners cope with problems, such as stress and jealousy, but until recently, several studies have determined that long-distance relationships are not usually problematic. Some surveys even indicate that long-distance partners have equal or better relationship qualities than geographically close partners. This study was designed to check what exactly happens in long-distance relational communication, specifically in comparison to geographically close ones.

Works Cited

1. Firmin, M., Brannon, L. A., & Nakamoto, K. (2010). The influence of communication technologies on long-distance romantic relationships. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(1), 27-46.
2. Petersen, L., Kuczynski, L., & Lefevre, A. (2008). Maintaining long-distance and cross-residential relationships. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Stewart, A. L., Zeiler, S. R., & Kluemper, D. H. (2015). An exploration of long-distance dating relationships. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(1), 13-26.
4. Weiner, J., Wiegel, M., & Emery, R. E. (2003). The significance of communication in interpersonal and family relationships. In R. Lerner, M. Easterbrooks, & J. Mistry (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Developmental psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 662-672). John Wiley & Sons.
5. Carnelley, K. B., & Rowe, A. C. (2007). Repeated priming of attachment security influences later views of self and relationships. Personal Relationships, 14(2), 307-320.
6. Choi, Y., & Marks, N. F. (2013). Marital conflicts, depressive symptoms, and functional impairment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(4), 933-946.
7. Christofides, E., & Muise, A. (2009). Internet-mediated relationships: Association between Internet use and attachment processes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(3), 370-393.
8. Dainton, M., & Aylor, B. (2002). Routine and strategic maintenance efforts: Behavioral patterns, variations associated with relational length, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 69(3), 185-203.
9. Guerrero, L. K., Anderson, P. A., & Afifi, W. A. (2010). Close encounters: Communication in relationships. Sage Publications.
10. Sahlstein, E., & Stafford, L. (2004). Enacted support during relationship stress: Communication of invisible social support. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(3), 321-340.