Analysis Of John Climacus’ Views On God’S Existence: [Essay Example], 657 words GradesFixer
exit-popup-close

Haven't found the right essay?

Get an expert to write your essay!

exit-popup-print

Professional writers and researchers

exit-popup-quotes

Sources and citation are provided

exit-popup-clock

3 hour delivery

exit-popup-persone
close
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.

Analysis of John Climacus’ Views on God’s Existence

Download Print

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay.

We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

Get your price

121 writers online

blank-ico
Download PDF

Climacus is not attempting to persuading readers to accept another thought system different from their own, especially one reflecting his beliefs. His goals are for the reader to distance oneself away from the dependency on others’ opinions to allow for a margin of own opinion. Through examining the truth, one can direct own opinions towards faith.

In respects to Christian faith, Climacus does so by introducing the possibility of an offense, through the absurdity of the paradox. Climacus believes that it is not possible for God’s existence to be proven. He wants readers to use their own opinions to form beliefs on faith, but suggests that in proving the existence of God, it is imperative to remember that all proofs require act of faith. In substantiating God’s existence, one assumes exactly what one is intending to be prove. If God indeed exists, then proving His existence could be considered foolish, but if He does not exist, it would be impossible to prove His existence. If speaking of proving the existence of God in the context of proving the unknown (God), which exists, then one is expressing poorly as there already is a presupposition that he exists. If one already believes otherwise, there would be no search for proof.

The thought of His existence as false would prove to be contradictory to ones’ own beliefs of His unfeasible existence. This commits a fallacy of begging the question when attempting to prove God’s existence. To beg a question means to assume the truth of the point in contention, and in this case, the point in contention being that God exists. When attempting to prove God’s existence, it is only made possible because one already upholds this presupposition. This is because only a conception is developed, rather than the desired proof of existence. Climacus argues that it is difficult to prove that anything exists, as the demonstration can alter into something different; “an expanded concluding development of what one concludes from having presupposed that the object of investigation exists”.

Consequently, he avoids reasoning towards existence, alternatively, he reasons from existence itself. He provides the analogy of a court to emphasize this point. The course of law does not prove that a criminal exists; instead, they prove that the accused individual whose existence is given, is a criminal. He adds on to the point of how difficult it is to prove existence by discussing the greatest contention that doubt will persist regardless of whether God’s existence can be proven. An analogy for Cartesian dolls can accentuate this point. If one lets go of the doll, then it stands on its head. As soon as one lets go, they let it go. Same thing can be applied to proof. If proof is held, then existence does not come out. However, if proof is let go, existence remains, and a brief moment of “leap” occurs. This leap of faith can be applied to one’s attempts to proving the existence of God. The lack of objective knowledge of whether He exists, causes one to remain stagnant in current existing proof of non-belief. If no proof can be discovered, then one can let go of efforts in proving, and believe.

Climacus believes that it is impossible to prove the existence of God. He provides the example of Napoleon’s existence. Napoleon’s existence can be demonstrated if one assumes that Napoleon’s works are his works, and if there already is a pre-existing assumption that Napoleon exists. Without this prior assumption present, then the only substantial proof proven is that the works were completed by someone. This will not suffice in proving Napoleon’s existence. This point can be paralleled into God and his works. God’s existence cannot be inferred from His works, since “they do not appear directly and immediately”; hence, similar to the example of Napoleon, God’s existence can only be demonstrated from His works if there is a presupposing notion that they already belong to him.

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student.

Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

100% plagiarism free

Sources and citations are provided

Find Free Essays

We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Analysis Of John Climacus’ Views On God’S Existence. (2020, Jun 10). GradesFixer. Retrieved December 3, 2020, from https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/analysis-of-john-climacus-views-on-gods-existence/
“Analysis Of John Climacus’ Views On God’S Existence.” GradesFixer, 10 Jun. 2020, gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/analysis-of-john-climacus-views-on-gods-existence/
Analysis Of John Climacus’ Views On God’S Existence. [online]. Available at: <https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/analysis-of-john-climacus-views-on-gods-existence/> [Accessed 3 Dec. 2020].
Analysis Of John Climacus’ Views On God’S Existence [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2020 Jun 10 [cited 2020 Dec 3]. Available from: https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/analysis-of-john-climacus-views-on-gods-existence/
copy to clipboard
close

Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you’d like this or any other sample, we’ll happily email it to you.

    By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails.

    close

    Attention! this essay is not unique. You can get 100% plagiarism FREE essay in 30sec

    Recieve 100% plagiarism-Free paper just for 4.99$ on email
    get unique paper
    *Public papers are open and may contain not unique content
    download public sample
    close

    Sorry, we cannot unicalize this essay. You can order Unique paper and our professionals Rewrite it for you

    close

    Thanks!

    Your essay sample has been sent.

    Want us to write one just for you? We can custom edit this essay into an original, 100% plagiarism free essay.

    thanks-icon Order now
    boy

    Hi there!

    Are you interested in getting a customized paper?

    Check it out!
    Having trouble finding the perfect essay? We’ve got you covered. Hire a writer

    GradesFixer.com uses cookies. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.