Anne Marie Slaughter and Richard Dorment on Gender Roles [Essay Example] by GradesFixer
close
test_template

Anne Marie Slaughter and Richard Dorment on Gender Roles

Human-Written
download print

About this sample

About this sample

close
Human-Written

Words: 984 |

Pages: 2|

5 min read

Updated: 5 February, 2025

Words: 984|Pages: 2|5 min read

Updated: 5 February, 2025

Table of contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Slaughter’s Argument: The Barriers Women Face
  3. Dorment’s Response: Challenging Gender Stereotypes
  4. The Common Ground: Work Structure Must Change
  5. Conclusion: The Need for a New Perspective

Introduction

The debate on work-life balance and gender roles remains one of the most pressing issues in modern society. Anne Marie Slaughter, an accomplished international lawyer and political analyst, sparked widespread discussion with her 2012 article Why Women Still Can’t Have It All. In it, she challenges the persistent struggle women face in balancing demanding careers with family responsibilities. She argues that societal expectations place an unfair burden on women, assuming them to be the primary caregivers, making professional success far more challenging to attain.

However, Slaughter’s claims did not go unchallenged. British historian Richard Dorment responded with Why Men Still Can’t Have It All, a counterpoint that argues that work-life balance is not just a women’s issue but a broader societal challenge affecting both genders. Dorment pushes back against stereotypical narratives, asserting that men, too, struggle to balance professional ambition with parental involvement. Their debate highlights the complexities of gender expectations and the systemic changes needed to create a more balanced work culture for all.

Slaughter’s Argument: The Barriers Women Face

Slaughter’s article was met with overwhelming responses, particularly from working mothers who identified with her experiences. She argues that structural inequalities make it nearly impossible for women to reach the highest levels of leadership while still playing an active role in their children’s lives. She highlights the struggles of many women who do not have the privilege of choosing between career and family:

“Many struggle to find any job; others support husbands who cannot find jobs. Many cope with a work life in which good day care is either unavailable or very expensive; school schedules do not match work schedules; and schools themselves are failing to educate their children.”

Slaughter contends that women are not striving to ‘have it all’—they are merely trying to maintain stability in both personal and professional realms. To resolve this, she insists on closing the gender gap, arguing that a more equitable division of labor at home and structural changes in the workplace would allow more women to succeed without sacrificing personal fulfillment.

One of the common clichés she critiques is the idea that women can “have it all” if they marry the right partner—someone willing to share domestic responsibilities equally. While this notion suggests that a supportive spouse can ease the burden, Slaughter argues it is only a partial solution. She observes that women tend to prioritize family over career, whereas men often do the opposite. She claims that men continue to have an easier path to professional advancement because they are not expected to take on as many domestic responsibilities.

Dorment’s Response: Challenging Gender Stereotypes

Dorment strongly refutes Slaughter’s argument, contending that gender roles in parenting and careers have shifted dramatically. He criticizes her for perpetuating stereotypes about men being less emotionally involved in their children’s lives. To counter her claims, he provides both personal anecdotes and statistical evidence:

“With more and more fathers spending more and more time with their kids today—nearly three times as much as they did in 1965... Men want a different relationship with their children than men have had in the past.... They don't want to be stick figures in their children's lives.”

Dorment highlights the growing role of fathers in family life, arguing that men are now actively seeking a better balance between work and home. He challenges the assumption that women inherently struggle more with work-life balance than men, stating that both genders face similar difficulties. The traditional expectation that men must prioritize their careers, he argues, can be just as restrictive and damaging as the expectations placed on women.

He also takes issue with Slaughter’s lack of concrete evidence to support her assertion that women naturally choose family over work more often than men. Instead, he suggests that both men and women are equally capable of prioritizing their families, depending on their circumstances. He points out that many fathers, like mothers, struggle with workplace expectations that demand total dedication to professional success at the expense of family life.

The Common Ground: Work Structure Must Change

Despite their differences, Slaughter and Dorment ultimately agree on one key issue: the rigid structure of modern workplaces makes it difficult for both men and women to balance work and family responsibilities. Slaughter argues that school schedules should be adapted to align with work schedules, eliminating the historical remnants of a system designed for an agricultural society with stay-at-home mothers. She writes:

“The present system is based on a society that no longer exists—one in which farming was a major occupation and stay-at-home moms were the norm.”

Dorment surprisingly concurs, advocating for more workplace flexibility for both men and women. He suggests that flex-time and remote work options would enable parents of both genders to design a schedule that works for their families. By shifting the conversation from gender-specific struggles to systemic issues, Dorment and Slaughter highlight the larger, structural forces that make work-life balance difficult for everyone.

Conclusion: The Need for a New Perspective

Slaughter and Dorment’s debate underscores a fundamental reality: neither men nor women can truly “have it all” under the current structure of work and family expectations. While they disagree on whether women face greater struggles than men, they both recognize that balancing career and home life remains a significant challenge for all parents.

Their discussions push for meaningful societal change—one that moves away from rigid gender roles and instead focuses on workplace reforms that benefit everyone. By promoting flexible work schedules, shared parental responsibilities, and a shift in societal expectations, both authors advocate for a future where individuals have the freedom to define their own balance between career and family.

Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.

Ultimately, while Slaughter and Dorment approach the issue from different angles, their work challenges us to rethink outdated assumptions about gender roles. The takeaway? The struggle to balance work and family isn’t just a women’s issue or a men’s issue—it’s a people’s issue.

Image of Dr. Oliver Johnson
This essay was reviewed by
Dr. Oliver Johnson

Cite this Essay

Anne Marie Slaughter and Richard Dorment on Gender Roles. (2019, September 13). GradesFixer. Retrieved February 17, 2025, from https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/analysis-of-the-articles-by-anne-marie-slaughter-and-richard-dorment-on-gender-roles-and-possibilities/
“Anne Marie Slaughter and Richard Dorment on Gender Roles.” GradesFixer, 13 Sept. 2019, gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/analysis-of-the-articles-by-anne-marie-slaughter-and-richard-dorment-on-gender-roles-and-possibilities/
Anne Marie Slaughter and Richard Dorment on Gender Roles. [online]. Available at: <https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/analysis-of-the-articles-by-anne-marie-slaughter-and-richard-dorment-on-gender-roles-and-possibilities/> [Accessed 17 Feb. 2025].
Anne Marie Slaughter and Richard Dorment on Gender Roles [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2019 Sept 13 [cited 2025 Feb 17]. Available from: https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/analysis-of-the-articles-by-anne-marie-slaughter-and-richard-dorment-on-gender-roles-and-possibilities/
copy
Keep in mind: This sample was shared by another student.
  • 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
  • Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours
Write my essay

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

close

Where do you want us to send this sample?

    By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

    close

    Be careful. This essay is not unique

    This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

    Download this Sample

    Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

    close

    Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

    close

    Thanks!

    Please check your inbox.

    We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

    clock-banner-side

    Get Your
    Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

    exit-popup-close
    We can help you get a better grade and deliver your task on time!
    • Instructions Followed To The Letter
    • Deadlines Met At Every Stage
    • Unique And Plagiarism Free
    Order your paper now