By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
About this sample
About this sample
Words: 984 |
Pages: 2|
5 min read
Updated: 5 February, 2025
Words: 984|Pages: 2|5 min read
Updated: 5 February, 2025
The debate on work-life balance and gender roles remains one of the most pressing issues in modern society. Anne Marie Slaughter, an accomplished international lawyer and political analyst, sparked widespread discussion with her 2012 article Why Women Still Can’t Have It All. In it, she challenges the persistent struggle women face in balancing demanding careers with family responsibilities. She argues that societal expectations place an unfair burden on women, assuming them to be the primary caregivers, making professional success far more challenging to attain.
However, Slaughter’s claims did not go unchallenged. British historian Richard Dorment responded with Why Men Still Can’t Have It All, a counterpoint that argues that work-life balance is not just a women’s issue but a broader societal challenge affecting both genders. Dorment pushes back against stereotypical narratives, asserting that men, too, struggle to balance professional ambition with parental involvement. Their debate highlights the complexities of gender expectations and the systemic changes needed to create a more balanced work culture for all.
Slaughter’s article was met with overwhelming responses, particularly from working mothers who identified with her experiences. She argues that structural inequalities make it nearly impossible for women to reach the highest levels of leadership while still playing an active role in their children’s lives. She highlights the struggles of many women who do not have the privilege of choosing between career and family:
“Many struggle to find any job; others support husbands who cannot find jobs. Many cope with a work life in which good day care is either unavailable or very expensive; school schedules do not match work schedules; and schools themselves are failing to educate their children.”
Slaughter contends that women are not striving to ‘have it all’—they are merely trying to maintain stability in both personal and professional realms. To resolve this, she insists on closing the gender gap, arguing that a more equitable division of labor at home and structural changes in the workplace would allow more women to succeed without sacrificing personal fulfillment.
One of the common clichés she critiques is the idea that women can “have it all” if they marry the right partner—someone willing to share domestic responsibilities equally. While this notion suggests that a supportive spouse can ease the burden, Slaughter argues it is only a partial solution. She observes that women tend to prioritize family over career, whereas men often do the opposite. She claims that men continue to have an easier path to professional advancement because they are not expected to take on as many domestic responsibilities.
Dorment strongly refutes Slaughter’s argument, contending that gender roles in parenting and careers have shifted dramatically. He criticizes her for perpetuating stereotypes about men being less emotionally involved in their children’s lives. To counter her claims, he provides both personal anecdotes and statistical evidence:
“With more and more fathers spending more and more time with their kids today—nearly three times as much as they did in 1965... Men want a different relationship with their children than men have had in the past.... They don't want to be stick figures in their children's lives.”
Dorment highlights the growing role of fathers in family life, arguing that men are now actively seeking a better balance between work and home. He challenges the assumption that women inherently struggle more with work-life balance than men, stating that both genders face similar difficulties. The traditional expectation that men must prioritize their careers, he argues, can be just as restrictive and damaging as the expectations placed on women.
He also takes issue with Slaughter’s lack of concrete evidence to support her assertion that women naturally choose family over work more often than men. Instead, he suggests that both men and women are equally capable of prioritizing their families, depending on their circumstances. He points out that many fathers, like mothers, struggle with workplace expectations that demand total dedication to professional success at the expense of family life.
Despite their differences, Slaughter and Dorment ultimately agree on one key issue: the rigid structure of modern workplaces makes it difficult for both men and women to balance work and family responsibilities. Slaughter argues that school schedules should be adapted to align with work schedules, eliminating the historical remnants of a system designed for an agricultural society with stay-at-home mothers. She writes:
“The present system is based on a society that no longer exists—one in which farming was a major occupation and stay-at-home moms were the norm.”
Dorment surprisingly concurs, advocating for more workplace flexibility for both men and women. He suggests that flex-time and remote work options would enable parents of both genders to design a schedule that works for their families. By shifting the conversation from gender-specific struggles to systemic issues, Dorment and Slaughter highlight the larger, structural forces that make work-life balance difficult for everyone.
Slaughter and Dorment’s debate underscores a fundamental reality: neither men nor women can truly “have it all” under the current structure of work and family expectations. While they disagree on whether women face greater struggles than men, they both recognize that balancing career and home life remains a significant challenge for all parents.
Their discussions push for meaningful societal change—one that moves away from rigid gender roles and instead focuses on workplace reforms that benefit everyone. By promoting flexible work schedules, shared parental responsibilities, and a shift in societal expectations, both authors advocate for a future where individuals have the freedom to define their own balance between career and family.
Ultimately, while Slaughter and Dorment approach the issue from different angles, their work challenges us to rethink outdated assumptions about gender roles. The takeaway? The struggle to balance work and family isn’t just a women’s issue or a men’s issue—it’s a people’s issue.
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled