This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.

Archetype Analysis of The Novel 1984 by George Orwell

downloadDownload printPrint

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

Get custom essay

121 writers online

Download PDF

The archetypal literary criticism or in shorter words the archetypal lens is the concept of an archetype appears in areas relating to behavior, historical psychological theory, and literary analysis. An archetype can be a statement, a pattern of behavior, or prototype which other statements, patterns of behavior, and objects copy or emulate. Swiss psychiatrist, Carl Jung came up with the idea that all humans have a “collective unconscious” that shares the same themes and images which are inherited. The archetypal lens is apparent inside the novel 1984 by George Orwell thought the utilization of subjects, characters, images, and circumstances however today I will utilize this focal point and apply it to just the characters of this novel. I will initially apply this literary lens to Winston Smith which is a hero in this novel yet does not have the characteristics of one. Winston’s bravery is at first reflected in little demonstrations of rebellion against the Gathering(party). Regardless of whether it’s his mystery association with, the chronicle of provocative musings in his journal or even the purchasing of the journal itself, Winston’s insignificant demonstrations of resistance place him in a particularly extraordinary class from the hardcore Party loyalists.

In a general public where heroism never again has much importance, Winston is without a doubt a hero of sorts. A standout amongst his most drastically gallant acts is additionally the one that prompts his ruin: joining what he accepts to be the counter-revolutionary Brotherhood. This specific demonstration of rebellion is to some degree not the same as the others. Here, Winston is accomplishing something against the Gathering since he trusts it to be inherently the proper activity. He isn’t only opposing the Gathering from inside; he needs to decimate it all things considered. I’d like to recommend, nonetheless, that Winston’s most really heroic demonstration of all is his hate against Big Brother. Indeed, even after all, he’s experienced despite everything he confesses to loathing him.

Regardless of his readiness to kill Julia, in spite of his acknowledgment that ‘Freedom is slavery’ and that ‘2+2=5,’ despite everything he holds that little flash of humankind, regardless of how seriously he’s been broken, both rationally and physically. Obviously, his brave obstruction can’t keep going forever; Room 101 will see to that. In any case, ensuing inability to withstand his dread of rodents is a courageous disappointment. Also, in a general public that is as fierce and as soul-crushing as Oceania, that is most likely about as much as we could seek after. Here is a quote that identifies with Winston being a hero as his original, ‘Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.’ He discloses to us that the Gathering demands that individuals ‘dismiss the proof of your ears and eyes’ and to accept just what Big Brother guides you to accept. As it were, the Gathering controls how individuals translate truth and reality. Along these lines, for Winston, having the option to state this is a heroic move.

The second character is Julia which is the maiden. Julia is the maiden of the story, she doesn’t have the belief system that Winston detests, so in his eyes she is honest. She isn’t yet stirred and can’t see the master plan as Winston does. She is as yet young and during the time spent developing. Here is a statement that shows Julia being the maiden archetype, “I LOVE YOU.” These are Julia’s first words to Winston, composed on a piece of paper and go to him in the corridor. The words speak to a complete inversion of Julia’s character in both Winston’s mind and the readers’. Until this minute Winston has associated her to be a part with the Thought Police and has even thought of killing her.

Next is O’Brien. O’Brien fills in as both the sage and the deceiving villain. Toward the start of the story, Winston trusts him to be an individual from the Fellowship and that he bears the wisdom to oppose the party. O’Brien at that point uncovers himself to be a party member and turns into the opponent of the story. O’Brien is a complete riddle.

George Orwell brings up a larger number of issues about O’Brien than it answers. An Inner party member and a huge, stout man with a thick neck and a merciless face, he wears dark overalls, which we believe should give him a definitive air. Here is a quote that demonstrates O’Brien’s archetype, “Never again will you be capable of love, or friendship, or the joy of living, or laughter, or curiosity, or courage, or integrity. You will be hollow. We shall squeeze you empty, and then we shall fill you with ourselves.” In this quote, O’Brien portrays the objective of the thought Police in changing over thought lawbreakers. Any part of human instinct which enables protection from the party is efficiently wiped out through torment. All that is left is the party and love for the party. This condition precisely portrays Winston as the reader sees him in the last part of the book.

Next character is Big Brother. Big Brother serves as the dictator in the story. He shows up as the ever-present, ever-careful overlord of the story. His oppressive nearness quells any expectation of disobedience. Here is a quote that shows the dictator archetype of Big Brother, “BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU”. This line, maybe the most acclaimed from the novel, is seen on huge publications of Big Brother’s face all through the city of London. The opinion is both an exacting and representative reference to the manner in which the Party and the Thought Police use telescreens and sources to keep practically steady watch over everybody.

The last character is Goldstein who applies an effect on the novel while never showing up in it. As indicated by the Party, Goldstein is the legendary leader of the Brotherhood. He appears to host been a Get-together leader who dropped out of support with the routine. Regardless, the Party depicts him as the most dangerous man in Oceania. Here is a quote that shows Goldstein’s archetype, “The two aims of the Party are to conquer the whole surface of the earth and to extinguish once and for all the possibility of independent thought.” In his book, Goldstein depicts the objectives of the Party in a manner that is later reflected by O’Brien’s discussions with Winston in the Ministry of Love. The Party looks for power for raw power, and the two sorts of intensity that exist on the planet are the outer power to conquer others and the inner power to conquer emotions and convictions. The Party needs all-out control of both.

In conclusion, I would recommend anyone to look through the archetypal lens for all of the books and especially this book because it is quite hard to understand the archetypes of the characters but with this lens, it is easier to understand the book and the plot. I liked this book but in some parts, it was boring but overall it was a good book and I recommend this book to anyone.

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student.

Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

experts 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help you just now

delivery Starting from 3 hours delivery

Find Free Essays

We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Archetype Analysis Of The Novel 1984 By George Orwell. (2021, March 18). GradesFixer. Retrieved May 17, 2022, from
“Archetype Analysis Of The Novel 1984 By George Orwell.” GradesFixer, 18 Mar. 2021,
Archetype Analysis Of The Novel 1984 By George Orwell. [online]. Available at: <> [Accessed 17 May 2022].
Archetype Analysis Of The Novel 1984 By George Orwell [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2021 Mar 18 [cited 2022 May 17]. Available from:
copy to clipboard

Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you’d like this or any other sample, we’ll happily email it to you.

    By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails.


    Attention! This essay is not unique. You can get a 100% Plagiarism-FREE one in 30 sec

    Receive a 100% plagiarism-free essay on your email just for $4.99
    get unique paper
    *Public papers are open and may contain not unique content
    download public sample

    Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.



    Please check your inbox.

    Want us to write one just for you? We can custom edit this essay into an original, 100% plagiarism free essay.

    thanks-icon Order now

    Hi there!

    Are you interested in getting a customized paper?

    Check it out!
    Don't use plagiarized sources. Get your custom essay. Get custom paper

    Haven't found the right essay?

    Get an expert to write you the one you need!


    Professional writers and researchers


    Sources and citation are provided


    3 hour delivery