Comparative Analysis of Between The World and Me and Hillbilly Elegy

Introduction

The two books, Between the World and Me and Hillbilly Elegy, offer very unique perspectives on existence. One focuses on overcoming personal flaws and adversities to transform into something extraordinary and new, while the other centers on the idea of feeling isolated and believing that the world is against you. J.D. Vance, who wrote Hillbilly Elegy, is a very optimistic individual, whereas Ta-Nehisi Coates, the author of Between the World and Me, is more pessimistic, often backing down when problems arise. Despite their differences, both books highlight how life circumstances can impede progress, depending on one's background and societal acceptance. However, they diverge in that Vance actively strives to overcome these challenges, unlike Coates.

Comparison of Themes and Approaches

In Between the World and Me, Coates grapples with the treatment of African Americans. He resents being categorized and judged based on societal labels, leading to a life of resentment and isolation. He believes that by separating himself from the world, he can avoid judgment. The narrative unfolds through letters to his son, expressing his dissatisfaction with life and societal treatment. However, Coates does little to change his circumstances. In contrast, Vance acknowledges his unfavorable societal position in Hillbilly Elegy, yet he actively seeks to improve his life. He defies societal expectations by joining the military and securing employment at a young age, proving he is not defined by his upbringing. Coates' lack of action contrasts with Vance's determination to change, highlighting the impact of mindset on personal growth.

Political Perspectives

The authors also differ in their political views. Vance's quote, "Barack Obama moves at the heart of our personal insecurities. He is a good father while many of us aren’t. He wears suits to his job while we wear overalls, if we’re lucky enough to have a job at all. His wife