Critical Discussion: Pop Music is a Tool of Social Control

What is pop music? The Oxford dictionary defines ‘pop’ as “Commercial popular music, in particular accessible, tuneful music of a kind popular since the 1950s and sometimes contrasted with rock, soul, or other forms of popular music”.

Pop musical can normally be defined as ' commercially mass-produced music for a mass market'. The current most popular music gets from melodic styles that initially began to become prominent during the 1950s. In any case, this definition does not take into consideration the major part that diversely-known music plays in reflecting and communicating mainstream culture. This definition also does not give credit to the part music plays financially, nor the way that quite a bit of well-known music does not make a benefit nor does it adequately achieve a mass market. It can only with significant effort be characterized in melodic terms, as it includes such an extensive variety of rhythms, instruments, vocal and recording styles

Pop music is pop culture, it moulds the manner in which individuals talk, dress, style their hair, and other forms of conduct. For example, the way individuals behave, how they interact with other people and to some extent drug abuse. Pop music communicates to people how musical artists feel about what's going on in their lives, their deepest thoughts and in some cases their views on controversial worldwide issue. It is also utilised as a social thermometer, used to test the temperature of the occasions: the dissent tunes of the 1960s, the punk blast of the late 1970s and the r&B of today. Whenever sponsors or moviemakers need to bring out wistfulness for a specific place or period, they promptly swing to a pop soundtrack. Popular music can be the immediate articulation of the zeitgeist, particularly when it is composed, played and sung by entertainers who have solid political sentiments. It tends to be a power for the radicalisation and strengthening of youth — and can likewise be rebuked for 'the issue with youngsters'. Popular music has caused numerous sentimental hysterias in the course of recent decades. 

Popular music is additionally conceivably a toll for social control. This is on account of its relationship with mesmerizing rhythms, memorable lyrics and hypnotic lights. What better approach to understand ideology into influenced youthful minds and personalities , particularly when music lyrics and videos can reinforce as well as strengthen messages visually and additionally auditory? This is because, if popular music can direct the manner in which individuals dress and style their hair, it can likewise impact their reasoning on less shallow issues. And additionally, being 'revolt music', popular music is likewise a corporate item, and who has more enthusiasm for making ages of model purchasers than the worldwide media aggregates? Indeed, even governments are viewed as getting in on the demonstration, as state control of communicate media in spots like China races to the oversight of melody verses. 

One reason why pop music is believed to be a tool of social control is because, people around the world agree with lyrics and act on them. recently, popular pop stars have been receiving massive coverage (significantly more than expected) over the arrival of specific melodies/music recordings and music videos. What has made music videos and songs, for example, Beyonce's 'formation' or Kendrick Lamar's Grammy execution a few months ago so 'questionable' is that they are intended to feature the fundamental constraint that minorities (explicitly African Americans) look in the United States. The utilisation of verses that reference dark highlights and candidly moving symbolism that suggests social issues, for example, police fierceness have conveyed colossal acclaim to specialists like Beyonce and Kendrick. 

Be that as it may, their achievement has additionally been polarising and have brought solid reactions from numerous individuals who observe their work to be alarming and uncalled for. Performers are as a matter of first importance are craftsmen, and it is from multiple points of view their duty to make crafts that mirrors their viewpoints, encounters and generally speaking world view, regardless of whether it doesn't coordinate that of people in general in general. The artist do not have control over how people interpretant their lyrics or if they agree or disagree with it.

Majority of the time, pop vocalists are denounced for creating music that needs profundity or an incredible message. For the first time in history, we are living in an area in which diagram topping vocalists and lyricists are making music that tends to a different scope of societal issues. In this way, it has neither rhyme nor reason that individuals are assaulting Beyonce for her video which is basically intended to demonstrate that she has pride in her personality and her locale.

At the point when artists made music with political hints, they will in general outrage segments of the populace. on the other hand, paying little mind to whether you concur with their message or not, they have the creative appropriate to express how they feel in the function that they deliver. Generally speaking, I think this move in the music business is sure in light of the fact that it conveys a concentration and attention to social issues all in all and it serves an increasingly helpful utilization of the impact that pop stars can have.

One way in which pop music cannot be seen as a tool of social control, can be taken from the belief that humans have free will. Free will is the belief that humans have complete control over their behaviours, opinions and beliefs. To have is the idea that we can assume a functioning job and have the authority to make rational dictions. The presumption is that people are allowed to pick their conduct and have the ability to make their own dictions. For instance, individuals can settle on a free decision with respect to whether to perpetrate a wrongdoing or not. In this manner, an individual is in charge of their own behaviour, and it is difficult to foresee human conduct with any accuracy. 

If individuals have free will, then pop music cannot be viewed as a toll of social control. This is because, pop music cannot be the only factor that influences behaviour. Environment and upbringing also play a significant factor on individuals' beliefs as well as behaviour. An example of this is ‘drill music’. Drill music is a form of popular music in London as majority of teenagers know and recite the lyrics constantly. Many people believe that the cause of gang violence and numerous amounts of teenage deaths in London is caused by the lyrics that come from drill music. The ‘rappers’ explain, extremely graphically what they were going to do to their “opps”, the amount of money they make illegally and the amount of woman they fornicate with. They most often use these types of lyrical content.

Individuals who come from an unpleasant background and have a significant amount of anger towards society and therefore, might be able to relate to drill music more than individual who are from a good environment therefore using, it as a tool of social control. Therefore, it can be argued that pop music only has an effect on individuals who are easily influenced.

In conclusion, numerous amounts of evidences suggest that music is in fact a tool of social control. The opinion and beliefs of musicians are being absorbed by the general public daily basis. History shows us that certain songs has had a major effect on people's actions and behaviours. Examples of this include famous pop song heal the world by Michael Jackson which caused people to help others who were less fortunate or ‘fuck the police by NWA which caused massive riots in Crompton in the late 90’s. Music is implanted into society, bringing about not just the manner by which individuals dress and carry on, yet in addition in their general frame of mind and governmental issues. However, music is additionally an impression of society, uncovering a portion of the qualities that it has. Every decade has its own surface and flavour, which is communicated and produced through music. Regardless of whether it's the King of Rock 'n' Roll, who brought 'The Twitch' move to the stage; the Beatles, who helped fuel a political harmony development; or Madonna singing about virgins and separating a portion of the dividers of sexuality, performers — with their styles, verses and political positions — have cut out a substantial portrayal of what every decade has implied. In this exposition, I will concentrate on the second 50% of the twentieth century and set out instances of the manner by which music reflects culture and the other way around.

This will enable me to arrive at the resolution that music is presently the energising specialist to the manner in which the United States and United Kingdom carries on and shows up. It ought to be noted before continuing that while melodies and sorts influence fluctuating quantities of individuals, it is popular music that by and large assumes a job in characterizing a general public. ‘The basic principle behind it is that one need only repeat something until it is recognised in order to make it accepted. This applies to the standardisation of the material as well as to its plugging’. Therefore, while substantial metal, for instance, can influence a little subsection of society, it is well known music that has its characterising stake on culture.

Bibliography

• Adorno, T. (2002). Essay on Music. California: University of California Press, p.452.
• Aklilu, R. (2018). Is UK drill music to blame for London's gang culture and violence?. [online] gal-dem. Available at: http://gal-dem.com/uk-drill-music-london-gang-violence/ [Accessed 20 Dec. 2018].
• Beaumont-Thomas, B. (2018). Is UK drill music really behind London's wave of violent crime?. [online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/music/2018/apr/09/uk-drill-music-london-wave-violent-crime [Accessed 20 Dec. 2018].
• Edensor, T. (n.d.). National identity, popular culture and everyday life. Bloomsbury Publishing.
• tutor2u. (2018). Issues & Debates: Free Will & Determinism | tutor2u Psychology. [online] Available at: https://www.tutor2u.net/psychology/reference/issues-debates-free-will-determinism [Accessed 20 Dec. 2018].
• Shuker, R. (2001). Understanding Popular Music Culture. 2nd ed. London, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
• Simpson, J. and Weiner, E. (2010). pop | Definition of pop in English by Oxford Dictionaries. [online] Oxford Dictionaries | English. Available at: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/pop [Accessed 20 Dec. 2018].
• Storey, J. (2010). Cultural Studies and the Study of Popular Culture. 3rd ed. Edinburgh United Kingdom: Edinburgh University Press.
• Walker, R. (2007). Music education. 1st ed. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas.
• Wilson, K. (2018). Mediaknowall AS&A Level — Introduction. [online] Mediaknowall.com. Available at: http://www.mediaknowall.com/as_alevel/Music/music.php [Accessed 20 Dec. 2018].
• Zuluaga-Orozco, L. (2018). Pop Music As A Tool For Social Justice. [online] The Odyssey Online. Available at: https://www.theodysseyonline.com/pop-music-tool-social-justice [Accessed 20 Dec. 2018].
• Shuker, R. (2001). Understanding Popular Music Culture. 2nd ed. London, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis Ltd.