This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.

Dallas Buyers Club and Copyright Problems

downloadDownload printPrint

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay. We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

Get your price

121 writers online

Download PDF


The report looks at the contextual analysis of Dallas Buyers Club LLC and iiNET. Dallas Buyers Club is the mainstream biography film delivered by Voltage Pictures in Hollywood. IiNET is a standout amongst the most famous and the second biggest web access suppliers in Australia.

Dallas Buyers Club documented a body of evidence against iiNET in the Australian Federal Court. Dallas Buyers Club guaranteed that the clients of these network access suppliers downloaded the film unlawfully before the film was discharged. This organization asked for the definite data of 4726 clients of IINET and different ISPs who got in illicit film downloading and demanded paying budgetary repayment. Be that as it may, this method worked effectively in different ways yet fizzled against the Australian Government. The principle point of this report is to investigate partners engaged with this contextual investigation.


Voltage Pictures, the film producing organization of the film Dallas Buyers Club has the first copyrights of the motion picture. According to the Copyright Act, nobody can unlawfully download a duplicate of any motion picture from a web without consent. The organization recorded a body of evidence against iiNET and other web access suppliers in light of the fact that the organization associated that 4726 clients with these ISPs unlawfully downloaded the motion picture from Bit Torrent without having its copyright and before its discharging date. The case was recorded in Australian Federal Court. The candidates avowed that clients rupture the law of Copyright Act 1968. The correct holders don’t have any thought of end-clients who did this encroachment. Notwithstanding, the candidates just have IP locations of clients who misguidedly downloaded the motion picture. The Voltage Pictures collected the data from 4726 clients from these ISPs.

Justice Perram, an Australian Federal judge, reported that ISPs must give contacts as indicated by the IP addresses. Later on, he declined this application since Australian Federal Court found that the rights holders requested different subtleties instead of exclusively contact subtleties like pay and charges of other downloaded films. What’s more, they were requesting reformatory harms, which is illegal for Australia to give such data. From that point onward, equity Perram offered one stipulation that the rights holders needed to pay $600,000 AUD as an attachment to get the subtleties of end-clients expressed in the application by 11 February 2016. In the event that they asked any non-expressed data, at that point they would lose the bond sum

Policy problems

The Copyright strategy in Australia strengthened the anti-piracy law. As indicated by this law, nobody can wrongfully utilize or download the work which is copyrighted by another person, without their consent or without making the required payment. To put it plainly, it limits the break of copyright law by blocking locales that give access to rights holder’s stuff for nothing.


  • Due to ‘The Copyright Amendment Act’, in the event that clients are found to do download unlawfully, then ISPs would be required to send a Copyright infringement notice to the clients and apply expected channels to square sites which were utilized for ill-conceived downloading. An outcome, Internet Filtration decreases the execution of sites like Netflix, YouTube which devours a lot of data transfer capacity.
  • The learned web clients use programmings like VPN (Virtual Private Network) and Proxy Servers which can be utilized to go around the ISP channel.
  • There is one inquiry that is as yet unaddressed. Are IPS sifting 100% proficient

Financial problems

  • The strategy avoided the money-related data like which gathering will pay the expense of ISP sifting and site blocking.
  • It likewise unaddressed that who will pay the expense of sending copyright encroachment notice to clients who rupture the law.

Lawful (legal problems)

  • Should this strategy will give definite data about criteria on which ISP can choose and pick which site must be blocked.


  • Probable inclusion of site obstructing on document sharing destinations, for example, share it

Definition of a Stakeholder

A stakeholder is an individual who shows a tremendous amount of interest in a company’s business. The individual can either get affected by the market or can affect the business of an organization. Stakeholders are the groups or individual who is associated with the project of an organization and the outcomes of the project can surely be affecting them or can get affected. Thus, a stakeholder is generally any organization, social group, or individual who held a stake in the business. Therefore, stakeholders can be external and internal to a certain business. Stake generally refers to the activities of the business or vital interest. The legal obligation may include duty in order to keep an honor of the contract to pay the allocated wages (Mok et al. 2017). The moral right includes the consumer right which illustrates that the consumer should not be harmed intentionally by the activities of the business.

The stakeholder can:

  • Be affected by a certain business
  • Affect a certain business
  • Be both – affect business and get affected by a business

Types of Stakeholders and their responsibilities

  • Internet Users: Internet Users: 83% of all-out populace of Australia utilizes the web (‘Australia Internet Users’, 2017). Out of this rate, 4726 clients were legitimately influenced because of the case between Dallas Buyers Club and ISPs. The purpose for this is, as referenced prior in this report, the DBC LLC suspected that 4726 clients unlawfully the downloaded film from Bit Torrent without having its copyright.

Because of this issue, the Australian Federal Court chose to square sites having encroachment substances to avoid web robbery. Furthermore, the Australian Government affirmed the Online Infringement (Copyright Amendment) Bill 2015.

Notwithstanding these 4726 clients, every web client who was getting to such sites is influenced by these two choices. Subsequently, the web clients are considered as the significant partner for this situation think about.

Australian Federal Governments

justice Perram

  • justice Perram gave the announcement about the application put together by the candidates to charge 4726 clients, ‘so dreamlike as not to be paid attention to’ Justice Perram gave the principal ruling for DBC LLC and Voltage Pictures and request ISPs to uncover contact subtleties of 4726 clients who downloaded the motion picture unlawfully. To avoid speculative invoicing, Justice Perram connected two conditions. In the first place, the candidates should not enable threatening to the clients by sending speculative solicitations. Second, the candidates ought to need to confirm any solicitation with him before sending it to clients. Later on, Justice Perram would not give contact subtleties of 4726 clients since right holders proposed contact subtleties as well as other expansion subtleties as referenced under the heading of Dallas Buyers Club and Voltage Pictures. Submitted by DBC LLC for more subtleties incorporated into the draft letter put together by DBC LLC to the Federal Court.
  • Finally, Justice Perram proposed one condition to get infringes contact detail. In the event that DBC LLC is prepared to pay $600,000 as a bond by eleventh February 2016, then they can get infringers’ contact subtleties. The candidates did the further application to decrease bond and demand tolerating two impermissible charges in December 2015. In any case, Justice Perram denied this application and cautioned that in the event that they neglected to do further advances, then he will dismiss the application and close the case. DBC LLC and Voltage Picture chose not to continue further. Finally, the Australian Federal Court released this case.
  1. Dallas Buyer Club LLC: These are the most important stakeholder as they are the ones who have been putting their uttermost efficiency as well as performance in order to regulate the reputation of the movie. Dallas buyers club which is the highly affected stakeholders. Dallas Buyers Club LLC and Voltage Pictures professed to be the copyright proprietor of the American film Dallas Buyers Club (2013). As per the copyright rule, nobody can illicitly download a duplicate of a motion picture from a web without authorization. In October 2014, DBC LLC documented a body of evidence against iiNET and other web access suppliers in light of the fact that the organization associated that 4726 clients with these ISPs unlawfully downloaded the motion picture from Bit Torrent without having its copyright. Dallas Buyers Club LLC was the primary candidate of the theft case between Dallas Buyers Club and iiNET including the other five Internet Service Providers.
  • Voltage Pictures: These are the stakeholders who are the actual copyrighter of the movie Dallas Buyer Club. They have been the sole party of the IINET Dallas Club customers.
  • Internet Service Providers: They have the most important purpose in society as they are providing the services to the customers in order to download the movies from the internet. An ISP (represents Internet specialist organization) is a relationship through which clients can get to Internet Services.
  • The six ISPs (to be specific, Internode Pty Ltd, Amnet Broadband Pty Ltd, Dodo Services Pty Ltd, Adam Internet Pty Ltd, and Wideband Networks Pty Ltd) were the respondents for the situation between Dallas Buyers Club and Voltage Picture and six ISPs. The requests of the respondents are as per the following:
  1. iiNET Limited
  2. Internode Pty Ltd
  3. Amnet Broadband Pty Ltd
  4. Dodo Services Pty Ltd
  5. Adam Internet Pty Ltd
  6. Wideband Networks Pty Ltd
  • In October 2014, DBC LLC and Voltage Pictures recorded the primer application in the Australian Federal Court to get contact subtleties of 4726 clients of these six ISPs who downloaded the film illicitly.
  • The ISPs have a decision to take a fair-minded position and educate the court that, ‘The debate is between the Voltage Pictures organization and the clients who downloaded the motion picture unlawfully.’ Instead of this, iiNET and other ISPs chose to restrict the court application documented by the copyrights holders.
  • The organization is worried that their clients are unlawfully set apart to determine the application without including court methodology, which is known as ‘theoretical invoicing’, Steve Dalby (Chief Officer of iiNET) said (Dallas Buyers Club, 2017).
  • The ISPs restricted the starter application charged by copyrights holders from numerous angles. Initially, the candidates neglected to give enough proof of how they discovered damaging IP tended to. In view of this, ISPs said that the application against them is conditional. Besides, ISPs likewise denied that the candidates have given proof of having copyrights of the Dallas Buyers Club motion picture. Notwithstanding that, ISPs did the application to the Court that the Court should not constrain ISPs to uncover their clients’ private and individual data. There are numerous explanations for this application. The fundamental reason was that the candidates’ monetary cases against clients were so small and basic.
  • In any case, the Court was against this utilization of ISPs and requests them to uncover contact subtleties of 4726 clients. With this request, the court-connected two conditions. To begin with, the candidates should not enable threatening to the clients by sending provisional solicitations. Second, the Court took the duty of whatever else happens and secures clients’ protection.
  • Media Distributor: These are the ones who are solely involved in the traditional practice of providing the movies to the theaters in order to regulate a smooth business in the movie industry. They also tended to impact these case
  • Website Owner: These are the ones who are providing the service of the unlimited download of the newly released movies with the help of the magnetic link. Like the bit torrent, this is an example of the website owner.


Decrease of the sales figures of legal copies

There are a lot of places in the world where there is an availability of DVDs and CDs of the pirated IINET Dallas Club customers. There are two solutions to this either an individual can download the IINET Dallas Club customers from an online site or that individual can go to the street vendor and buy those pirated IINET Dallas Club customers. This sort of consumption of entertainment content is not only harmful to the IINET Dallas Club customers industry but also broadly ruins the culture. There are a lot of people out there who say that because of piracy people are getting access to a lot of entertainment content as the price of theatre tickets is too high. According to the idea of the democratization of entertainment, it can be said the individual who is getting access to the entertainment content online will anyway won’t buy the tickets or an original DVD from a reliable distributor as the price is too high. ( 2016)

Effect on the retail price

Piracy is not considered as a sale loss which is true (Yousef et al. 2015). Suppose the individual doesn’t get access to entertainment content online than from the next time that individual will be either buying the theatre ticket no matter what the rice is or an original DVD. ( 2019)

But, piracy also helps to reach entertainment content to a lot of individuals who don’t have the spendable income to watch an IINET Dallas Club customers in the theatres. In the aspect of the economic impact, it is hard to tell or calculate. However, this actually reflects on the decision-making of the stakeholders of a Hollywood studio. With the known fact of piracy is affecting the sales revenue of the top Hollywood studios in the world. This has a great impact on the stakeholders of the studios. Now, the stakeholders decide on which IINET Dallas Club customers the studio should be investing more and produce.

Effects on the revenue of government

The stakeholders have already faced a huge amount of loss in the box office due to piracy of the IINET Dallas Club customers. This will help the stakeholders to incline towards the IINET Dallas Club customers they are going to illegally download the movies. The impact of piracy leads the stakeholder to incest on the IINET Dallas Club customers which will draw the audiences back to the theatres and guarantee a good return in the box office. The IINET Dallas Club customers industry is more interested in the storyline, direction, and message that are being delivered to the audiences through the IINET Dallas Club customers to meet the expectations of the audiences. ( 2019)

Piracy Expectations

The copies which IINET Dallas Club customers have downloaded from the websites have been affecting the stakeholders of the Dallas Buyers Club. Since the manufacturers have decided to believe that the movie won’t be able to recover the money that has been accounted towards the distribution of the Dallas Buyers Club and the production cost of the movie. This undoubtedly puts an effect on the price of the tickets. ( 2015).

Estimated piracy of Dallas buyers Club

It is impossible to state the number of downloads that the IINET Dallas Club customers have been downloading since the release of the Dallas buyer Club. That is there has been a spread of CDs, DVDs as well as pen drives which have been spread along with the social environment. This is putting an effect on the stakeholders of the Dallas Buyers Club as they have solely invested in this movie. ( 2016)

Losses that are non profitable

Piracy doesn’t really affect the stakeholders directly. In this context, it could be said the people will stop going to the theaters when the movie will be downloadable at a piracy site. This doesn’t actually affect the stakeholders directly. But indirectly, it lowers the reputation of the movie as well as decreases the foot count as well as increases the counterfeit of the copies of the movie. ( 2015).


From research, obviously, DBC LLC was proposed to gather many dollars from Australian privateers utilizing a system called ‘tentative invoicing’ on the grounds that DBC LLC utilized a similar technique against the US and other nations. On another side, numerous individuals trusted that the Australian Federal Court permitted DBC LLC to make a move against Australian privateers to stop theft in Australia. . The policy problems that are faced by the stakeholders of the Dallas club are being stated as well. With the development of technology, there are certain downfalls in the other industry; this report is consisting of all these discussions. The definition of the stakeholder is being stated and how a stakeholder tends to affect a business or get affected by a business or can be both in some scenarios. The report is stating the types of stakeholders including the internal as well as the external stakeholder. The interest of both stakeholders is mentioned in this report. The roles, as well as the responsibilities of the stakeholders, are mentioned as well. The influence of piracy is stating the negative as well as the positive effect on the audiences who are consuming IINET Dallas Club. ( 2013)

Reference List

  • Bellucci, M., & Manetti, G. (2018). Stakeholder engagement and sustainability reporting. UK: Routledge. Retrieved From: Retrieved On: 15th March 2019
  • Esmail, L., Moore, E., & Rein, A. (2015). Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice. Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 4(2), 133-145. Retrieved From: Retrieved On: 22nd March 2019
  • Ferretti, V. (2016). From stakeholders analysis to cognitive mapping and Multi-Attribute Value Theory: An integrated approach for policy support. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(2), 524-541. Retrieved From : Retrieved On: 17th March 2019
  • Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., Yang, R. J., & Li, C. Z. (2017). Investigating key challenges in major public engineering projects by a network-theory based analysis of stakeholder concerns: A case study. International Journal of Project Management, 35(1), 78-94. Retrieved From: Retrieved On: 18Th March 2019
  • Parent, M. M., Kristiansen, E., Skille, E. Å., & Hanstad, D. V. (2015). The sustainability of the Youth Olympic Games: Stakeholder networks and institutional perspectives. International Review for the Sociology of sport, 50(3), 326-348. Retrieved From: Retrieved on 21st March 2019
  • Purvis, R. L., Zagenczyk, T. J., & McCray, G. E. (2015). What’s in it for me? Using expectancy theory and climate to explain stakeholder participation, its direction and intensity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 3-14. Retrieved From: Retrieved On: 19th March 2019
  • Warner, J. (2016). The beauty of the beast: Multi-stakeholder participation for integrated catchment management. In Multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated water management (pp. 17-36). Routledge. Retrieved From: Retrieved on: 16th March 2019
  • Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Wosnitza, M., & Schroeder, U. (2015). A cluster analysis of MOOC stakeholder perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 12(1), 74-90. Retrieved From: Retrieved On: 20th March 2019
  • (2019), pm, Retrieved From: Retrieved On: 23rd March 2019
  • (2019), national college, Retrieved From: Retrieved On: 24th March 2019
  • (2015), smh, retrieved from: Dallas Club customers-pirates-20151216-glowvd.html retrieved on: 27th March 2019
  • (2016), news, retrieved from: Dallas Club customers-downloaders-finally-comes-to-an-end/news-story/a51ba7091b090be07a559a3cab8ad7f1 retrieved on: 28th March 2019)
  • (2019), , Retrieved From: Retrieved On: 25th March 2019
  • (2013), mmu , Retrieved From: Retrieved On: 26th March 2019    

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student.

Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

experts 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help you just now

delivery Starting from 3 hours delivery

Find Free Essays

We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Dallas Buyers Club And Copyright Problems. (2021, October 25). GradesFixer. Retrieved November 29, 2021, from
“Dallas Buyers Club And Copyright Problems.” GradesFixer, 25 Oct. 2021,
Dallas Buyers Club And Copyright Problems. [online]. Available at: <> [Accessed 29 Nov. 2021].
Dallas Buyers Club And Copyright Problems [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2021 Oct 25 [cited 2021 Nov 29]. Available from:
copy to clipboard

Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you’d like this or any other sample, we’ll happily email it to you.

    By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails.


    Attention! This essay is not unique. You can get a 100% Plagiarism-FREE one in 30 sec

    Receive a 100% plagiarism-free essay on your email just for $4.99
    get unique paper
    *Public papers are open and may contain not unique content
    download public sample

    Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.



    Please check your inbox.

    Want us to write one just for you? We can custom edit this essay into an original, 100% plagiarism free essay.

    thanks-icon Order now

    Hi there!

    Are you interested in getting a customized paper?

    Check it out!
    Having trouble finding the perfect essay? We’ve got you covered. Hire a writer

    Haven't found the right essay?

    Get an expert to write you the one you need!


    Professional writers and researchers


    Sources and citation are provided


    3 hour delivery