close
test_template

Evaluation of Three Scholarly Definitions of Reliigon

Human-Written
download print

About this sample

About this sample

close
Human-Written

Words: 996 |

Pages: 2|

5 min read

Updated: 16 November, 2024

Words: 996|Pages: 2|5 min read

Updated: 16 November, 2024

Table of contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Historical Context and Definitions
  3. Durkheim’s Perspective
  4. Marx’s Critique
  5. Freud’s Psychological Analysis
  6. Conclusion
  7. References

Introduction

This essay will discuss and evaluate three scholarly definitions of religion. It will use a range of both primary and secondary sources to determine which is the best definition of religion. The essay will examine and assess the beliefs and theories of Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx, and Sigmund Freud.

Historical Context and Definitions

The word ‘religion’ derives from the Latin words ‘religio’, ‘religere’ and ‘religare’. ‘Religare’ means to bind and ‘religere’ means to repeat, which links into the works and theory of scholar number one, Emile Durkheim. Durkheim believed that religion was more down to a community of people rather than it being individual. In John Bawker’s Oxford Dictionary of World Religions, he is quoted saying, “A religion is a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, that is to say, things set apart and forbidden – beliefs and practices which unite into one single moral community called a Church, all those who adhere to them” (Bawker, 1997). This quote suggests that not one person could be religious, and it must be a group of people with the same beliefs and practices to be religious, as he refers to it, a church.

Durkheim’s Perspective

It is important also to note that, like Marx, Durkheim was raised as an atheist and not in a religious community. This could contribute to a different point of view compared to a religious scholar. Durkheim’s definition of religion is valuable as it explains a large number of religious individuals around the world and why there are so many different and diverse religions. However, there are many criticisms of Durkheim’s definition. A key criticism is that Durkheim’s view focuses on religion and the community aspect, but his definition does not address those individuals who work against society and claim they are not religious. Durkheim's approach doesn't fully capture the diversity of religious experiences, including solitary practices and personal spirituality.

Marx’s Critique

I feel that Durkheim’s definition is good but not as comprehensive as Marx’s, who accounts for all religious believers, not only those who work with society, as Durkheim does. Marx’s definition of religion is similar to Durkheim’s in the sense that it is a function of society. However, Marx’s view is very different as it is negative, saying it is “the opiate of the masses” (Marx, 1843). However, scholars such as Raines disagree that it is negative. In his book Marx on Religion, he discusses the possibility that religion, to Marx, was a moral agency for the deprived of society’s class-based system (Raines, 2002). It should also be mentioned that Marx saw two classes of society: the working classes (Proletarians) and the modern capitalists who exploit the working classes (Bourgeois). It was also society’s protest against suffering.

Freud’s Psychological Analysis

Sigmund Freud is the final scholar researched in this essay. Freud, famous for his controversial works in the field of psychology, also attempted, like many psychologists before him, to define religion. Ernest Jones (1957) once wrote that Freud’s work had “evoked more controversy and condemnation than any of his other works” (Jones, 1957). Freud believed religion to be a neurosis and once compared it to one. There are several theories that Freud links with God or religion. One of these is known as the Oedipus Complex, a theory that incorporates a repressed rivalry for their father who also craves their mother’s attention. This links to religion as Freud argues that God can also be a Father figure among believers.

Another theory that incorporates religion is the ‘Primal Horde Theory,’ suggesting that when humans were still very primal and lived in hordes, they would often worship an animal (sometimes killed in ritual) or a totem. According to Freud, this was the start of religion, as eventually, this ‘want’ for a father figure became too much, and the totems became the Gods of modern-day religions. Although Freud was brought up within a Jewish community, he rejected all things religious, and therefore his definition of religion was that it was a mental illness. Freud's approach reduces religion to psychological phenomena, neglecting its cultural and historical contexts.

Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.

Conclusion

To conclude, all the scholars in this essay have similar points of view as they all concern society and look at different sociological factors. For example, Marx looks at economics, Durkheim looks at religion within the community, and Freud looks at religion and the individual from a psychological perspective. It is my firm belief that out of all these scholars, Durkheim has the best definition of religion because it’s a definition that works for some cases and looks at the community aspect, which, arguably to some religious believers, is the most important part. I believe that Marx also has a good point of view when it comes to economics because it makes sense that the rich of the time would use a system of religion to continue the exploitation of underpaid workers to make themselves more powerful. Freud does have some compelling arguments when it comes to psychology; however, going back to Ernest Jones’ comment, his beliefs are so reductionist that they offend some believers as he doesn’t look at the bigger picture.

References

  • Bawker, J. (1997). Oxford Dictionary of World Religions. Oxford University Press.
  • Jones, E. (1957). The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud. Basic Books.
  • Marx, K. (1843). A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher.
  • Raines, J. C. (2002). Marx on Religion. Temple University Press.
Image of Dr. Oliver Johnson
This essay was reviewed by
Dr. Oliver Johnson

Cite this Essay

Evaluation of Three Scholarly Definitions of Reliigon. (2018, September 27). GradesFixer. Retrieved November 19, 2024, from https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/different-scholars-definitions-of-religion/
“Evaluation of Three Scholarly Definitions of Reliigon.” GradesFixer, 27 Sept. 2018, gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/different-scholars-definitions-of-religion/
Evaluation of Three Scholarly Definitions of Reliigon. [online]. Available at: <https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/different-scholars-definitions-of-religion/> [Accessed 19 Nov. 2024].
Evaluation of Three Scholarly Definitions of Reliigon [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2018 Sept 27 [cited 2024 Nov 19]. Available from: https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/different-scholars-definitions-of-religion/
copy
Keep in mind: This sample was shared by another student.
  • 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
  • Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours
Write my essay

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

close

Where do you want us to send this sample?

    By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

    close

    Be careful. This essay is not unique

    This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

    Download this Sample

    Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

    close

    Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

    close

    Thanks!

    Please check your inbox.

    We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

    clock-banner-side

    Get Your
    Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

    exit-popup-close
    We can help you get a better grade and deliver your task on time!
    • Instructions Followed To The Letter
    • Deadlines Met At Every Stage
    • Unique And Plagiarism Free
    Order your paper now