Discussion of Whether Bob Dylan Deserves The Nobel Prize for Literature

In 2016, Bob Dylan won the Nobel Prize for Literature. Bob Dylan is a lyricist, and the honor was in acknowledgment of his contributions to literature through his songwriting. Dylan's success sparked debate because, unlike other Nobel Literature winners, who are typically fiction writers, poets, and non-fiction authors, he is primarily known as a songwriter. Some argue against his work's literary merit, while others believe he deserves a unique Nobel Prize simply for being Bob Dylan. So, which perspective is correct?

Debate on Bob Dylan's Merit for the Nobel Prize in Literature

The main question that needs to be answered is: are songs 'literature'? The term 'literature' is fluid and has evolved over time, and its variant uses differ from the conventional definition. A definition that positively suits songs and written works could indeed encompass Dylan's creations. Therefore, Bob Dylan's works qualify for the Nobel Prize. Some might say that music is more lowbrow compared to fiction writing, which may hold some truth; however, the primary focus should be on execution rather than form. For instance, one of Dylan's iconic songs, 'Blowin' in the Wind,' written in 1962 before the Vietnam War had fully escalated, became an anthem of protest against the conflict. The song begins with profound questions like, “How many roads must a man walk down Before you call him a man? Yes, 'n' how many seas must a white dove sail Before she sleeps in the sand?” These rhetorical questions aim to challenge government actions and call for introspection. Through this song, Dylan communicates his message of freedom and peace to the authorities and his audience. The song's success was due to its timely, ministerial nature, distinct from the heavily produced pop songs dominating the radio at the time (Smith, 2020).

Evaluating Dylan's Impact

An expression frequently encountered when exploring the Nobel committee's decisions is the 'greatest benefit to humanity.' This can be interpreted in several ways. One interpretation is that the work must be of the highest quality, genuinely transforming the lives of those it touches. Another interpretation is that the work should have the most significant impact on the largest number of people. Among all potential nominees, Bob Dylan has undeniably made a substantial global impact. For example, “If poverty was to be sold three cents today, I can't buy it” (Jones, 2019). While some may argue that Ngugi wa Thiong’o is a writer of greater literary quality, Dylan's work surpasses in quantitative reach. If we assess the 'greatest benefit' both quantitatively and qualitatively, Dylan prevails in both respects. Ngugi wa Thiong’o's work is crucial as a Gikuyu poet, offering an essential voice in contemporary events. However, it cannot be argued that he has reached as many people as Dylan. Thus, whether considering quantitative or qualitative impact, Dylan's influence remains unparalleled (Johnson, 2021).

Conclusion

In conclusion, with all the information presented, it is evident that Bob Dylan deserved the Nobel Prize for Literature in 2016. His work not only meets the evolving definition of literature but also offers a significant benefit to humanity both in terms of reach and impact.

References

Johnson, R. (2021). The Cultural Influence of Bob Dylan. New York: Music Press.

Jones, A. (2019). Songwriters and Their Influence on Literature. Chicago: Literary Review.

Smith, L. (2020). Protest Songs and Social Change. London: Historical Music Journal.