By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
About this sample
About this sample
Words: 886 |
Pages: 2|
5 min read
Updated: 15 November, 2024
Words: 886|Pages: 2|5 min read
Updated: 15 November, 2024
In this situation, the key players are the employees. They affect customers, shareholders, suppliers, and even the community. If Roger Jacobs sticks around at Shellington Pharmaceuticals with his shady behavior, the employees won't be happy campers. I mean, who would be? Their morale will hit rock bottom, hurting their work and how they treat customers. And if customers get bad vibes from staff, they might just ditch the company altogether.
Imagine that happening—losing profits like that would mess up things for shareholders too. With fewer customers and shrinking profits, Shellington wouldn't just get a bad name in town; they might not pay suppliers on time either. How's that for a domino effect?
Now picture this: if we kick Jacobs out of the company, everyone involved benefits big time. Employees won't have to deal with his nonsense anymore. Without him lurking around with his snarky comments and creepy behavior, they'd actually do their jobs better. Imagine them focusing more and liking their work again! Customer relations would naturally improve, right? Happy employees make happy customers who keep coming back.
That means more profit for Shellington, no money issues with shareholders, and suppliers getting paid on time. Everyone wins! But there's still stuff that needs fixing at Shellington Pharmaceuticals.
The main problem? The company's lousy at handling employee conflicts. The work environment isn't safe—physically or mentally—with all these harassment claims against Jacobs flying around. It's crazy how this keeps happening because complaints seem to vanish into thin air without any real action taken against Jacobs.
Could it be because the company's boss is more focused on money than anything else? Maybe that's why Harry Rull lets Jacobs slide despite his terrible actions since he's supposedly good at his job.
On another note, some employees might be trying to play the system too. If someone can only be fired for poor performance but gets rave reviews like Jacobs does... well, it's kinda fishy. Then there are those harassment charges that got dropped—what's up with that? Maybe there's no solid proof because people weren't being totally honest about it all.
A bit of honesty goes a long way when you're working somewhere you want to respect (and be respected by).
If Shellington wants to clean up its act ethically speaking—they gotta start by reminding top management what really matters here besides money-making schemes.
No more letting folks like Jacobs off scot-free after breaking rules left-and-right! It's high time ethics officers step in to update codes so everybody knows what's what.
And hey—a meeting wouldn’t hurt either! Let’s remind everyone about following these guidelines while maybe setting up training sessions for anyone needing extra help understanding them better.
Before deciding whether or not I should fire Roger Jacobs or just give him a slap on wrist instead (metaphorically speaking), let me weigh my options carefully first:
But remember: over ten years now—and numerous warnings later—Jacobs still hasn't learned his lesson nor treated colleagues properly… So maybe cutting ties would serve everyone better ultimately?
I mean think about it—from behavioral management perspective prioritizing employee safety/well-being sounds pretty darn important moving forward as organization does it not?
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled