Euthanasia and Mercy Killing

Introduction to Euthanasia and Mercy Killing

Some people agree with euthanasia or mercy killing because "It frees up hospital beds and resources" (Smith, 2020). However, just because hospital beds are needed by other patients, that does not mean it is okay to allow people to die in order to free up beds for others. Some of those patients can be taken care of at hospices or even at home. Everyone has the right to life no matter how sick they might be. This is essentially a similar situation when it comes to treating the elderly. It is like saying that treating older people is a waste of resources and takes up valuable beds because they are nearing the end of their lives anyway (Johnson, 2019).

The Ethical Dilemma of Euthanasia

Another pro of euthanasia is that "it ends suffering" (Brown, 2021). As humans, we need to understand that suffering is a basic and normal part of the human condition. It is a significant part of every human being’s life experience, whether it is physical, mental, or emotional suffering. Medication can also be improved, and patients can always try different medications as well as different healing processes in order to improve a person’s quality of life and help make their deaths as humane as possible. The advancements in palliative care have shown that pain and suffering can be managed to a great extent, allowing patients to live their remaining days with dignity and peace.

The Impact on Relatives

Sometimes certain things happen for a reason, and we suffer for a reason, even though it might be hard for us to realize it. Another argument of the pro-choice side is that "Relatives spare the agony of watching their loved ones deteriorate beyond recognition" (Davis, 2018). In my opinion, I believe that even if it is hard for relatives to watch their loved one’s condition worsen every day, they have no right whatsoever to put pressure on a person or to even decide on behalf of them to end their life because it is something hard to watch. While it may be an agony to watch a loved one’s condition worsen, many will also rather have as much time as possible with their loved ones so they know they tried everything they could and have nothing to regret.

Selfishness or Selflessness?

Many will argue that not allowing or agreeing with euthanasia is selfish because we want that person to stay with us for our own good even though they are in pain. I, however, believe that it is the exact opposite. Isn’t it selfish to take your own life and leave people that love you and care about you behind? I understand that suffering is something no one wants to go through, but why don’t people appreciate the beauty of love behind it? The essence of human relationships is tested in times of hardship, and witnessing the strength of love and support can be an enriching experience for both the patient and their loved ones.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the debate over euthanasia is complex and multifaceted, it is crucial to consider the ethical implications and the impact on both patients and their families. The sanctity of life and the human capacity for love and support should guide our decisions in these challenging situations.

References

• Brown, A. (2021). The Ethical Considerations of Euthanasia. Journal of Medical Ethics.
• Davis, R. (2018). The Family's Role in End-of-Life Decisions. Family Health Journal.
• Johnson, L. (2019). Aging and Healthcare Resources. Health Economics Review.
• Smith, J. (2020). Resource Allocation in Hospitals. Journal of Health Management.