Indexing Multidimensional Data for Nearest Neighbor Queries

Most previous works in the database literature has focused on indexing lower dimensional data and on other types of queries besides similarity queries. The lc-d tree was one of the first structures proposed for indexing multidimensional data for nearest neighbor queries. Recently, this structure has been used in geographic information systems for queries like similarity queries, and might be useful for similarity indexing. Other methods such as space filling curves, linear quad trees, and grid files, do not scale well to high dimensions, but may be useful for medium dimensional data.

Historical Context of Multidimensional Indexing

The R-tree and its most successful variant, the R*-tree, have been used most often for indexing high dimensional data in the database literature. However, since ranges are stored on each dimension, the index requires more space and time to search in higher dimensionality. For this reason, higher dimensional data typically is mapped to a lower dimensional space before indexing in R-trees.

Introduction to TV-tree

The TV-tree is the only method in the database literature thus far that has been proposed specifically for indexing high-dimensional data. Performance comparisons clearly show that the TV-tree can be much more efficient than the R*-tree. However, the improved performance depends on two assumptions. The first assumption is that dimensions and the feature vectors are ordered by “importance.” This second assumption is that sets of feature vectors in the dataset will tend to exactly match on dimensions, especially on the first few “important” dimensions.

Assumptions Affecting Performance

The first assumption is reasonable (if not desirable) since an appropriate transform may be used. The second assumption was not explicitly stated, Ln the paper, but a careful analysis of their algorithms reveals that their performance improvement depends upon it. In some applications, the original feature vectors contain a small set of discrete quantities, so the second assumption does hold.

Limitations in Visual Information Systems

Unfortunately, this second assumption will normally not be true in visual information systems, and in many other applications. Features in these applications are typically real-valued, so that chances of exactly matching on dimensions are negligible. In this case, the TV-tree reduces to an index on only first few dimensions. Small changes in the proposed algorithms should allow the TV-tree to be a modest improvement over the R*-tree in these applications. However, in this paper, we will refer to the R-tree (and variants) as the best previously known structure for similarity indexing because it has proven itself in more similarity indexing applications.

Related Works Beyond Database Literature

There is also related work outside of the database literature. In the information retrieval literature, work has been done on cluster fides that proposes structures similar to the SS-tree. In the image database community, a static indexing structure based on Kohonen nets was suggested. There is also related work in the computational geometry and vector quantization literature.