Judges has various roles and duties in the constitutional democracy of Canada. They interpret the law, assess the evidence presented, and control how hearings and trials unfold in their courtrooms. Most important of all, judges are impartial decision-makers in the pursuit of justice. (Canadian Superior...
India, a country where rule of law exists and the third pillar of the government i.e. judiciary is seen as the most trusted one among all other pillars of the democracy but the questions over the highest authority of the highest institution i.e. Chief Justice...
Arbitration is considered a process of resolution of disputes between the parties taking into consideration the arbitral tribunal that is being appointed by the parties committing disputes after a party request to it. It is also considered as an alternative method for litigation of resolving...
On 27th September 2018 I attended the provincial court of British Columbia inCourtenay. In the court, food, drinks and cell phones on are not allowed. I reached in the court at before 2:00pm. Before entering the court, I met with a lawyer at there. I...
Materials of the case Harriton v Stephens gave the High Court an opportunity to make a morally and socially important decision that was legally justified, as it managed to do for wrongful birth. However, the court’s reluctance to acknowledge the legal rights of an individual...
It can adequately be argued that the jury system has its roots in England and it is basically made up of twelve people who sit in criminal and civil events to make decisions on matters of facts and not law since the jurists in most...
This paper will employ close visual analysis of the Gates of Hell and the Last Judgment describing how the form of the work relates to its function within the representation of hell. Made-to-order essay as fast as you need it Each essay is customized to...
Introduction The Supreme Court of Canada, seen as the guardian of the constitution was given the advantage of making broad judicial decisions after the entrenchment of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982 (Kelly, 2004). The courts prior to the Charter had authority, but...
