Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.
Any subject. Any type of essay.
We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.
121 writers online
Ethics are moral principles that administrate a person’s behavior or the conducting of an activity. Justification is the act of presenting something to be right or reasonable. Some may say that ethics are the only reasonable justification for anything. Alternatively, one can argue anything may be justified ethically. It all depends on what morals you subscribe to. For example, you could argue that it’s wrong to let people suffer for the rest of their lives so euthanasia is ethically sound in that circumstance. You could also argue that killing is always wrong so euthanasia is ethically illogical. Ethics and morals are subjective and impossible to define absolutely.
Politicians through the ages have loved them because they can be used to justify anything. The problem of how, if at all, we could set about justifying assertions about what we ought to do in various practical situations is one that has been the major concern of moral philosophers. Such basic questions are indeed endemic in most branches of philosophy. We ask not only if we can ever know what we ought to do but whether we can justify our claims to knowledge of an external world, how we can know the truth of statements about the past, or whether we can ever be sure of the existence of minds other than our own. But in ethics, the problem seems more recalcitrant and, indeed, to many non-philosophers at least, more real. For while skepticism about the existence of an external world or of other minds may seem difficult to refute, to most it is impossible to embrace, whereas skepticism about the possibility of claiming knowledge of any objective truths about what we ought to do is not so rare, either among men in general or those who would wish to characterize themselves as philosophers. It is not, of course, surprising that this should be so.
Ethical attitudes very much more, from society to society and even between individuals, than do our beliefs about the external world or other people’s feelings. The patent fact of ethical disagreement forces us to reexamine the bases of our moral beliefs. Furthermore, the disagreements we encounter concerning moral issues often seem to involve deep matters of principle that leave no common ground between the disputants. This is sometimes referred to as the problem of disagreement about ultimate moral principles. It is this problem—whether ultimate moral principles are susceptible to rational justification—that will be examined in this article.
Whenever we provide an argument we should provide some justification for any controversial premise that our argument requires everyone to accept. We need to answer the question, ‘Why should anyone agree?’. The objective of this study, therefore, is to review the concept of “Justification of Ethics”. This study is simply conducted for the partial fulfillment of the requirement for the project of BBA 5th semester. And only the secondary data is used and analyzed which could not disclose the actual result. And being the first endeavor, the report can comprise some mistakes which may cause to misinterpretation of the result.
Main limitation and difficulties in the process of preparation of this report are as follows:
Our research is based on the secondary source. We reviewed data present by another writer for our study. We even visited the different website to make our research analytical. We also collected data from a different website which are mention in the appendix.
Justification of Ethics is defined as the way of defining a particular act whether it is morally right or wrong. Whenever we provide an argument we should provide some justification for any controversial premise that our argument requires everyone to accept. We need to answer the question, ‘Why should anyone agree?’. I will discuss four kind of justifications and the corresponding fallacies:
We don’t always have the time to find out every fact about the universe through scientific experimentation. Instead, we accept the knowledge of others. This is especially important when we want to know about science or technology.
Example: we know that eating too much fatty food tends to be unhealthy. We can rely on expert opinion as long as the experts agree and arrived at their opinions through a reliable method. If experts arrived at their opinions through a reliable method and they agree, then we have a great deal of reason to agree with them. If an expert knows much more than we do about something, then we might have no choice but to take their opinion seriously.
The relevant opinions of experts aren’t beliefs we necessarily have to agree with, but they are worthy of consideration (and permissible to hold), even when the experts disagree. For example, scientists aren’t sure if string theory is true. Therefore, we have good reason to be uncertain about what to think on the subject. It seems plausible to think that it can be rational to believe that string theory is true or to reject it as false.
It is inappropriate to cite an authority when (a) the person is not an expert (of the topic in question), (b) the experts disagree, or (c) the experts are unable to form a reliable opinion.
For example, doctors are generally not experts in philosophy, so their philosophical opinions are not particularly relevant to any philosophical debate. When people cite an authority in order to support their argument in the wrong way, they are using a fallacy known as the appeal to inappropriate authority.
Analogies are often used to help us justify our arguments. Analogies are comparisons between two things that reveal some relevant similarity between those two things. For example, punching people and kicking people are both generally wrong for the same reason they hurt people. So, punching and kicking are analogous in that sense.
Example: Peter Singer’s comparison of saving a drowning child in a small pool of water and saving lives through charity. He argues that both forms of behavior are moral obligations because we can do a great deal of good at little cost to ourselves. False Analogy Analogies don’t always work. To use an analogy to support an argument when the analogy doesn’t reflect the relevant similarities is a fallacy known as a false analogy. Some people think Peter Singer’s analogy is fallacious, but that is a contentious issue. Examples: i. The death penalty and murder are both analogous insofar as they kill people. ii. It is wrong to murder someone. iii. Therefore, it is probably wrong to have the death penalty.
The problem with this argument is that we know it is sometimes wrong to kill someone, but it might also be morally acceptable to kill others in certain extenuating circumstances. The death penalty might be one of the few times that killing a person can be morally acceptable. Generalization Generalization is essential for just about any justification to work. Example: we assume that the past will be like the future in certain ways. The Sun will rise tomorrow. Eating lots of fatty foods will still be unhealthy two days from now. In particular, it seems rational to assume that the world will continue to be predictable in the future insofar as the laws of nature will remain the same. The law of gravity will continue to exist, the causal processes we interact with will continue to exist, etc. Hasty Generalization However, there is various ways generalization could be inappropriately applied. One common failure of generalization is the hasty generalization fallacy. We need a sufficiently large sample size before we can generalize. A common result of reasoning with a hasty generalization is racism.
People who have had some bad experiences with people of a certain racial group sometimes decide that everyone of that racial group has various negative traits. However, each of us has a very unique and limited experience of the world and we shouldn’t judge a group of people based on a handful of experiences.
One of the most common types of justification is a personal experience. We know other people have thoughts in part because we personally have thoughts. We think they see the color green in part because we see the color green. Personal experience is an important factor in justification despite the fact that it requires a unique and limited experience of the world.
Personal experience can be combined with generalization and observation to know that others have the similar personal experience to our own. Example: we experience that pain feels bad and that touching fire causes us pain. It is not such a leap to realize that other people don’t want us to burn them with fire because pain also feels bad for them.
Personal experience is often misused in justifications, which is known as the anecdotal evidence fallacy. What people call testimonial evidence tends to be used as a form of anecdotal evidence to argue that something is true for me and so it must be true for others as well (without the appropriate generalization or observations involved).
For example, the fact that a drug works for us doesn’t mean it will work for others. We see the anecdotal evidence fallacy on television every day. People always say, “If I can do it, so can you!” Or “It worked for me, so it will work for you!” There is no way to know this without a scientific study and relevant data. Examples:
We need to try to justify our arguments appropriately. To justify an argument appropriately seems rare in everyday life, so we should give our justifications a lot more thought and consideration. It might not be possible to always justify our arguments perfectly, but we can get better with experience.
We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:
Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you’d like this or any other sample, we’ll happily email it to you.
Attention! this essay is not unique. You can get 100% plagiarism FREE essay in 30sec
Sorry, we cannot unicalize this essay. You can order Unique paper and our professionals Rewrite it for you
Your essay sample has been sent.
Want us to write one just for you? We can custom edit this essay into an original, 100% plagiarism free essay.Order now
Are you interested in getting a customized paper?Check it out!