Navigators Insurance Company Limited and Ors v Atlasnavios-Navegacao LDA: [Essay Example], 300 words GradesFixer

Haven't found the right essay?

Get an expert to write your essay!


Professional writers and researchers


Sources and citation are provided


3 hour delivery

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.

Navigators Insurance Company Limited and Ors v Atlasnavios-Navegacao LDA

Print Download now

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay.

We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

Get your price

121 writers online

Download PDF

In March 2018, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes, Lord Briggs) will hear this appeal relating to the interpretation and interplay between clauses of the standard form Institute War and Strikes Clauses 1/10/83. The Supreme Court will consider whether the exclusion clause 4.1.5, for losses arising from detainment by reasons of infringement of customs regulations, operates to exclude cover where the infringement of customs regulations occurred due to an insured peril.

The Facts

The Appellants were the owners of a vessel named the “B Atlantic”. It took out war risk insurance with the Respondents on the Institute War and Strikes Clauses 1/10/83 with additional perils. On 13 August 2007, in a Venezuelan port undersea divers inspected the vessel and discovered 132kg of cocaine strapped to its hull by an unknown person. This contravened Venezuelan law and as a result, the local authorities detained the vessel and convicted the Master and Second Officer. The owners eventually abandoned the vessel and claimed for constructive loss under the war risk policy.

The Policy provided cover against loss of, or damage to, the Vessel caused by any person acting maliciously. It also excluded the loss, damage, liability or expense arising from detainment or confiscation by reason of infringement of any customs or trading regulations (the “Exclusion”).

The insurers accepted that the owners and crew were not complicit in the smuggling and litigation proceeded on that basis. The insurer also accepted that the vessel constituted a constructive loss bur denied cover on the basis that detention arose by reason of the infringement of customs regulation.

The owners argued that on a proper construction of the policy, clause 4.1.4 did not exclude losses, which arose from an insured risk, namely the malicious acts of a third party under clause 1.5.

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student.

Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

100% plagiarism free

Sources and citations are provided

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

GradesFixer. (2019, February, 27) Navigators Insurance Company Limited and Ors v Atlasnavios-Navegacao LDA. Retrived February 26, 2020, from
"Navigators Insurance Company Limited and Ors v Atlasnavios-Navegacao LDA." GradesFixer, 27 Feb. 2019, Accessed 26 February 2020.
GradesFixer. 2019. Navigators Insurance Company Limited and Ors v Atlasnavios-Navegacao LDA., viewed 26 February 2020, <>
GradesFixer. Navigators Insurance Company Limited and Ors v Atlasnavios-Navegacao LDA. [Internet]. February 2019. [Accessed February 26, 2020]. Available from:

Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you’d like this or any other sample, we’ll happily email it to you.

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails.



Your essay sample has been sent.

Want us to write one just for you? We can custom edit this essay into an original, 100% plagiarism free essay.

thanks-icon Order now

Hi there!

Are you interested in getting a customized paper?

Check it out!
Having trouble finding the perfect essay? We’ve got you covered. Hire a writer uses cookies. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.