This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.

Review of The Case of The Company Insurance Risks

downloadDownload printPrint

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

Get custom essay

121 writers online


In March 2018, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes, Lord Briggs) will hear this appeal relating to the interpretation and interplay between clauses of the standard form Institute War and Strikes Clauses 1/10/83. The Supreme Court will consider whether the exclusion clause 4.1.5, for losses arising from detainment by reasons of infringement of customs regulations, operates to exclude cover where the infringement of customs regulations occurred due to an insured peril.

The Appellants were the owners of a vessel named the “B Atlantic”. It took out war risk insurance with the Respondents on the Institute War and Strikes Clauses 1/10/83 with additional perils. On 13 August 2007, in a Venezuelan port undersea divers inspected the vessel and discovered 132kg of cocaine strapped to its hull by an unknown person. This contravened Venezuelan law and as a result, the local authorities detained the vessel and convicted the Master and Second Officer. The owners eventually abandoned the vessel and claimed for constructive loss under the war risk policy.

The Policy provided cover against loss of, or damage to, the Vessel caused by any person acting maliciously. It also excluded the loss, damage, liability or expense arising from detainment or confiscation by reason of infringement of any customs or trading regulations (the “Exclusion”).

The insurers accepted that the owners and crew were not complicit in the smuggling and litigation proceeded on that basis. The insurer also accepted that the vessel constituted a constructive loss bur denied cover on the basis that detention arose by reason of the infringement of customs regulation.

The owners argued that on a proper construction of the policy, clause 4.1.4 did not exclude losses, which arose from an insured risk, namely the malicious acts of a third party under clause 1.5.

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student.

Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

experts 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help you just now

delivery Starting from 3 hours delivery

Find Free Essays

We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Review of the Case of the Company Insurance Risks. (2019, February 27). GradesFixer. Retrieved October 1, 2022, from
“Review of the Case of the Company Insurance Risks.” GradesFixer, 27 Feb. 2019,
Review of the Case of the Company Insurance Risks. [online]. Available at: <> [Accessed 1 Oct. 2022].
Review of the Case of the Company Insurance Risks [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2019 Feb 27 [cited 2022 Oct 1]. Available from:
copy to clipboard

Where do you want us to send this sample?

    By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.


    Be careful. This essay is not unique

    This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

    Download this Sample

    Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts


    Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.



    Please check your inbox.

    We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!


    Hi there!

    Are you interested in getting a customized paper?

    Check it out!
    Don't use plagiarized sources. Get your custom essay. Get custom paper

    Haven't found the right essay?

    Get an expert to write you the one you need!


    Professional writers and researchers


    Sources and citation are provided


    3 hour delivery