Pragmatist's Understanding of The Truth in William James's Work

In Pragmatism's Conception of Truth, William James discusses the pragmatist's understanding of the truth and clarifies some misunderstandings that have been experienced by some of the audience.

The idea of ​​popular reality is a replica of reality and, although this definition serves things that can be easily perceived by the senses, it quickly gets in trouble when ideas can not correctly reproduce their objects. James adopted the 'intellectual' hypothesis that the truth contained a static and stagnant relationship. Instead, he said, 'real ideas are ideas that we can assimilate, validate, validate and validate.' In this perspective, the truth of an idea is not a static property inherited from it. It is rather an action that takes place through an idea that takes place through events. It happens with a real idea, it happens, it has been proven by the events and the truth is really an event, a process, 'he says.

Truth is not a goal in itself, but a tool for any object. For example, a person lost in the forest wants to find the real way out of the forest to save his life. It is also advantageous to have a 'general repository of additional facts' that may be useful in future situations. They are useful when such facts are relevant because they are true and true. After all, they are useful, which means the same thing for James. 'This is the name of what started the review process,' he says.

Direct and indirect precision checks are useful when 'conditions are sufficient. For example, an American who has never been to Japan can always assume that Japan exists. The truth is that young people living in çoğunlukla credit systems often continue until their questions and beliefs are in doubt. Meanwhile, the beliefs 'all approved for construction' by some organizations. Concerning mental ideas, faith is 'absolute or unconditional' and is called definition or principle. In mathematics, for example, the truth is infinite.

New ideas must take into account existing knowledge if they are to become reality. Only then the question arises: what about reality to establish the truth? According to James, personal correspondence in which the mind copies the object has already shown that this does not always work. So he claims that every idea that helps people cope with reality and does not disappoint them - the conditions for 'adaptation' and adaptation to hay for life are met. offers. When alternative ideas are consistent with accepted reality, people choose what they believe based on their subjective prejudices. In science, the truth is that 'we give the greatest satisfaction ... but it is in line with the first and the new truth.'

James is now investigating the rationalist allegations that verification existed before verification. According to them, 'when thoughts engage in dishonesty or indifference, they are directly involved in [truth]. James opposes this idea. He says that we cannot say the name of a particular reality as something alone, and we can explain the altar after the reality. 'The absolute truth of James is that no additional experience will ever change the perfect point of disappearance when we imagine that all our temporary realities merge. The Absolute Truth puts you in the same category as 'perfect wise man' and 'absolutely full experience.' That means 'if it happens, it will happen together.' For now, he says, we must meet with 'justice that we can get today and be ready to lie tomorrow.'

The need for pragmatists for justice is part of the general duty of the gel to do what it pays. ' Paying for real ideas says that James is the only reason we accomplish our mission. Therefore, you must accept that the truth is conditional. Calls on critics of the concept of pragmatic truth to present a more 'dream of reality.