By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
About this sample
About this sample
Words: 1137 |
Pages: 2|
6 min read
Published: Oct 4, 2018
Words: 1137|Pages: 2|6 min read
Published: Oct 4, 2018
If the government shuts down, Trump and the GOP will fully own it. The Washington Post. The current issue on the government shutdown is on the trending. The Washington Post, a renowned news source has obviously written to its effect. The piece about the government shut down, and Trump’s opinion on the issue has been addressed by the Washington post with a lot of caution. First of all, the main topic assumes the role of the main theme all the essay. The evidence supporting the facts that have been discussed is well supported by credible evidence. The evidence can be argued to be credible due to the fact that it includes some reported speech from the involved individuals themselves. Being a constitutional issue, the Washington Post has also supported its material with quotations from the constitution. Finally, the Washington Post has reported this issue with such tactic that the reader understands the message with the first reading. In fact, with only reading a short clause of the report on can be able to understand the whole message.
Laughland, Oliver, et al. “Government shutdown: Trump attacks Democrats and calls for ‘nuclear option.’” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 21 Jan. 2018.
The guardian is also another very outspoken source of news in the United States. One unique feature of the Guardian, reporting on the same topic is that the piece is short and direct to the point. Another unique feature is that the piece is a bit humorous. The report in the Guardian is supported by evidence which can be treated as a form of citation. The evidence includes a post by the president trump on social media regarding the issue of the government shut down. This piece is very evidence-based, making it looks like an analysis of evidence instead of a report. Obviously, the guardian is a profit-making organization, making it a bit vulnerable in terms of reporting the quality news. However, due to the amount of evidence applied, it is evident that the piece is very factual and realistic.
Hasson, Peter. “EXCLUSIVE: Trump Unafraid Of Possible Government Shutdown.” The Daily Caller, The Daily Caller, 31 Mar. 2017.
The most capturing thing about this report is its topic. The topic is chosen in a manner which one cannot miss. It is so intriguing that even if one was not necessarily aiming at reading the piece, they would find themselves checking on it anyway. The paragraphs are also constructed in the best way possible; brief and direct to the point. The issue of the government shutdown should obviously be a piece of news and not a platform for personal opinions. However, to some extent, the daily caller looks as if it is treating the issue like an opinion piece. One factor to support this is the fact that evidence is minimum and scarce. Additionally, even where evidence is attached, it is not precise. Therefore, the information on the post may not be very accurate, judging from the factors that ought to be considered. A positive aspect of the post, however, is that the ideas are well organized in a way that it would be very easy to grasp the main points and ideas without necessarily having to read the whole piece.
On the issue of the government shutdown, it is important to note most of the other sources indicate that a shutdown would be advantageous for president trump. However, the fiscal times suggests otherwise. This is especially displayed n the topic that the editor has given to the piece. With knowledge of this, it is apparent that for any reader who might have read from other sources might have doubts about the source after just reading the topic. However, there are some aspects which cannot be ignored. For instance, the source is very clear and precise. The message is clear, and the writer has a good command of the English language.
This particular source is best preferred for professionals. This is because the language used in writing down the text is in a way professional. The economic terms applied are not very preferred for the average reader. However, regardless of that, the source is still very good. The information has been put across in such a way that the reader will grasp the message just after reading a few sentences. The ideas are evidence-based, and as a matter of fact, they are factual and very realistic. However, at some point, the piece assumes some level of opinion based argument instead of going on as a news article, the more reason it is best for professionals.
This source, in particular, begins with evidence to support the content. The evidence, in this case, is a tweet b president trump with regard to the topic under question. All through the text, there is nothing else but discussing the tweet and then adding more evidence to the post. It is interesting how the post argues it’s pointing. The post is very independent and does not seem to be biased towards any side. However, there is something about how the ideas are arranged. The text has a lot of bulk in that the main message is hard to comprehend. At some point, the writer includes aspects opinions which seem baseless.
Unlike other sources which are brief and summarized, this source from BBC news is lengthy. In most cases, readers do not like to read very lengthy concepts. Therefore, the source was entirely wrong on that issue. However, as much as the text is lengthy, there are still some other numerous aspects of the text that makes it adorable. For instance, the way the ideas flow confirm that the source is not biased and the reports have a very high probability of being true. Another aspect is the issue of evidence. The post bears very credible evidence. A post that is supported by some substantial evidence is very pleasing to the eyes of the reader, who is the main priority. The test also applies some very simple language, another positive thing on the text. Readers generally prefer content which is simple to read and comprehend. All in all, the source qualifies to be among the best.
As a conclusion, it is apparent that among all the sources, the Washington Post would be the best and the most preferred source of information. There are many reasons explaining this choice. For one, the Washington Post is a reputable source of information and therefore it is apparent that its fame is not just for nothing. Another reason why the source is probably the best is that the piece satisfies almost all the six questions towards identifying a credible media platform. Additionally, the kind of language used by the writer is simple and comprehensible to almost each and every kind of person interested in reading the piece.
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled