SC/ST Reservation Not For All: [Essay Example], 436 words GradesFixer

Haven't found the right essay?

Get an expert to write your essay!


Professional writers and researchers


Sources and citation are provided


3 hour delivery

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.

Sc/st Reservation not for All

  • Category: Government, Law
  • Topic: Court
  • Page: 1
  • Words: 436
  • Published: 15 January 2019
  • Downloads: 14
Download Print

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay.

We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

Get your price

121 writers online

Download PDF

The Supreme Court will hear a petition to exclude the affluent members, or the creamy layer, of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes from the benefits of reservation. The members who earn a specified income should be subjected to a means test, a test conducted to scrutinise the value of assets of an individual claiming reservation in order to determine their eligibility.

A Bench led by Chief Justice of India, Dipak Misra, will hear the petition which states that the rich among the SCs/STs are “snatching away” the benefits, while the deserving and impoverished continue to “bite the dust.” It is due to the lack of percolation of benefits to the poor that has led to social unrest, Naxalite movements and perennial poverty, it says.This is the first time a petition has been filed, urging the Supreme Court to introduce the creamy layer concept for the SCs/STs. In 1992, a nine-judge Bench of the court in the Indra Sawhney case (Mandal case), upheld the caste-based reservation for the OBCs as valid.

The court also stated that the creamy layer of the OBCs should not get the benefits of reservation. The ruling, however, confined the exclusion of the creamy layer to the OBCs and not the SCs/STs. Now, the petition filed by Samta Andolan Samiti, which represents the poor strata of the SCs/STs in Rajasthan, wants the creamy layer of the SCs/STs excluded from the benefits.The petition, filed by advocate Shobhit Tiwari, refers to the Constitution Bench’s 2006 judgment in the M. Nagaraj case that the “means test should be taken into consideration to exclude the creamy layer from the group earmarked for reservation.”“The uplifted/affluent and advanced sections of the SCs/STs snatch away the maximum benefit and the 95% members of these communities are at a disadvantage.

The affluent among the SCs/STs are siphoning off the reservation benefits given to them by the State government as well as the Central government. The benefits of the reservation policy are not percolating down to the people who are in actual need of them,” the petition argues. This lack of percolation of quota benefits to the poorest of the poor ensures that the “weak always remains the weak and the fortunate layers consume the whole cake.” The rich get richer and the poor get poorer. The petition argues that no class or caste remained homogeneously backward across time.

The creamy and evolved layer of the SCs/STs benefits from the reservations and puts the people in acute need, in scarcity. The petition claims that only the backward portion of castes included in the list of SCs/STs alone is constitutionally entitled to the benefits of reservation.

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student.

Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

100% plagiarism free

Sources and citations are provided

Find Free Essays

We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

SC/ST Reservation Not For All. (2019, January 15). GradesFixer. Retrieved October 20, 2020, from
“SC/ST Reservation Not For All.” GradesFixer, 15 Jan. 2019,
SC/ST Reservation Not For All. [online]. Available at: <> [Accessed 20 Oct. 2020].
SC/ST Reservation Not For All [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2019 Jan 15 [cited 2020 Oct 20]. Available from:
copy to clipboard

Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you’d like this or any other sample, we’ll happily email it to you.

    By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails.


    Attention! this essay is not unique. You can get 100% plagiarism FREE essay in 30sec

    Recieve 100% plagiarism-Free paper just for 4.99$ on email
    get unique paper
    *Public papers are open and may contain not unique content
    download public sample

    Sorry, we cannot unicalize this essay. You can order Unique paper and our professionals Rewrite it for you



    Your essay sample has been sent.

    Want us to write one just for you? We can custom edit this essay into an original, 100% plagiarism free essay.

    thanks-icon Order now

    Hi there!

    Are you interested in getting a customized paper?

    Check it out!
    Having trouble finding the perfect essay? We’ve got you covered. Hire a writer uses cookies. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.