450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help you just now
Starting from 3 hours delivery
Remember! This is just a sample.
You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.Get custom essay
121 writers online
The representation of science is a trope often used in Gothic Literature. In this essay, I will compare how two Gothic texts, Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson and “The Stolen Bacillus” by H. G. Wells, represent science in terms of duplicitous personalities. I will examine how scientific thought on instinctual emotional responses and the idea of duality corresponds to the portrayal of science in Gothic Literature.
Charles Darwin (522) establishes a connection between how human beings and animals display emotions, suggesting “primitive” (523) responses emerge in human beings under certain emotional situations, such as the appearance of anger. Though many Gothic texts deal with Darwin’s observations, Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is possibly the most significant of these texts. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde are two different sides of the same character. They are seemingly opposite in every way including personality and appearance. Dr. Jekyll is portrayed as a moralistic man, while Mr. Hyde is described as an animalistic version of a human, “like some damned Juggernaut” (Stevenson 9). However, it becomes clear throughout the course of the text that Mr. Hyde is really just a repressed version of Dr. Jekyll. Jekyll uses Hyde as a mask for his own primeval instincts, which Darwin (523) would suggest are inherent instincts of all human beings. Hyde’s monstrosities are clearly evident through his appearance and distinctly evil conduct, but I would argue that Jekyll is the more monstrous of the two. He attempts to hide his monstrous nature under the guise of scientific enquiry when really his intention is to commit evil crimes, as Christina Schneider (5) posits, without the pressure of social and moral obligations.
Sigmund Freud (547) discusses the idea of the “double” in Gothic Literature as not only being two individuals that are alike, but also a singular individual with multiple aspects to their personality. Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde demonstrates Freud’s idea through the two characters that are actually one; Hyde is as much Jekyll as Jekyll is Hyde’s creator. Jekyll demonstrates a “doubling, dividing and interchanging of the self” (Freud 547) through his creation of Hyde as a reflection of his own darker, more primitive self as suggested by Darwin (523).
Freud’s double is also evident in “The Stolen Bacillus” through the characters of the Bacteriologist and the Anarchist. The Anarchist is portrayed as the obvious villain, with his appearance and gleeful demeanor at causing harm to others clear indications of his monstrous nature. The Bacteriologist, on the other hand, is portrayed as being slightly submissive and half-witted, but is considered in the texts as a good man. However, a closer reading of the text reveals the Bacteriologist’s hidden nature. He appears to enjoy possessing a harmful weapon, even giving a speech that poetically describes “death – mysterious, untraceable death, death swift and terrible, death full of pain and indignity” (Wells 409). But it is perhaps his suggestion of a great power that he has that reveals his true motivations. He implies his power over the bacillus through his ability to contain such a harmful disease, proclaiming, “Yes, here is the pestilence imprisoned” (409). Perhaps this is suggestive of his own “primitive” (Darwin 523) desires of power. He even admits to his wife his desire to “astonish” (Wells 412) the Anarchist with the deadly virus and acknowledges his own foolishness suggesting he is aware of his social and moral obligations (Schneider 5).
Keir Waddington discusses how “Gothic writers were fascinated by questions of identity and the idea that outward appearances concealed something sinister within” (59). This is in agreement with Darwin’s and Freud’s ideas about the duplicitous self; however, I would suggest that Gothic writers are interested in establishing the possibility for anyone to have sinister motivations not just those with the outward appearance of evilness. Dr. Jekyll is the prime example of this, outwardly he appears to be a respectable, moral citizen, but really this is a mere semblance for his true self, Mr. Hyde. Even the Bacteriologist in “The Stolen Bacillus” is shown to have darker ulterior motives, though not to the same extent as Dr. Jekyll. Both texts contain opposing characters, Jekyll versus Hyde and the Bacteriologist versus the Anarchist, and both texts contain opposing, or competing, motives within the same character, human versus animal and obligation versus power. While these sinister motives were obvious for the bad characters, they were not as clear for the supposed good characters; however, both Robert Louis Stevenson and H. G. Wells hinted at conflicting motivations for these characters before eventually revealing their own sinister motives.
Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde portrays the extreme version of the Freud’s (547) double and emphasizes the primal instincts that Darwin (523) attributes as inherent in all human beings. Hyde is the epitome of the monster, but it is Jekyll’s monstrous nature that is most shocking as he does not possess the “outward appearances” (Waddington 59) of a true monster, making him an even more terrifying prospect. “The Stolen Bacillus” also discusses Darwin’s (523) and Freud’s (547) ideas, but portrays a much less grim view of humanity than Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. While we do see primitive ulterior motives from the Bacteriologist, it is his ability recognize these motivations as wrong that makes him a foolish hero unlike the monstrous Jekyll. Gothic Literature uses scientific theory to establish a duplicitous self, implying that all human beings have an inherent ability to revert back to primitive motivations allowing for conflict within oneself.
Darwin, Charles. “From Charles Darwin, The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals (1872).” Gothic Evolutions: poetry, tales, context, theory. Ed. Corinna Wagner. Moorebank: NewSouth Books, 2014. Print.
Freud, Sigmund. “From Sigmund Freud, The Uncanny (1919).” Gothic Evolutions: poetry, tales, context, theory. Ed. Corinna Wagner. Moorebank: NewSouth Books, 2014. Print.
Schneider, Christina. “Monstrosity in the English Gothic Novel.” The Victorian 3.1 (2015): 1-11. Web. 27 August 2016.
Stevenson, Robert Louis. The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Ed. Katherine Linehan. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2003. Print.
Waddington, Keir. “More like Cooking than Science: Narrating the Inside of the British Medical Laboratory, 1800-1914.” Journal of Literature and Science 3.1 (2010): 50-70. Web. 27 August 2016.
Wells, H. G. “The Stolen Bacillus (1895).” Gothic Evolutions: poetry, tales, context, theory. Ed. Corinna Wagner. Moorebank: NewSouth Books, 2014. Print.
While the writer’s expression is clear and conciseness with which arguments are made is appreciated, there are nevertheless corrections that need to be made to improve the quality of the essay. Firstly, it is recommended that the writer should avoid the use of first person as this is not in accordance with the style of academic writing. The use of a hook sentence, and introduction to the texts, as well as the thesis statement is appropriate but it is suggested that the instruction should be explained in more detail in two or three sentences to provide more context to the thesis statement. Also, the writer should avoid stating in the thesis statement in terms of what the essay aims to do and instead express how the two texts represent science in terms of instinctual emotional responses and the idea of duality corresponds to the portrayal of science. The evidence presented is extensive and supports the arguments of the thesis statement very effectively. The writer should also consider improving further organization by adding subheadings and then explaining only one point under each paragraph. Word choice is effective and the writer’s expression is very clear. There are no problems in sentence construction.
We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:
Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you’d like this or any other sample, we’ll happily email it to you.
Attention! This essay is not unique. You can get a 100% Plagiarism-FREE one in 30 sec
Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.
Please check your inbox.
Want us to write one just for you? We can custom edit this essay into an original, 100% plagiarism free essay.Order now
Are you interested in getting a customized paper?Check it out!