By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
About this sample
About this sample
Words: 683 |
Pages: 2|
4 min read
Published: Dec 16, 2024
Words: 683|Pages: 2|4 min read
Published: Dec 16, 2024
When it comes to the topic of voting age, there's a longstanding debate that often resurfaces: should we raise the voting age from 18 to 21? It’s a question that ignites passions on both sides, and while there are compelling arguments for either stance, I believe raising the voting age is not only unnecessary but could potentially do more harm than good. In this essay, I will explore various facets of this discussion, including maturity levels, civic engagement, and historical context.
One of the most prominent arguments for raising the voting age revolves around maturity. Proponents argue that individuals at 18 are still too young to make informed decisions about complex political issues. They often point to brain development studies which suggest that critical thinking and impulse control continue to develop well into a person’s twenties. While it’s true that people mature at different rates, I would argue that turning 21 doesn’t automatically imbue someone with greater wisdom or understanding of political matters.
Consider this: many 18-year-olds are already taking on significant responsibilities—some are serving in the military, others are working full-time jobs or attending college. These experiences can foster critical thinking skills and a sense of responsibility that makes them quite capable of making informed voting decisions. Instead of pushing back the age limit, perhaps we should focus on improving education around civic responsibilities and current events for all young adults.
If we raise the voting age to 21, we run the risk of further disengaging younger citizens from the democratic process. Right now, young voters aged 18-24 have lower participation rates compared to older demographics; however, studies show that engaging individuals early in their political journey can lead to lifelong habits of civic participation. By allowing those who are just stepping into adulthood to vote at 18—at an age when they’re becoming increasingly aware of their rights and societal issues—we help instill a sense of responsibility toward their community.
Moreover, millennials and Generation Z have proven themselves as passionate advocates for change on various issues such as climate action and social justice. Keeping them engaged with these pressing topics through electoral participation could lead not only to higher turnout rates but also more informed discussions among peers about policies affecting their futures.
The voting age was lowered from 21 to 18 during a time when young Americans were being drafted into war without having any say in governmental decisions—a clear violation of democratic principles. The argument was straightforward: if you’re old enough to fight for your country, then you should be able to vote on its governance. This change recognized not only the contributions made by younger generations but also acknowledged their right to influence legislation impacting their lives directly.
Raising the voting age now would feel like taking a step backward—dismissing those contributions and rights earned through decades of struggle for equality in democracy. It raises questions about which demographic segments society values most regarding decision-making power in governance.
In addition to disengagement from politics among youth voters if we raised the minimum voting age—and possibly disenfranchising millions—it could send an unfortunate message about societal trust towards younger generations as capable decision-makers. This perception might seep into other aspects such as employment opportunities or educational endeavors where youth may already feel undervalued due purely based on their ages rather than abilities or perspectives offered.
While raising the voting age may seem like an appealing solution for some concerns related to maturity levels amongst voters today—the potential drawbacks far outweigh any perceived benefits associated with such changes! From ensuring continued engagement among our youngest citizens striving towards creating positive change in society—to honoring hard-fought victories over restrictive practices historically aimed at disenfranchising segments within communities—maintaining access remains essential! Instead let's work together towards fostering informed dialogue across all ages so everyone has voice behind ballot come election day!
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled