By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
About this sample
About this sample
Words: 757 |
Pages: 2|
4 min read
Published: Aug 1, 2024
Words: 757|Pages: 2|4 min read
Published: Aug 1, 2024
Charles Dickens' novel, Hard Times, explores the stark contrast between two characters, Sissy Jupe and Bitzer, who symbolize the opposing forces of imagination and utilitarianism. Throughout the text, Sissy and Bitzer embody distinct characteristics that highlight their differences in upbringing, values, and outlook on life. By examining their backgrounds, actions, and interactions with other characters, it becomes evident that Sissy represents compassion, empathy, and emotional intelligence, while Bitzer embodies practicality, logic, and a lack of human connection. The contrasting nature of these two characters serves as a commentary on the detrimental effects of a purely utilitarian society. This essay will analyze the key differences between Sissy and Bitzer, highlighting their contrasting personalities and the implications of their choices in the context of Dickens' Hard Times.
Sissy Jupe, a circus girl, and Bitzer, a student at Mr. Gradgrind's school, have significantly different backgrounds and upbringings. Sissy's upbringing in the circus allows her to develop a vibrant imagination, empathy, and a connection with nature and art. In contrast, Bitzer's education at the Gradgrind school emphasizes facts, statistics, and practical knowledge, leaving little room for imagination or emotional development. The author provides glimpses of their backgrounds to establish the foundation for their differing personalities and values.
Throughout the novel, Sissy's circus upbringing is portrayed as a source of warmth and emotional richness. For instance, when she is asked about her father, she mentions him as a "horse-riding father" rather than a "horse-riding gentleman," indicating her innocence and the genuine love she holds for her family. In contrast, Bitzer's cold and calculating nature is apparent in his response to the same question, as he states that his father is "thirty-one and a regularly made man" (Dickens 14). This stark contrast in their responses highlights Sissy's emotional connection and Bitzer's lack thereof.
Sissy and Bitzer's actions and interactions with other characters further exemplify their contrasting natures. Sissy's actions are driven by compassion, empathy, and a desire to help others. Her interactions with characters like Louisa Gradgrind and Rachel, the factory worker, demonstrate her ability to connect with people on an emotional level. Sissy's genuine concern for Louisa's well-being is evident when she confesses her worries to Gradgrind, stating, "I hope you may not come to be sorry for having trusted me" (Dickens 178). This showcases Sissy's emotional intelligence and her understanding of the consequences of her actions.
In contrast, Bitzer's actions are motivated by personal gain and a strict adherence to the rules. His interactions with characters like Tom Gradgrind and Bounderby highlight his lack of empathy and his willingness to exploit others for his benefit. Bitzer's betrayal of Tom by reporting him to Bounderby demonstrates his cold-heartedness and his lack of loyalty. Despite knowing the potential consequences, Bitzer calculates that it is in his best interest to expose Tom's wrongdoing. This interaction underscores Bitzer's adherence to the utilitarian ideals of self-interest and practicality.
The choices made by Sissy and Bitzer have far-reaching implications within the context of Hard Times. Sissy's choices align with the novel's critique of utilitarianism, as she consistently prioritizes human connection and emotional well-being over practicality. Her ability to empathize and understand others' needs allows her to form meaningful relationships and make a positive impact on those around her. In contrast, Bitzer's choices reflect the negative consequences of a purely utilitarian mindset. His lack of empathy and emotional intelligence lead him to prioritize personal gain and contribute to the overall dehumanization evident in the utilitarian society depicted in the novel.
Dickens uses Sissy and Bitzer as contrasting characters to highlight the damaging effects of a society that places excessive value on logic and practicality while neglecting the importance of human connection and emotional well-being. By embracing Sissy's compassionate nature and rejecting Bitzer's utilitarian mindset, Dickens encourages readers to recognize the significance of empathy and emotional intelligence in creating a more balanced and humane society.
In Charles Dickens' Hard Times, the characters of Sissy and Bitzer serve as representatives of the opposing forces of imagination and utilitarianism. Through their differing backgrounds, actions, and interactions, it becomes clear that Sissy embodies compassion, empathy, and emotional intelligence, while Bitzer represents practicality, logic, and a lack of human connection. The contrasting nature of these two characters serves as a critique of the harm caused by a society that prioritizes utilitarian ideals at the expense of emotional well-being. By examining the choices and implications of these characters, Dickens invites readers to reflect on the value of empathy and emotional intelligence in creating a more balanced and humane society.
Dickens, Charles. Hard Times. Penguin Classics, 2003.
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled