The Issue of Social Stratification and Gender

Gender is socially built and a consequence of social cultural impacts all through a person's development. Gender identity can be affected by, and is not the same as one society to another depending on the member of the society assess the role females and male. Our gender identity can be affected from the ethnicity of the group, their family values and religion. Gender is a structural feature of society and gender is a devise by which society controls its members.

Women have never been in a more grounded position to lead, change and shape the monetary, social and political scene. All through the majority of recorded history and around the world, women have taken a "back seat" to men. As a rule, men have had, more physical and social power and status than women, especially in the public arena. Men tend to be more aggressive and violent then women. Likewise, boys are often required to attain proof of masculinity through strenuous effort.

This creates laws and rules, defining society, and—some feminists might add—controlling women. For example, not until this century were women in the United States allowed to own property, vote ND testify in the court of law, or serve as a jury member. Male dominance in a society is termed power. Whereas in recent decades’ major strides toward gender equality have been made, sociologists are quick to point out that inequalities in the United States are ever to be eliminated.

Behind much of the inequalities seen in education, the workplace, and politics is sexism, or prejudice because of gender. Sexism is the assumption that men are superior to women. Sexism has always had negative consequences for women. It has caused some women to avoid pursuing successful careers typically described as they are less desirable as spouses or mothers, or even less feminine. Sexism has also caused women to feel inferior to men or to rate themselves negatively. The 21st century has seen a sensational move in "traditional" family flow and greater acknowledgment of gender in enactment has helped pull apart gender role divisions. Thus women are significantly more economically free and socially autonomous, representing to 42% of the UK workforce and 55% of college graduates.

However, women are still less improbable than men to be related with leadership positions in the UK. In recent reports 2.4 million jobless women said that they need to find employment, and nine out of 10 people wants to see men and women similarly represented in leadership. If the intention to chance is the goal is there, and fundamental social and political system support women in the workforce, at that point we have to look facts and figures to build up what other factors contribute to the gaping hole on the gender equity. For instance, similar to the dress code we having for kids can also be seen with adults, especially in the colors, fabrics and designs specific to each gender.

Another example is the circumstance of a female working in the business field that is expected to dress in masculine way in order to be considered successful and to be taken more seriously. This could exhibit again how social influences affect gender expectations and practices and standard with respect to gender. For instance, people think men as more capable they are rewarded more highly than women just having a male identity they having more chances to get the job but, if you are a house wife or mother, your chances of getting the job are reduced.