close
test_template

Nature of Revenge in The Novel The Frankenstein

Human-Written
download print

About this sample

About this sample

close
Human-Written

Words: 1228 |

Pages: 3|

7 min read

Published: Jul 17, 2018

Essay grade:
Satisfactory
arrow downward Read Review

Words: 1228|Pages: 3|7 min read

Published: Jul 17, 2018

Essay grade:
Satisfactory
arrow downward Read Review

It makes your blood boil. Your eyes see red. Your fists clench so hard that they turn pale. It keeps you up at night, thinking and formulating plots on how to extract it. It flows through your body and mind like an uncontrollable rage, seething to be released. Revenge is toxic. And such a strong, violent emotion is fueled by a single act: an act of betrayal. Yet its effects are so lasting that it inflames wars of all sorts, from between two individuals to between two nations. But oddly enough, this terrifying emotion has been the focus of many artists and authors, not because of its consequences but because of how intriguing it is. Despite its ferocity, revenge is perhaps one of the most humane emotions, on par with (and often going hand in hand with) love. One such author, Mary Shelley, exemplifies the very essence of revenge in her novel Frankenstein. In her novel, the protagnoist, Victor Frankenstein, is faced with continual conflict with his creation, the creature, creating an obsessive cycle of anger and disgust that inevitably leads both to their demise.

The cycle begins when Frankenstein first abandons the creature out of disgust, as soon as he creates the creature. Once the creature comes to realize this, he is angered. Frankenstein brought him into the world and abandonded him immediately simply because of his physical appearance. In one of his raging fits, the creature says “Frankenstein! You belong then to my enemy – to him towards whom I have sworn eternal revenge; you shall be my first victim” (130). Here, the creature reveals an important aspect of his mindset. He does not think of Frankenstein as the only enemy; instead, he thinks of Frankenstein as part of it. In other words, the creature’s desire for revenge is directed towards all of mankind, to which Frankenstein is a part of, rather than solely Frankenstein. This gives insight into one of the consequences of revenge: cloudy thinking. If the creature could think calmly and logically, he would realize that his misery is a result of solely Frankenstein and no one else’s actions. But regardless, from this point onwards, the creature has an innate hatred of all humanity, especially Frankenstein, that guides all his actions. Frankenstein, getting angered by the creature threats, retorts with his own anger-filled response. “I will work at your destruction until I desolate your heart so that you shall curse the hour of your birth” (134). Like the creature, Frankenstein does not put lucid thought to his words; if he thought from the creature’s perspective, he would have realized that the creature is justly angered. But instead, Frankenstein decides to throw threats back at the creature, illustrating that the emotion of anger brings both of them to the same mental level.

But more than just producing irrational thought, vengeance has an obsessive nature that eclipses other emotions and morals. It can transform a mind that knows nothing but innocence to one filled with hatred and loathing, just as it did with the creature. When first brought to life, the creature knew nothing; he could not speak, let alone have a grasp of human emotion and complex thought. But as he spent time learning how to speak English and adapting to human personalities, he came to realize his state of abandonment. “Cursed, cursed creator! Why did I live? Why, in that instant, did I not extinguish the spark of existence which you had so wantonly bestowed? I know not; despair had not yet taken possession of me’ my feelings were those of rage and revenge” (124). As he realizes this, the creature starts transforming from one that accidentally harms a little girl to one that that willingly kills Victor’s brother William just because of their relation. The creature’s obsession with revenge is further shown when he states that “revenge kept me alive; I dared not die and leave my adversary in being” (189). In other words, the creature has become a being whose sole existence is to extract vengeance rather than to try to fit into the society that fearfully rejected him. Furthermore, he refers to Victor as his “adversary” in life, instead of by his name or as his creator, suggesting the complete lack of respect and the embodiment of hatred the creature has towards him. At this state, the creature has reached his lowest point and gives up on trying to control his life; instead he seeks solace in controlling Victor’s.

Through both the creature and Victor’s quest for vengeance, the two inevitably lead each other towards mutual destruction. The escalating misery the creature causes on Victor’s life eventually leads to Victor breaking down and falling ill. Once he is nursed back to health, the creature confronts him, explaining his loneliness and sadness in the world in a calm, logical manner. He then finishes with the demand that it only be fair that Victor create a female counterpart for the creature, and if he does so, the creature would forgive Victor for his abandonment by leaving him—along with the rest of humanity—alone. As Victor debates it, the creature angrily adds “If you refuse, I will glut the maw of death until it be satiated with the blood of your remaining friends” (86). The creature’s scope for revenge has become so large that he now is willing to kill all of those related to Frankenstein to give him a slow, painful death. In other words, Frankenstein has no option but to comply to the creature or kill him. However, the creature is incredibly strong and agile, so Victor cannot kill him; this leaves him with one option: to comply. But once Victor comes close to creating this female counterpart, he realizes that he cannot bring another “creature” into the world and that one was already too many, so he kills the female. The creature sees this and, as promised, kills Elizabeth on the two’s wedding night. At this crossroad, both of their demises become inevitable. Victor needs the creature’s approval to live a happy life without having to fear for himself and his loved ones. The creature needs Victor if he wants any chance of another being like him to be created. But once both of them kill each other’s potential “wives”, they go down a road of immeasurable hate towards each other. Both of them need each other to live but neither of the two has each other’s approval. Therefore, Victor’s death on the boat, followed by the creature’s acceptance of his own death was unavoidable.

Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.

Through escalating acts of violence and hatred, Victor and the creature’s obsessive nature of showing anger led to each’s demise. Both needed each other to survive yet had to go through an incredible amount of pain and heartbreak as a result of the other, so the pair’s end was inevitable. Ironically symbolic, Shelley emphasizes the two’s foil-like nature and cyclic acts of anger by starting the book with the creature’s birth and ending with Victor’s death. Yet it is the creature who ends the novel with humanity as he comes to terms with his rash acts of anger while Victor never could. All in all, vengeance, like a disease, will consume and kill you if left unchecked. As clergyman Douglas Horton once said, “While seeking revenge, dig two graves—one for yourself.”

Image of Dr. Charlotte Jacobson
This essay was graded by
Dr. Charlotte Jacobson
Essay’s grade:
Satisfactory
What’s grading
minus plus
Expert Review
The essay on the essence of revenge in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is generally well-organized and focused on its topic. However, it has some issues with sentence structure, grammar, and voice that detract from its overall quality. It could be improved by focusing on clearer sentence structure and grammar, as well as by offering more original analysis and insight into the novel's themes and ideas.
minus plus
What can be improved
One of the main issues with the essay is its sentence structure, which is often convoluted and confusing. For example, the first sentence of the second paragraph reads: "The sequence of events and emotions that drive the creature to commit the heinous acts against his creator that he does, serve to highlight the overwhelming power of revenge in the novel." This sentence is unnecessarily long and difficult to follow, with several clauses and phrases competing for attention. Similarly, the first sentence of the third paragraph is similarly long and complicated: "The creature’s desire for revenge consumes him and leads him to commit several heinous acts against his creator, culminating in the murder of Victor’s best friend, Henry Clerval." There are also several issues with grammar and voice. For example, in the second paragraph, the author writes, "The monster’s overwhelming desire for revenge against Victor, which is what drives him to commit the heinous acts that he does, illustrates the destructive power of revenge." The use of the word "monster" instead of "creature" suggests a lack of familiarity with the novel's terminology, and the sentence structure is awkward and unclear. Finally, while the essay is generally well-focused on its topic, it lacks depth and originality. The author relies heavily on plot summary and does not offer much in the way of original analysis or insight. For example, the conclusion reads: "Ultimately, Shelley uses the creature’s revenge as a warning against the destructive power of this emotion." This observation is not particularly insightful or original, and it does not offer much in the way of a deeper understanding of the novel's themes or ideas.

Cite this Essay

Nature of Revenge in the Novel the Frankenstein. (2018, May 25). GradesFixer. Retrieved November 19, 2024, from https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/the-essence-of-revenge-in-mary-shelleys-frankenstein/
“Nature of Revenge in the Novel the Frankenstein.” GradesFixer, 25 May 2018, gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/the-essence-of-revenge-in-mary-shelleys-frankenstein/
Nature of Revenge in the Novel the Frankenstein. [online]. Available at: <https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/the-essence-of-revenge-in-mary-shelleys-frankenstein/> [Accessed 19 Nov. 2024].
Nature of Revenge in the Novel the Frankenstein [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2018 May 25 [cited 2024 Nov 19]. Available from: https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/the-essence-of-revenge-in-mary-shelleys-frankenstein/
copy
Keep in mind: This sample was shared by another student.
  • 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
  • Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours
Write my essay

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

close

Where do you want us to send this sample?

    By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

    close

    Be careful. This essay is not unique

    This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

    Download this Sample

    Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

    close

    Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

    close

    Thanks!

    Please check your inbox.

    We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

    clock-banner-side

    Get Your
    Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

    exit-popup-close
    We can help you get a better grade and deliver your task on time!
    • Instructions Followed To The Letter
    • Deadlines Met At Every Stage
    • Unique And Plagiarism Free
    Order your paper now