The Interconnection Between Education and Politics

Training is the inevitable part of everyone’s life. It is an important medium to gain essential knowledge and skills. Education and politics play a crucial role in every field of the life. Likewise, both makes the world better and are important for better living standards and citizenships. Although, education and politics share very close and strong relationship bond together. As in democracy, education is a kind of prerequisite for the success of the politician. Government officials offers the vision of the kind of society they need, and trainig has been the significant method of accomplishing it.

Although it is obvious that education and politics are interrelated, there is little doubt that education is strongly correlated with political attitudes and behaviours in Western societies. Highly educated actors participate more intensively in politics, they have higher levels of political interest and knowledge and they are more tolerant and trusting. All the available evidence therefore suggests that education is, or has become, the main gateway to political involvement.

There is considerable disagreement, however, on how exactly this gateway operates. While some authors argue that education has a direct impact on value patterns and skills, others claim that the importance attached to education experiences is overrated. Cindy Kam and Carl Palmer, for example, state that education should be considered as a mere proxy variable. They argue that specific sets of background variables such as parental and individual characteristics not only lead to more intense political involvement but also allow for access to higher education. Privileged groups or children of privileged parents are more likely to attain higher education levels, but according to these authors, it would be erroneous to ascribe any causal effect to these educational experiences. In this approach, education is little more than an indication for already existing patterns of stratification and social inequality.

Thus far, this debate about the exact nature of educational effects has not led to any final conclusion, partly because of a lack of data. The question of whether college education experiences have an added effect, beyond the stratification that is already present upon entering higher education, requires panel data that are scarce in political science. Indeed, the entire debate that has followed the publication of the Kam and Palmer (2008) article is almost exclusively based on an analysis of panel data that by now are a few decades old. Since that period, patterns of access to higher education have changed dramatically. Furthermore, thus far the study of higher education effects is concentrated on political participation as a dependent variable, while we can assume that colleges and university campuses often serve as a recruiting ground for acts of participation, thus blurring lines of causality. To avoid this potential ground of contamination, we focus on a political attitude, namely political trust that is less dependent on this kind of context effect. We also build on new and recent panel data that were collected in Belgium over the period 2006–11, and these data allow us to determine how exactly higher education experiences are related to political attitudes.

Education is a process of facilitating learning, knowledge, skills, and values, believes and habits. The possibility of crucial preparing is let at beginning stage: assorted people have particular wisdom about it. Some view essential education as fundamental instruction and other consider proficiency as fundamental education.

The idea of essential instruction suggests the will to set up the whole population for everyday life in a solid way. As a formal administration, essential education implies essential tutoring and some of the time a couple of years of auxiliary cycle. As a non-formal administration, it contains the educational exercises intended for those areas of population, where there is no educational foundation. Be that as it may, the inquiry might be asked, whether their tutoring or no formal exercises tastefully answer the prerequisites of fundamental education or not?

Essential instruction went for acquisitions of primary information and skill necessary for life in a general public can be termed as fundamental education. These aptitudes may incorporate education and innumeracy of social life and abilities of comprehension of group life. Important for dependable participation in general public under this sneak peak, fundamental education includes all formal and non-formal essential instruction gave by government, and NGO.

Fundamental education must give an educational least: procurement of educational least relies on upon requirements of the human beings expended and the assets accessible to the group.

To conclude, education is the process that helps make the individual better and teaches them a lot about the morals and broadens the understanding level of the individual. So, education plays a significant role in making the person a good and effective politician for the nation to make the community better and strong. Also, proper education and understanding matters a lot for the politician to earn a good repute in the country and among its citizens.