The Role of Judiciary in The Liberal Democracy

In a liberal democracy, the judiciary has four main responsibilities, including responding to judgments, resolving disputes, examining legality, and defining the rule of law through the interpretation and application of laws that become athletes in state politics . To accomplish these four tasks, the basic principles of a liberal democratic state must be maintained along with legitimate democracy and national principles. In addition, the judiciary should interpret and apply the law along with the Constitution, and provide fair rulings on disputes between state, individual, individual, and various levels of government within the government.

Relying on courts and judicial means to deal with core moral dilemmas, political debates and public policy issues is one of the most significant consequences of the government in the late 20th and early 20th centuries. Through a newly enacted judicial review, high courts around the world are working to address a variety of issues ranging from freedom of expression, freedom of religion, freedom of reproductive and privacy, equitable rights, criminal justice, education, public policy on trial and trial I was asked frequently. As the political importance of the courts has increased, it has become more widespread than ever before, and it has expanded to become a pluralistic phenomenon that far exceeds policy decisions of the current 'standard' concept.

The role of the judiciary in the community is not just what the judge does, but also in the way he acts. This is called judicial style. The judge style of civil law jurisdiction and the judge style of common law tradition are distinctly different. In recent years, there has been a claim of responsible responsibility for all government agencies. There is a need to harmonize with the principle of independence of the government. Many people are investing in the courts, and people have the right to consider cases in a fair and efficient manner, to make decisions relatively quickly, and to manage cases with due consideration.

To achieve the characteristics of the judiciary, democracy in developed countries depended on the "culture of the judiciary". When a judge comes into the office, he pledges to maintain the rights of all citizens and combines Constitution, self-integrity, peer pressure and public inquiry to ensure that at least the highest-level judge follows his oath. There is a need to strive to achieve a complex and balanced balance, which will promote the growth and development of reasonable and sound principles in accordance with the new law. The legislature should also be aware that the judiciary is a party to many disputes between the citizens and the representatives that it has to deal with and therefore can not influence the operation of the courts and the selection of staff. The legislature must acknowledge that it is for that purpose, for example, to represent citizens and act within the structure in accordance with the rules laid down in the Constitution.

The role of the judiciary in formulating or applying the policy is a matter of extended association, far beyond judicial review of administrative decisions. When policy formation is considered to be a part of judicial function, it is important to understand that it is ongoing and that it is understandable how judicial methods are related to judicial and judicial capacity. Along with the development of common law, there is responsibility for the development of judges who follow the judge's wisdom and proposed changes in response to changing needs as well as appropriate pressure for rationalization. They accomplish this within the discipline of their own discipline.

Another problem that weighs is the changing attitude of law professions and other on the use of litigation as a technique to achieve political and social goals. We have long been accustomed to using litigation as a weapon in corporate and commercial competition, but we are soaring in a situation that can be explained as politically or socially aggressive litigation. This has also brought about a change in personality that precedes some courts and has a significant impact on how courts appear to act to the public.

As a democratic society, we have seen significant changes in the relationship between individuals and nations. The judiciary has the knowledge and experience to make a tremendous contribution to the maintenance and continued evolution of a democratic society. The Court's role as a dispute solicitor, a lawyer's interpreter and constitutional guardian is to be completely separate from the authority and function of all other participants in the court system.