By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
About this sample
About this sample
Words: 558 |
Page: 1|
3 min read
Published: Mar 3, 2020
Words: 558|Page: 1|3 min read
Published: Mar 3, 2020
Piraq Causa, meaning “who’s to blame”, is a feature in the “Arts of Resistance” exhibit at UBC’s Museum of Anthropology. This series of 5 paintings depicts the Shining Path conflicts of Peru, events which resulted in 69 000 people, largely made up of innocent indigenous villagers, being killed. It is the story of the villagers of Ayacucho that these paintings illustrate. The traditional style that these works are painted in, called tablas pintadas, was originally used to depict family genealogy, but are being used in the context of these paintings to illustrate the collective history of the culture during this time. They are intended to denounce the horrors committed against them, as well as to rebel against the erasure of their culture by the Peruvian government.
The initial goal of these paintings was to condemn the atrocities committed against the Ayacuchano people. As one of the poorest indigenous communities in Peru, Ayacucho was easily infiltrated by the Shining Path insurgents. Though public perception was that the villagers supported the movement, the paintings tell a different story. Indeed, they refer to the Shining Path leaders as onqoy, a plague or sickness on the community. This is significant as it runs contrary to the official position of Peru, which labeled Ayacuchanos as terrorists in an effort to justify the massacres. Perhaps the most horrific scene painted depicts military helicopters gunning down everyone in sight, guerillas and civilians alike. So focused was the government on eradicating the Shining Path that they completely disregarded the innocents who were unable to defend themselves from the attack. As illustrated through the callous indifference the government had towards indigenous life, it’s clear that they did not care if the Ayacuchan culture survived.
The Ayacuchanos, however, do care. The use of the tablas pintadas method is the artist’s way of showing that no matter what, their culture will persevere. More than just the killing of the Ayacuchano people, the conflicts (which disproportionately affected indigenous peoples) were a form of cultural genocide. A specific example from the paintings shows the Peruvian military destroying the Ayacucho community center as a way of targeting the Shining Path. However, the insurgents had no vested interest in the community, and therefore the only people who were affected were the villagers whose cultural history had just been wiped out. After the conflicts, the remaining Ayacuchanos scattered themselves around Peru, leading to a loss of their customs. Through the use of traditional techniques, the artists are preserving a part of their culture and rebelling against a government that has marginalized and attacked them. Even as recently as 2017, the Lima Museum was criticized for showing these pieces, as they are seen as pro-terrorist. As Schaffer and Smith observe, life narratives are “often banned in their country of origin,” (16) as they typically reflect negatively on the country itself.
The Piraq Causa paintings displayed in UBC’s Museum of Anthropology depict the atrocities committed against indigenous groups during the Shining Path conflicts. They challenge the official rhetoric of the Peruvian government which paints the indigenous people as insurgents, supporters of the cause who had to be stopped. Not only do these paintings bear witness to the extreme actions taken by the government and the Shining Path, they are also a way for the Ayacuchanos to preserve their culture through the use of traditional techniques.
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled