The Dilemma of to Live Or not to Live

For some people, suicide represents sacrifice, for love, for religion, or for politics. For others, it is was an escape, an escape from the Earth’s prison which we were in since birth. Judging whether life is or is not worth living amounts to answering the question of philosophy. This is a question one must first answer. For example, you can appreciate the importance of that reply, for it will anticipate the definitive act. These are facts the heart can feel; yet they call for careful study before they become clear to the intellect. I believe that everyone should live their life to the fullest.

Galileo, who held a scientific truth of great importance, denies it with the greatest ease as soon as it endangered his life. That truth was not worth the stake. Whether the Earth or the sun revolves around the other is a matter of extreme unconcern. On the other hand, I see many people die because they judge that life is not worth living. Others getting killed for the ideas or illusions that give them a reason for living. On all important problems there are probably two methods of thought, the method of La Palisse and the method of Don Quixote. In a subject that was so humble and so heavy with emotion, one can see, to a more modest attitude of mind obtaining at one and the same time from common sense and understanding.

Suicide has never been considered with except as a social occurrence. On the opposing side, there is concern with the relationship between an individual’s thought and suicide, An act like this is prepared with the silence of the heart and mind. The man himself is ignorant of it. “Beginning to think is beginning to undermined.” Society has little connections with such beginnings. “The worm is in the man’s heart,” that is where it much be wanted. One has to follow and understand this deadly game that leads from clarity in the face of existence to light. When it’s too hard to fix instantly, a step would be when the mind decides for death. It is easier to say that from the act itself, the consequences it will imply. It is confessing that life is too much for you, and that the mind’s thoughts are slowly taking over you. Living naturally was never easy and you will continue making actions for existence, the first is known as a habit. Dying voluntarily says that you already recognized, the ridiculous character of that habit, the insane character, the uselessness of suffering. After is what known as the “immeasurable feeling” that denies the mind of the sleep necessary to life. A world that manages to explain the bad reasons of life. On the other side, in a universe filled with illusions and light, one will feel like a stranger. It leaves will regret since it is from the memory of lost home or the hope of once a beautiful land. This becomes the separation between one and it’s life, the actor and his setting, the kid and his toys, the feeling of foolishness. All humans will have the thought of their own death, it can be realized without any other explanation that there is a direct connection between this feeling and the desire for death.

People in society today, play with words and pretend to believe that refusing to contribute a meaning of life will lead to declaring that it is not worth living. One has to refuse to be shot with confusions, divorces, and the discrepancy previously said. One has to brush everything away and go to the real problem. One has to kill oneself because life is not worth living, that is the truth yet a devastating one because it is truism. Does it’s saying require one to leave hope or suicide? Is suicide what must be explained and ended? This problem must be given priority over other issues, outside thoughts and all disinterest in a mind. Meaning to shade, that a mind is “objective” and can also introduce problem that have no place in this chase and this passion. It says simply for an adjust in words, logical thought that it would never be easy. It may seem to be easy to logical, but when it goes to the end, it will almost seem impossible. One who dies by their own mind and hand will follow it’s ending to their emotional desires. My reflection of suicide raises one question, is there a logic to the point of death? I will never know unless I try, without passion in the light of evidence. When Karl Jaspers revealed the impossibility of establishing the world as a unity says “This limitation leads me to myself, where I can no longer withdraw behind an objective point of view that I am merely representing, where neither I myself nor the existence of others can any longer become an object for me,” he is saying that after many others though it reaches its limits.

After many others, it did, but how determined they were to get out of them. Many people arrived and even some of the humblest, they step down to what is most precious to them, their families, and their life. Others, step down similarly but they initiated the suicide of the thoughts in rebellion. The effort is to stay there rather go so far that it is nearly impossible, and to examine closest of distant regions. The mind can analyze just then the figures of a basic yet quiet room before illustrating them and relieving them itself.