By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
About this sample
About this sample
Words: 531 |
Page: 1|
3 min read
Published: Aug 1, 2024
Words: 531|Page: 1|3 min read
Published: Aug 1, 2024
Tragedy has long been associated with the great figures of history, the noble and the elite. However, Arthur Miller's essay, "Tragedy And The Common Man," challenges this notion by arguing that the essence of tragedy lies within the common man. Miller contends that tragedy is not exclusive to those in positions of power, but rather, it is a reflection of the human experience that transcends social status. By examining Miller's perspective, we can gain a deeper understanding of tragedy and its connection to the common man.
Miller begins his essay by discussing the classical definition of tragedy, which centers around the downfall of a noble protagonist. He argues that this definition is limiting and fails to capture the true essence of tragedy. According to Miller, tragedy should not be confined to the elite, but should encompass the everyday struggles and triumphs of ordinary people. He states, "I think the tragic feeling is evoked in us when we are in the presence of a character who is ready to lay down his life, if need be, to secure one thing - his sense of personal dignity" (Miller, 1949). In other words, tragedy is not just about the external circumstances of a character, but also about their internal struggle for self-respect and dignity.
To support his argument, Miller provides examples from history and literature, such as the tragic hero Willy Loman from his play "Death of a Salesman." Loman is not a noble or powerful figure, but an ordinary man trying to make a living and provide for his family. Miller asserts that Loman's story resonates with audiences because it reflects the universal human desire for success and the fear of failure. Loman's tragedy is not just his own, but also that of the common man who can relate to his struggles and aspirations.
Moreover, Miller explores the role of tragedy in contemporary society. He suggests that tragedy has evolved over time and no longer solely revolves around the downfall of kings and queens. Instead, it encompasses a wider range of experiences, including the struggles of the working class and the marginalized. Miller argues that tragedy is not limited to a specific time or place, but is a timeless and universal concept that speaks to the human condition. He states, "The tragic mode is archaic, fit only for the very highly placed, the kings or the kingly" (Miller, 1949). By expanding the definition of tragedy, Miller challenges the traditional hierarchy of tragedy and invites us to reevaluate our understanding of the human experience.
In conclusion, Arthur Miller's essay "Tragedy And The Common Man" challenges the conventional definition of tragedy by asserting that it is not exclusive to the noble and powerful, but rather, it is a reflection of the universal human experience. Miller argues that tragedy is not limited to the downfall of kings and queens, but can be found in the struggles and triumphs of ordinary people. Through his exploration of the common man as a tragic figure, Miller invites us to reconsider our understanding of tragedy and its implications for society. By recognizing the potential for tragedy in all individuals, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the complexity and depth of the human experience.
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled