By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
About this sample
About this sample
Words: 687 |
Pages: 2|
4 min read
Published: Jun 13, 2024
Words: 687|Pages: 2|4 min read
Published: Jun 13, 2024
Imagine being faced with an unbearable dilemma: having to choose between the life of your closest friend and your own survival. This is the predicament that George Milton, the protagonist of John Steinbeck's novella Of Mice and Men, finds himself in. The question arises: was George justified in killing Lennie? In this essay, we will explore the complex dynamics of George and Lennie's relationship, analyze the events that led to George's decision, and ultimately argue that George's actions were indeed justified.
Topic Sentence: To understand George's justification for killing Lennie, it is crucial to examine the unique bond between the two characters.
Supporting Evidence: George and Lennie's friendship is characterized by a profound sense of responsibility for each other's well-being. From the very beginning of the novella, it is evident that George feels a duty to protect Lennie, who has a cognitive disability. When George recollects how Lennie got them into trouble at their previous job, he says, "I got you to look after me, and you got me to look after you" (Steinbeck 14). This mutual reliance and interdependence form the foundation of their relationship.
Analysis: The depth of George's care for Lennie is further emphasized by the sacrifices he makes to ensure Lennie's safety. Despite the challenges that Lennie's presence brings, George willingly takes on the role of his caretaker. This responsibility is not only a burden but also an expression of George's love and loyalty towards Lennie. Thus, when evaluating George's decision to kill Lennie, it is crucial to consider the weight of this bond and the moral dilemma it presents.
Topic Sentence: The tragic events that unfold throughout the novella provide context for George's actions.
Supporting Evidence: Lennie's lack of understanding and impulse control repeatedly lead to disastrous consequences. His unintentional killing of small animals and, ultimately, the death of Curley's wife illustrate the danger he poses to himself and those around him. Moreover, the pervasive prejudice and lack of understanding towards individuals with disabilities in the 1930s make it unlikely that Lennie would receive any form of leniency or rehabilitation if caught by the authorities.
Analysis: George is acutely aware of the potential consequences that Lennie's actions may have. He knows that, if discovered, Lennie would face a harsh and unforgiving punishment. By taking matters into his own hands, George not only spares Lennie from a painful fate but also acts as a compassionate advocate for his friend. The decision to end Lennie's life can be seen as an act of mercy, protecting him from further suffering and providing a measure of control over his own destiny.
Topic Sentence: George's decision to kill Lennie is also influenced by the impact it has on the other characters in the novella.
Supporting Evidence: The final act, although tragic, serves as a catalyst for change among the remaining characters. Slim, a wise and respected ranch hand, understands the complexity of the situation and consoles George by saying, "You hadda, George. I swear you hadda" (Steinbeck 107). This acknowledgment suggests that George's decision was not only justified but also recognized as the most compassionate course of action.
Analysis: George's action of killing Lennie prompts reflection and introspection among the other characters. It forces them to confront the harsh realities of their circumstances and question the society that has failed to provide proper support and care for individuals like Lennie. In this way, George's decision transcends the personal and acquires broader significance, shedding light on the systemic issues of the time.
In conclusion, the question of whether George was justified in killing Lennie is a complex and morally challenging one. However, considering the profound bond between the characters, the tragic events that unfolded, and the impact it had on the other characters, it becomes clear that George's actions were indeed justified. By examining the unique dynamics of George and Lennie's relationship, the novella Of Mice and Men offers insights into the complexities of morality and the lengths one might go to protect those they love. Furthermore, Steinbeck's work invites us to reflect on society's treatment of individuals with disabilities and the need for compassion and understanding in such circumstances.
Steinbeck, John. Of Mice and Men. Penguin Books, 1994.
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled