By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
About this sample
About this sample
Words: 701 |
Pages: 2|
4 min read
Published: Jun 13, 2024
Words: 701|Pages: 2|4 min read
Published: Jun 13, 2024
From the opening pages of John Steinbeck's classic novel, Of Mice and Men, it is clear that the bond between George and Lennie is profound and unique. However, this bond is tested when George is faced with a difficult decision: whether or not to kill Lennie. In this essay, we will delve into the reasons behind George's actions and explore the moral implications of his decision. Ultimately, we will argue that George's choice to shoot Lennie was driven by a combination of mercy, self-preservation, and the desire to spare Lennie from a more tragic fate at the hands of others.
One of the primary reasons why George decided to shoot Lennie stems from the immense responsibility he feels for his friend's well-being. Throughout the novel, it becomes evident that Lennie possesses a childlike innocence and a limited mental capacity, which often leads him into situations where he unintentionally causes harm. George realizes that Lennie's actions, although unintentional, can have severe consequences, as evidenced by the incident in Weed where Lennie's inappropriate touch led to dire outcomes.
In addition to the potential harm Lennie poses to others, George also recognizes the immense burden of constantly looking after him. This burden is further amplified by the hardships of the Great Depression era, where resources are scarce, and survival is a constant struggle. As George himself states, "I ain't got no people. I seen the guys that go around on the ranches alone. That ain't no good" (Steinbeck 13). George's decision to shoot Lennie can be seen as an act of mercy, sparing his friend from a life of constant hardship and potential mistreatment.
While George's love for Lennie is evident, self-preservation is another significant factor that drives his decision to shoot him. Throughout the novel, it is clear that George recognizes the potential consequences of Lennie's actions, both for himself and for Lennie. When Lennie accidentally kills Curley's wife, George understands that their dream of owning a farm is shattered, and their lives will be forever changed.
Furthermore, George is aware that Lennie's actions will likely lead to his capture or death at the hands of others. This is foreshadowed earlier in the novel when Candy's old dog is put down, as Carlson suggests, "Got no teeth, damn near blind, can't eat. Candy, you can have any of them pups you want. I had him so long. Had him since he was a pup. I herded sheep with him" (Steinbeck 45). In this instance, Carlson's insistence on shooting the dog reflects the harsh reality of survival in a world where the weak are discarded. George's decision to shoot Lennie can thus be seen as an attempt to protect his friend from a similar fate.
While George's decision to shoot Lennie may seem harsh, it is ultimately an act of mercy. Throughout the novel, Lennie's actions are driven by his inability to understand the consequences of his actions and the harm he unintentionally causes. When George realizes that Lennie's death is inevitable, he takes it upon himself to ensure that his friend's end is quick and relatively painless.
Moreover, George's choice to shoot Lennie can be seen as a way to spare him from a more tragic fate. With the knowledge that Curley and the other ranch workers are out for revenge, George understands that Lennie's demise will likely be brutal and drawn-out. By taking matters into his own hands, George ensures that Lennie's death is swift and, in a way, dignified.
In conclusion, George's decision to shoot Lennie was driven by a complex mix of mercy, self-preservation, and the desire to spare his friend from a more tragic fate. The bond between George and Lennie, while strong, is tested throughout the novel, ultimately leading George to take this drastic action. By analyzing the implications of George's decision, we gain a deeper understanding of the moral complexities that arise in challenging situations. Of Mice and Men serves as a reminder of the difficult choices individuals may be forced to make when faced with the responsibility of caring for others, especially in a world where survival is a constant struggle.
Bibliography:
Steinbeck, John. Of Mice and Men. Penguin Books, 1993.
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled