Why is Alexander The Great Bad

download print

About this sample

About this sample


Words: 533 |

Page: 1|

3 min read

Published: Jun 13, 2024

Words: 533|Page: 1|3 min read

Published: Jun 13, 2024

Table of contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Destructive Nature of His Campaigns
  3. Tyrannical Rule
  4. Cultural Homogenization
  5. Conclusion


Alexander the Great is often celebrated as one of history's most successful military commanders, whose conquests fundamentally shaped the ancient world. However, while his military prowess and strategic genius are indisputable, his actions and their consequences raise significant ethical concerns. This essay argues that Alexander the Great's legacy is tainted by the destructive and oppressive nature of his campaigns, his tyrannical rule, and the cultural homogenization that followed his conquests. By examining these aspects, we can better understand why Alexander the Great can be considered a negative historical figure.

'Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned'?

Destructive Nature of His Campaigns

Alexander's military campaigns were marked by extreme violence and widespread destruction. His conquests, which spanned from Greece to the borders of India, were not merely battles for territory but often resulted in the decimation of entire cities and populations. For instance, the siege of Tyre in 332 BCE involved the slaughter of thousands of inhabitants and the enslavement of many more. Similarly, the destruction of Persepolis, the ceremonial capital of the Persian Empire, was not just a strategic military action but an act of cultural vandalism. These acts of wanton destruction demonstrate a blatant disregard for human life and cultural heritage, painting Alexander as a ruthless conqueror rather than a heroic figure.

Tyrannical Rule

Alexander's governance style further underscores his tyrannical tendencies. Despite his initial portrayal as a liberator who sought to spread Greek culture, his rule was often characterized by autocratic control and suppression of dissent. After the assassination of his father, Philip II, Alexander swiftly eliminated potential rivals to secure his throne. Throughout his campaigns, he employed brutal tactics to maintain control over newly conquered territories, including the execution of political opponents and the establishment of puppet regimes. His methods of consolidating power were inherently oppressive, undermining the very ideals of freedom and democracy that classical Greek culture purportedly championed.

Cultural Homogenization

The cultural impact of Alexander's conquests is another point of contention. While some argue that his campaigns led to the spread of Greek culture and the creation of a Hellenistic world, this process often involved the erasure or subjugation of local traditions and identities. The policy of Hellenization, which aimed to impose Greek language, customs, and governance structures on conquered peoples, can be seen as a form of cultural imperialism. This homogenization not only suppressed diverse cultural expressions but also created long-lasting tensions and conflicts among different ethnic and cultural groups. The forced integration of disparate societies under a Hellenistic framework did not lead to a harmonious blend of cultures but rather to a legacy of cultural domination and resistance.

Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.


In conclusion, while Alexander the Great is frequently lauded for his military achievements and strategic acumen, a closer examination of his actions reveals a more complex and troubling legacy. His campaigns were marked by brutal violence and widespread destruction, his rule was characterized by tyranny and oppression, and his cultural policies often led to the erasure of local identities. These aspects of his legacy suggest that Alexander the Great should be viewed not as a heroic figure but as a conqueror whose actions had profoundly negative ethical implications. By critically assessing his impact, we can gain a more nuanced understanding of his place in history and the true cost of his conquests.

Image of Dr. Charlotte Jacobson
This essay was reviewed by
Dr. Charlotte Jacobson

Cite this Essay

Why Is Alexander The Great Bad. (2024, Jun 14). GradesFixer. Retrieved July 15, 2024, from
“Why Is Alexander The Great Bad.” GradesFixer, 14 Jun. 2024,
Why Is Alexander The Great Bad. [online]. Available at: <> [Accessed 15 Jul. 2024].
Why Is Alexander The Great Bad [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2024 Jun 14 [cited 2024 Jul 15]. Available from:
Keep in mind: This sample was shared by another student.
  • 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
  • Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours
Write my essay

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled


Where do you want us to send this sample?

    By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.


    Be careful. This essay is not unique

    This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

    Download this Sample

    Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts


    Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.



    Please check your inbox.

    We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!


    Get Your
    Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

    We can help you get a better grade and deliver your task on time!
    • Instructions Followed To The Letter
    • Deadlines Met At Every Stage
    • Unique And Plagiarism Free
    Order your paper now