Why Sixteen May Be Too Young to Cast a Ballot

The Paper frameworks different policy disagreements and arguments about lowering the voting age to Sixteen. I feel the opposite about bringing down the democratic age to 16. As I would see it, 16-year-olds are basically not prepared. They can participate in political exchanges or join an ideological group; in any case, the privilege to cast a ballot is excessively significant and too huge of an obligation to be practiced at 16 years old.

Many countries are choosing to lower their voting age. A few examples from a review by the U.S. central intelligence agency stated that Austria brought down the democratic age from 18 to 16 out of 2008. Ireland has permitted 16-year-olds to vote since 2012. These political groups have various thoughts on how society ought to be sorted out. These various thoughts are worked around what people value. In America, for instance, the Republican has different thought regarding what a well-working society looks and changed qualities they care about. it is the same in Ireland, so it is important to spend in a couple of more years developing a thought of what the government concentrates on supporting. Your thoughts on this can just completely create and develop through experiences which happen normally after some time, and which create as people develop in those two important years before adulthood. So, what are the cons of taking this across the nation?

I have heard individuals argue that the democratic age ought to be brought down to 16, while at the same time challenging that the ages for buying liquor and tobacco ought to be kept at 16 because drinking and smoking are unsafe uses. Be that as it may, on the off chance that you cannot trust a sixteen-year-old kid to settle on a serious healthcare decision all alone, why enable them to choose the eventual fate of the whole nation? how will they decide the future of the entire country?

When considering bringing down the democratic age, one must think about what is truly on the brains of adolescents around the nation: Prom, secondary school, companions… and voting? Generally, 16 and 17-year-olds are still kids living at home and going to classes. There is sufficient weight on them as of now. Just imagine the online flood of political promoting that they would face. Sixteen years old kid’s vote are likewise bound to be powerless to impact by their parents. Parents or teachers or someone close to this sixteen-year-old kid will tell you their opinion and this kid might have his own opinion too but knowing their opinion would be thought you changed your mind on that matter and especially as a 16 years old, this is going to be a very strong thing as you get older you learn to know what your own opinions all but for instance teachers in private schools perhaps maybe more to likely to be right-wing. So, you will get many more children who are in private school voting right-wing because all the surroundings are voting for the right-wing. They won't be able to know their minds and they won't be able to decide for themselves and not have someone else's opinion.

The way that individuals at 16-17-years of age don’t have the enthusiastic or mental development like someone who is 20-years old. Their brains are still excited and crazed with the synthetics of being a young person, because at age 16 many teens leave home for the first time, either for college or a job. So, they find themselves in front of the community that they do not know very well. And that makes it harder for them to find out about their new network's democratic rules, issues, and principles.

To conclude without a doubt not absurd to contend that people underneath a particular age are substantially less likely to be prepared to vote. They end up in a society and network they know nothing about. And that will make it firmer for them to recognize and differentiate between their new network's democratic principles and issues.