William M. Johnston: Some Causes of World War I and Historians' Taboos - A Critique: [Essay Example], 714 words GradesFixer
exit-popup-close

Haven't found the right essay?

Get an expert to write your essay!

exit-popup-print

Professional writers and researchers

exit-popup-quotes

Sources and citation are provided

exit-popup-clock

3 hour delivery

exit-popup-persone
close
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.

William M. Johnston: Some Causes of World War I and Historians' Taboos - A Critique

  • Category: History
  • Topic: Historians
  • Pages: 2
  • Words: 714
  • Published: 10 April 2019
  • Downloads: 14
Print Download now

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay.

We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

Get your price

121 writers online

blank-ico
Download PDF

Critical Analysis: Some Causes of World War I and Historians’ Taboos

Some Causes of World War I and Historians’ Taboos is a scholarly journal article written by William M. Johnston considering the ‘What if?’ on World War I. He observes the of how Vienna dealt with World War I along with its counterfactuals and how things would be differently if a certain variable were to be altered (Johnston 77-84). Johnston is wrong in his theories of how World War I could have been prevented, there are too many flaws in his ideas and too much information is submitted for it to be prevented entirely. This can be noted by looking at the other factors that contributed to World War I and through research on Johnston.

Johnston’s piece is an unorthodox article, examining the counterfactuals of World War I and how it could have been prevented. It looks at Archduke Ferdinand’s assassination and how variables could have been altered in order to prevent the war. Emperor Joseph deciding not to have a funeral ceremony for Ferdinand, the assassination not occurring, and family relations are all observed to see if they could have prevented the war (Johnston 78-80). If historians were to have looked at these counterfactuals in the past than we would have a better understanding of the past while it was still a big matter at hand. Unfortunately, the ‘What if’s?’ were not examined because of the unwritten taboo that counterfactuals and the fear of being known as a ‘conventional historian’ (Johnston 83-84).

Although Johnston presents a compelling argument, he has some errors in his ways. Johnston makes the variables of Archduke Ferdinand’s funeral sounds overly important, Ferdinand’s assassination by a Serbian terrorist is more important than his funeral because the assassination is what caused Austria to declare war on Serbia (Johnston 79-80). Two other major causes of World War I that he submitted are the rise of Nationalism and the increase of alliances. In the 1800’s nationalism, ‘the belief that loyalty to a person’s nation and its political and economic goals come before any other countries’’, became widely known (The Cause of WWI). Nationalism made European countries being weakened because national groups were fighting for independence and caused tension before the war between groups. It also stimulated support for military and its improvement so that the country could reach its goals. Alliances were formed around the world between different countries for a sense of security. Alliances could easily force a nation to war, normally winning because of the strength of the two nations that formed an alliance and would typically agree on matters, passing acts due to a majority vote. Other flaws come from Johnston himself and how his life influenced his work. Johnston does more studies in European history and has done pieces on Vienna, so it is likely that he would focus on the European factors more than other and make it seem more important (Faculty). Also by noting Johnston’s time period, late twentieth century, it is known that he did not witness the decision made by Emperor Franz Joseph to not have a funeral for Ferdinand, therefore he does not know that the reasoning was ‘personal dislike’ (Johnston 79). The last fault in Johnston’s work is that the ‘What if’s?’ are strictly just that, time cannot be turned back to test out these theories, meaning that it will never be known whether or not World War I could have been prevented with his theories.

In conclusion, William Johnston’s argument that World War I could have been prevented by altering factors concerning Archduke Ferdinand’s assassination is at fault. Other underlying factors are too major not to have caused the war even without the assassination. Johnston also allows his life impact his work by focusing too much on the European factors and not on the others, making them seem less important. Without knowing this, generations from the twentieth century on would believe that the World War I could have been prevented by one slight change. Further examination could be done to prove this by looking at Johnston’s other pieces of literature. Other investigation can be done to support Johnston’s work including the impact that the assassination had on the European citizens or through artifacts concerning Emperor Joseph.

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student.

Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

100% plagiarism free

Sources and citations are provided

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

GradesFixer. (2019, April, 10) William M. Johnston: Some Causes of World War I and Historians’ Taboos – A Critique. Retrived April 1, 2020, from https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/william-m-johnston-some-causes-of-world-war-i-and-historians-taboos-a-critique/
"William M. Johnston: Some Causes of World War I and Historians’ Taboos – A Critique." GradesFixer, 10 Apr. 2019, https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/william-m-johnston-some-causes-of-world-war-i-and-historians-taboos-a-critique/. Accessed 1 April 2020.
GradesFixer. 2019. William M. Johnston: Some Causes of World War I and Historians’ Taboos – A Critique., viewed 1 April 2020, <https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/william-m-johnston-some-causes-of-world-war-i-and-historians-taboos-a-critique/>
GradesFixer. William M. Johnston: Some Causes of World War I and Historians’ Taboos – A Critique. [Internet]. April 2019. [Accessed April 1, 2020]. Available from: https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/william-m-johnston-some-causes-of-world-war-i-and-historians-taboos-a-critique/
close

Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you’d like this or any other sample, we’ll happily email it to you.

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails.

close

Attention! this essay is not unique. You can get 100% plagiarism FREE essay in 30sec

Recieve 100% plagiarism-Free paper just for 4.99$ on email
get unique paper
*Public papers are open and may contain not unique content
download public sample
close

Sorry, we cannot unicalize this essay. You can order Unique paper and our professionals Rewrite it for you

close

Thanks!

Your essay sample has been sent.

Want us to write one just for you? We can custom edit this essay into an original, 100% plagiarism free essay.

thanks-icon Order now
boy

Hi there!

Are you interested in getting a customized paper?

Check it out!
Having trouble finding the perfect essay? We’ve got you covered. Hire a writer

GradesFixer.com uses cookies. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.