In What Sense Is Hamlet Wrong In His Plotting Against And Killing Of Claudius And In What Sense He Is Not?1

Hamlet's plotting against and killing of Claudius in William Shakespeare's play "Hamlet" raises complex moral, ethical, and psychological questions. On one hand, his actions can be deemed morally and legally wrong. Hamlet takes the role of judge, jury, and executioner, bypassing the established legal system and committing regicide – the murder of a king. This challenges the principles of justice, social order, and the rule of law.
Furthermore, Hamlet's plot involves deceit, manipulation, and the manipulation of others, such as Ophelia and Polonius, leading to their untimely deaths. His actions display a disregard for the consequences of his decisions on innocent lives, highlighting his moral blindness in his quest for vengeance.
However, from a psychological perspective, Hamlet's actions can be understood as a response to his overwhelming grief, confusion, and desire for revenge. His father's sudden death and his mother's hasty marriage to his uncle Claudius shake his understanding of the world, leading to his emotional turmoil. Hamlet's encounter with the ghost of his father sparks his mission to avenge his death, intensifying his internal struggle.
Hamlet's inaction and contemplation throughout the play can be seen as indicative of his moral hesitation and inner conflict. He grapples with the moral implications of taking a life, even that of his uncle who he believes murdered his father. This internal battle showcases his complexity as a character torn between duty and morality.
While Hamlet's actions against Claudius can be morally criticized, they can also be viewed as a product of the broader context of the play. The corruption within the Danish court, represented by Claudius's usurpation of the throne, further complicates the ethical landscape. Hamlet's role as a tragic hero battling against a morally ambiguous society adds depth to the discussion of right and wrong.