A Problem of Concussions Among Nfl Players

Introduction

Over the past two decades, the National Football League (NFL) has witnessed a tragic phenomenon with over 20 player suicides, including notable figures like Terry Long, Dave Duerson, and Junior Seau. The quest to establish a connection between these suicides and professional football has prompted an ongoing collaborative study by the Department of Veterans Affairs and Boston University. The startling findings from autopsies conducted on 87 out of 91 former NFL players (equivalent to 96%) have unequivocally revealed the presence of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE) in their brains. CTE, a degenerative neurological disease, is widely attributed to repetitive head trauma and has been associated with symptoms such as memory loss, depression, and dementia. These alarming statistics paint a grim picture of the long-term health consequences faced by NFL players due to multiple concussions sustained during their careers.

Acknowledging the gravity of the situation, the NFL, after years of denial, has finally conceded that concussions pose a serious problem. In response, the league has undertaken significant measures to enhance player safety and minimize head trauma. While progress has been made in reducing the number of player concussions, there remain substantial opportunities for further improvement. These encompass additional enhancements in concussion management policies, revisions to rules and regulations aimed at preventing direct head hits, and the incorporation of advanced helmet designs that can mitigate the force of impact. Each of these facets of development serves the dual purpose of protecting players from recurring head trauma and reducing the overall risk of concussions.

Historical Context and Cultural Transformation

Between 1994 and 2009, the NFL adopted a stance of outright denial, steadfastly asserting that there was no conclusive link between concussions sustained in the sport and the long-term health hazards faced by its players. The league regarded concussions as an inherent occupational risk for professional football players, dismissing the emerging scientific evidence regarding the grave implications of head injuries. This period of NFL denial coincided with a growing movement within the scientific community towards heightened concussion awareness, research, and understanding.

While concussion research was advancing, the NFL consistently rejected the legitimacy of emerging findings. A notable instance occurred in 2003 when Dr. Kevin Guskiewicz, a sports medicine researcher, published research suggesting that multiple concussions might result in a slower recovery of neurological functioning. In direct contrast, the NFL published its own study asserting that more than half of concussed players returned to play without symptoms within a single day. This marked one of several instances where the NFL's response contradicted the emerging concussion research.

It was only in 2010 that the NFL made a pivotal decision to assume responsibility for the health and safety of its players by acknowledging the gravity of concussions. Two key events prompted this transformation in the NFL's stance. First, numerous studies and data collections, following the suicides and deaths of former NFL players, presented increasingly irrefutable evidence linking CTE to every deceased player and demonstrating that retired players were 19 times more likely to suffer from conditions such as dementia, Alzheimer's, and depression. Second, starting in 2011, over 4,500 former NFL players initiated hundreds of lawsuits against the league, seeking substantial compensation for the enduring neurological effects incurred during their NFL careers. These legal actions accused the NFL of concealing the dangers of concussions and fraudulent management of players' head injuries.

The convergence of these events forced the NFL to reassess its previous resistance to concussion prevention. Consequently, the league embarked on a visible campaign aimed at improving player safety and reducing the risk of concussions. It provided substantial financial support to medical professionals engaged in concussion research, collaborated with helmet designers to explore impact reduction strategies, implemented league-wide concussion policies, established guidelines for safe return to play, revised rules and regulations to restrict head hits, and mandated player education regarding concussion risks. This marked a critical turning point in the NFL's approach to player safety and concussion prevention.

Stakeholders and Ethical Considerations

In any ethical dilemma, a complex web of stakeholders is invariably involved. In the context of the NFL's concussion issue, several key stakeholders come to the forefront, each with distinct interests and responsibilities. These stakeholders include the NFL itself, the individual teams, game officials, and the league's sponsors.

Team Stakeholders

Among the stakeholders, the teams hold a critical role, encompassing players, players' families, medical staff, and coaches. The players are at the epicenter of this issue, bearing the most direct impact. They are the ones subject to the repeated head trauma during games and practices, which can have long-term health repercussions. The players' families share in the burden, providing physical and emotional support through injuries and recovery processes. They also grapple with the later-life symptoms of concussions, such as dementia, memory loss, anger, and depression.

The medical staff and coaches play indispensable roles in the players' immediate health and safety on the field. They bear the responsibility of closely monitoring the well-being of every player and making informed, swift decisions regarding a player's ability to return to the game or practice. This dynamic places a substantial ethical burden on the medical staff and coaches, requiring them to prioritize player safety over competitive interests.

Instances of unethical behavior in response to injuries have been documented within the high-stakes, high-pressure environment of professional football. Barry Sanders, a former Detroit Lion, revealed that in the 1990s, concussion protocols were often left to the discretion of the players themselves. Players were asked questions like, "How do you feel today? Are you getting any better?" This self-reporting approach posed risks, especially for players eager to prove their toughness or job security. Teams must be vigilant in monitoring such situations to ensure that player health remains a paramount concern.

The NFL as a Stakeholder

The NFL emerges as a central stakeholder in this discourse due to the profound financial and ethical implications that concussions hold for the league. The players are not just athletes; they represent substantial investments for the NFL. When players are sidelined due to injuries, the league incurs financial losses, which can be substantial. Neglecting player safety opens the league to potential liability, as evidenced by recent concussion-related lawsuits alleging negligent care.

The NFL bears a weighty responsibility for the health and well-being of its players, both morally and legally. To mitigate risks and address ethical concerns, the league has the authority to enact policies, protocols, rule changes, and equipment requirements that all teams must adhere to. Prioritizing player safety is not only a moral imperative but also a strategic necessity. Public perception matters greatly, as growing concerns about the sport's safety could deter parents from allowing their children to participate, potentially jeopardizing the league's future.

Game Officials and Ethical Oversight

Game officials represent another crucial set of stakeholders in the NFL's concussion issue. They are entrusted with the responsibility of maintaining the safety of the game. This entails vigilant monitoring of every play, ensuring that dangerous actions do not go unpunished. Game officials must be impervious to external pressures from spectators or coaches, as their primary duty is to uphold the integrity of the sport and protect the players. Every call they make carries substantial ethical weight, as the safety of the players is directly at stake.

Manufacturers and Sponsors

Manufacturers and sponsors of the NFL are also deeply enmeshed in the league's concussion dilemma. They bear the responsibility of evaluating and certifying the safety and suitability of equipment used in the field of play. Collaborating with the league, they play a pivotal role in developing innovative equipment and technologies aimed at reducing injury risks for players. The safety and endorsement of their products have direct financial implications, as the more widely supported their offerings are, the greater their revenue potential.

In essence, the stakeholders in the NFL's concussion issue are entangled in a complex web of ethical considerations, ranging from player health and safety to the financial viability of the league itself. Each stakeholder must navigate these ethical waters with a sense of responsibility, recognizing that the well-being of players and the integrity of the sport must remain paramount. Balancing the competitive nature of the game with the imperative of player safety is a challenge that continues to shape the NFL's evolving response to the concussion issue.

Concussion Policy Advancements and Needed Refinements

The NFL took a significant stride in 2013 by introducing an official concussion policy. This policy marked a pivotal moment in the league's collective efforts to manage player safety, reduce the occurrence of concussions, and shield itself from further legal action. The NFL's concussion policy lays out explicit protocols for identifying, diagnosing, preventing, and managing concussions. These protocols encompass critical elements such as preseason concussion education training, baseline physical and neurological assessments for all players, and a standardized Sideline Concussion Assessment.

The baseline assessments hold particular significance as they empower clinicians to swiftly diagnose potential concussions during the season by providing immediate comparative data. The Sideline Concussion Assessment streamlines the evaluation process, ensuring consistency across teams and preventing differential treatment. It can also be administered multiple times to monitor a player's recovery progress.

Furthermore, the league now mandates the presence of an Unaffiliated Neurotrauma Consultant (UNC) at every game. The UNC plays a crucial role in sideline evaluations when a concussion is suspected, offering an unbiased perspective in identifying such cases. This additional layer of medical oversight enhances player safety on game days and increases the transparency of concussion evaluations, reducing the likelihood of missed concussions.

However, an essential clarification is warranted within the Concussion Policy: it should explicitly state that the UNC possesses sole authority to remove a player from the game when a concussion is suspected. Currently, the team doctor can overrule the UNC, retaining exclusive judgment in this decision-making process. This leaves room for undue influence from coaches and potentially exposes the league to liability concerns. To bolster the policy's integrity and player protection, this loophole must be closed, ensuring that medical professionals, free from external pressures, make the critical call regarding a player's continued participation.

Another critical aspect of the Concussion Policy revolves around the return-to-play protocol. Presently, the policy outlines five steps for progression, but it lacks a specified timeline. This absence of a defined timeframe poses a potential risk, as players could conceivably complete all steps within a single day. To address this issue, the NFL should institute a mandatory 24-hour waiting period between each step of the progression. This approach aligns with the International Concussion Consensus Guidelines, recognized and implemented by medical professionals worldwide. Consequently, completing the full protocol would take nearly a week before receiving clearance to return to play.

This timeline is essential in preventing players from progressing too quickly through the protocol, reducing the risk of sustaining another concussion before the initial one has fully healed. Such a precautionary measure could significantly diminish the long-term health consequences associated with repetitive head trauma. In essence, this refinement would prioritize player safety over expediency, aligning with the league's commitment to safeguarding its athletes' well-being.

In conclusion, while the NFL has made commendable strides in addressing the issue of concussions, there remains room for further enhancement and clarification within its Concussion Policy. These modifications not only bolster player safety but also serve to protect the league from potential legal ramifications. By closing existing loopholes, emphasizing unbiased medical judgment, and implementing a prescribed timeline for the return-to-play protocol, the NFL can continue its journey towards creating a safer environment for its athletes and securing the long-term viability of the sport.

Safer Rules and Regulations

The level of violent contact inherent in the sport of football has prompted the NFL to take significant measures to ensure the safety of its players. In addition to implementing more stringent concussion management policies for both practices and games, the league has actively restructured the rules of the game to provide better protection for its athletes. One notable rule change occurred in 2011 when the NFL adjusted the kick-off rule by moving the starting position five yards forward, with the intention of reducing the speed and intensity of collisions during kick-offs. Subsequently, more than 40 other rules have been enacted to mitigate dangerous hits, particularly those to the head, while still preserving the essence of football as a competitive contact sport.

Among these rule adjustments are regulations such as "The Defenseless Receiver," "Peel Back Blocks," "Chop Blocks," and the introduction of "Medical Timeouts." Each of these rules was implemented with the primary goal of enhancing player safety.

A significant innovation introduced during the 2015/2016 season is the concept of "Medical Timeouts." This rule change adds a third set of eyes to monitor players during games, alongside the on-field officials and the team's own medical staff. If both the team's medical personnel and the on-field officials fail to recognize a player displaying signs of disorientation and instability, the ATC's (Athletic Training Consultants) situated in the press box can initiate a "medical timeout." While the idea of stopping the game to assess a player's condition is a commendable safety precaution, its practical application and effectiveness remain to be seen.

Despite these rule adjustments, concussions and injuries continue to pose inherent risks in the game of football. However, there has been measurable success since the implementation of rules aimed at limiting helmet-to-helmet hits and head contact. In the NFL's 2014 Injury Data Report, it was revealed that concussions resulting from helmet-to-helmet hits had decreased by a significant 43% from 2012 to 2014.

As the league continues its commitment to player safety, the next logical step could involve refining the "defenseless receiver" rule by adding the verbiage "if the defender is going for the ball." This adjustment would afford defenders greater flexibility to make plays on the ball without endangering the receiver, striking a balance between safety and competitiveness.

It is undeniable that football is a violent sport, and the injuries sustained while playing it can be career-ending and life-altering. Recognizing the indispensability of its players, the NFL is diligently working to safeguard their well-being on the field. While concerns exist that the league may be diluting the sport's physicality with these rule changes, it is incumbent upon the NFL to prioritize player safety, regardless of public opinion. The league has shifted its stance from reluctance to proactive rule changes, all with the overarching goal of reducing the risk of concussions and injuries for its athletes. In doing so, it seeks to preserve the integrity of the sport while providing a safer environment for its players.

Advancements in Helmet Technology and Ongoing Safety Measures

The NFL has continually evolved its approach to equipment and protective gear to enhance player safety over the years. Striking a balance between player protection and maintaining the essence of the sport remains a challenge. Manufacturers have employed innovative techniques to produce smarter, more contemporary helmet models, underscoring the league's commitment to player well-being. Helmets, originally introduced in the 1900s to prevent skull fractures and subdural hematomas, have undergone substantial transformations over the past century. They have evolved from leather to the first hard plastic design in 1939, with recent models aimed at addressing the risk of concussions.

While many scientists and professionals working with the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE) have acknowledged that creating a concussion-proof helmet is unlikely, extensive efforts have been made to understand the forces and impact levels that can lead to these injuries. NOCSAE, a non-profit organization headquartered in Kansas City, sets the testing standards for helmets. Manufacturers must have licensing agreements with NOCSAE to certify helmets based on compliance with these standards. Each year, the NFL sends a selection of helmets to NOCSAE for evaluation against these criteria. Helmets that pass muster and are used by NFL players must be regularly updated over several years. This step was necessitated when the NFL realized that many players were still using older helmet models during a period when concussion concerns were at their peak.

To address the ongoing dilemma of minimizing concussion risk while preserving the contact nature of the sport, the NFL has explored various strategies. The league has engaged in extensive discussions with helmet manufacturers and NOCSAE about incorporating impact sensors into helmets. These sensors would provide scientific data on the types of hits players experience during games, enabling a more informed approach to injury prevention. While the NFL cannot entirely eliminate concussions from football, it has taken significant steps to regulate the issue.

In a notable move, the NFL donated $30 million to the National Institute of Health (NIH) in 2012 to advance research into brain injuries. This investment demonstrates the league's commitment to advancing scientific understanding of these complex issues. In the past, the NFL faltered in addressing concussion concerns, but it has since acknowledged the importance of discussing, analyzing, and tackling this issue head-on. By actively communicating ongoing changes and improvements to its employees and affiliates, the league underscores its dedication to player safety and the continued evolution of the sport.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the alarming number of former NFL players facing mental health challenges, including suicide, has prompted the league to reevaluate the impact of head trauma on its athletes. Football is inherently a collision sport, with each play likened to driving a car at 35 miles per hour into a cement wall. With an average of 80 plays per game, the cumulative effect takes a toll on players' bodies.

Acknowledging the physical demands of the sport, the NFL has taken concrete steps towards player safety. In addition to the substantial financial contribution to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the league initiated the "Heads Up Program," which focuses on teaching better tackling techniques to protect players' heads. The NFL is actively engaged in community outreach, offering clinics where youth coaches learn proper tackling methods and how to minimize the risk of injuries. Furthermore, the league has altered game rules to discourage dangerous hits, particularly those that leave players vulnerable.

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell's statement underscores the league's commitment to advancing the game while ensuring player safety. The league acknowledges that the medical community should lead the discussion on the link between football and injuries, and it has invested in scientific research to address this concern. While football will always carry inherent risks due to its contact nature, the NFL's dedication to enhancing safety is evident in its concussion management protocol, stricter return-to-play guidelines, and continual rule changes. Additionally, the league's collaboration with helmet manufacturers and ongoing funding for technology research aims to reduce impacts leading to concussions. These multifaceted reforms have already shown promising results, with a 36% decrease in in-season game concussions reported from 2012 to 2014. The NFL's resolute stance on concussion management reflects its unwavering commitment to player safety, but only time will reveal the endurance of this vision amidst the physicality of the game.

References

1. Bailes, J. E., & Petraglia, A. L. (2014). Omalu, Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy, and the National Football League. Neurosurgery, 75(4), 399-403.
2. McCrory, P., Meeuwisse, W., Dvorak, J., Aubry, M., Bailes, J., Broglio, S., ... & Schamasch, P. (2017). Consensus statement on concussion in sport—the 5th international conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, October 2016. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 51(11), 838-847.
3. Comstock, R. D., & Currie, D. W. (2014). Concussion reporting, knowledge, and attitudes among U. S. high school athletes: a preliminary study. Journal of Athletic Training, 49(5), 659-665.
4. Guskiewicz, K. M., Marshall, S. W., Bailes, J., McCrea, M., Cantu, R. C., Randolph, C., & Jordan, B. D. (2005). Association between recurrent concussion and late-life cognitive impairment in retired professional football players. Neurosurgery, 57(4), 719-726.
5. NFL. (2019). NFL concussion protocol: A detailed explanation. Retrieved from https://operations.nfl.com/the-players/health-and-safety/player-health-and-safety/
6. NFL. (2020). NFL rules, policies and guidelines. Retrieved from https://operations.nfl.com/football-ops/league-policies/
7. National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE). (2020). About NOCSAE. Retrieved from https://nocsae.org/about-nocsae/