Advantages of Eliminating Tyranny in Human History

When a nation had refugees who attempted to escape, or the orphans who grew up with adolescence in different races and cultures, commonly we would think it is important to eliminate the bureaucratic elements of the governance. For the main reason behind the political philosophy, we upheld the contemporary belief that it is the act of civilisation to release the weak and the less oppressed from painfulness and inequality. Eventually, we found “tyranny” as the best description for the results of dictatorship and labours oppression, which created the negligence of unequal distribution of wealth and resources in the disadvantaged group of every nations. While it remains controversial whether part of the elements of tyranny should be preserved as a political mean in the essay the pros of completely cancelling the established extreme political strategies and inhumanity laws will be examined.

In a realistic view, the main features of utilitarianism and authoritarianism should be eliminated as the principles are conservative and corruptive. Some supporters suggest that the cancellation of tyranny can create a peaceful political atmosphere and successfully remove fascism, in which a more civilised political society can be formed. On the other hand, some politicians hold the strong belief that only be strict law enforcement can ensure strong obedience of labours in the lowest part of the hierarchy. 

My first argument is based on the positive impacts that the deletion of despotic rule and tyranny have brought to the improved political environment in the global political stage.“Tyranny” firstly drew my attention to the unhumanistic acts by Hilter and previous western history. The oppression of labours, the deprivation in freedom of speech and the centralisation of wealth in the more privileged have been long existing in this contemporary world globally. In the meanwhile, the representatives of an “institution” or an “association” then stand up and followed by an inspirational and revolutionary speech on behalf of a group of labours. This implies that the policy of benevolence can give the poor a new opportunity to fight for their fundamental human rights that they deserved to have. Snyder’s publication reinforced the critical thoughts that it is an important lesson to rethink where do freedom come from and it highlighted that how the bureaucracy of institutions may limit the improvement in transforming the old and conservative values into the universally-acceptable principles. Instead of being enforced to obey with the dictatorship, we reserve our personal power to express our disagreements towards the policy-makings and decisions of distribution in social welfare of a nation or even an alliance. Upon the surface, a formal institution can be the cornerstone that provides guidelines and written regulations for us to fight for the democracy and saves us from the darkness.

A more revolutionary thought is to remove our disagreed institutions by ourselves and recreate a new republic by setting up an example for others to follow. If Martin Luther King did not give his speech titled “I have a dream”, our ancestors could have wasted more time to search for the meaning of life. I can firmly say that the old generations may not realise that they own the rights to change the stereotypical thoughts into a new wave of thoughts and even stronger power to establish more transparent and humanistic governance. The diminishing tyranny in the world had saved numerous unprivileged and rekindle the hopes of the oppressed and the poor to be protected under a safety net. Supported by Snyder, we can find a trustworthy or we can highly defend the authorized political parties, which the defending act towards institutions can create a new political philosophy. We, as a human being all have equal rights to restate our political standpoints if we have reasonable judgements and substantial evidence to convince. It is believed that, if there is a group of people with willingness to remove the traditional and bureaucratic thoughts, then we can be rescued from the non-sense and corruptive dictatorship.That’s the initial step for us to kick away the out-dated principles and being able to look things by a completely different lens. To walk out from the sophisticated framework that we to a large extent rely on, we are able to explore with more opportunities to develop new dimensions of thoughts by accumulation of previous histories over hundreds of decades.

To end up, the advanced advantage of pulling down the dictatorship is the maintenance of a more equitable working environment and a more guaranteed equality in different races. When the black has been struggling hard to fight with the discrimination over their race and their dialect,the discrepancies between the black and the white still exists under the privileges that the white can always owe. The same application can be put into the setting of a concentration camp of Nazi Germany and today’s fierce business environment, which looks for relatively cheap labours that fits the cost-effectiveness.