By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
About this sample
About this sample
Words: 921 |
Pages: 2|
5 min read
Published: Jun 13, 2024
Words: 921|Pages: 2|5 min read
Published: Jun 13, 2024
Yusef Komunyakaa served as a journalist in the Army during the Vietnam War. He later explained in interviews that his training and career in the Army had a fundamental influence on his development as a poet. Komunyakaa’s work has been associated with recurring themes regarding violence and the use of camouflage. Hostage was one of two books of poetry that enabled Komunyakaa to develop a "powerful and disturbing voice from the war." In the poems included in his collection Dien Cai Dau, his work strongly focuses on themes of violence and war, as well as the use of camouflage tactics, which is represented in "Camouflaging the Chimera." On the topic of genre, some critics have claimed that Komunyakaa does not work exclusively within one genre; rather, some critics argue that he utilizes both fiction and poetry genres. Therefore, the trickster’s portrayal found in "Camouflaging the Chimera" is part of an exploration to uncover and create the poet’s self.
This study analyzes Yusef Komunyakaa’s poem "Camouflaging the Chimera" from four critical perspectives: feminist theory, gender theory, form criticism, and mythological criticism. It explores the connections between these perspectives and examines how the speaker or poet identifies societal victims using the mask of the chimera. The poem also represents the Vietnam War as a means to conceal the speaker's true identity. The mythological chimera is used to convey the metaphorical significance of a trickster revealing true identity.
Yusef Komunyakaa was born in Bogalusa, Louisiana. His years in the American South and his experiences as a soldier in the Vietnam War have continued to exert a formative influence on his poetry. Komunyakaa's poetry is characterized by a precise observation of the physical world and a historical perspective that is enlivened by the use of Southern speech in a variety of meters and rhyme schemes. The rhythms he uses are indebted to the blues and jazz, as much as to the English literary traditions, and he is often seen as an heir of Robert Hayden, Gwendolyn Brooks, and Langston Hughes, as well as of the New York School poets such as Frank O'Hara.
Komunyakaa's poetry reflects his military service in Vietnam and has been praised for its transcendent language. Critics highlight his mixed ethnic heritage expressed in his work. He has written a poetry guide and interviews on his writing's roots and development. He has received numerous prestigious awards including Pushcart Prizes and the William Faulkner Prize. His multicultural background enables him to tell unheard stories of various ethnicities and reintroduce the newest flavor of Southerner into world literature.
Yusef Komunyakaa adopts a narrative style in "Camouflaging the Chimera," revealing the complexities of identity and the personal turmoil and politics that inform these conflicts. The poem is composed of a single, 48-line stanza without a consistent rhyme scheme and initially maintains a muted, somber mood. Yet, the imagery is surprisingly vivid and sensuous despite the despair present in the speaker's world. The poem's setting is a battle site somewhere in the southeast that is inhabited by armadillos and where "there's a dead dog / unraveling a bloody coil." The soldier speaker describes encounters with children, fleeing women, and describes a "sudden stomping in the leaves" as, "the chasm's pulse in the mountain." The speaker also recalls more mundane experiences, such as a night spent in pens talking to his buddies or when he worked the hoist and, he, "watched the moss-covered / stones weight far below the lattice." He also details the loss of another man and a bad bout of fever.
The poem's somber, mournful mood is disrupted dramatically when the speaker begins to meditate on his changing appearance. According to the speaker, when he was seventeen years old, he "looked in the mirrors," and saw a person who looked like him and who was, "touched / by the dumbness of long riverbeds / and the quiet in them." After being shipped overseas, though, the soldier claims to have "become a beast," a creature he describes in various ways, including as a "hip-roofed barn," a "driver," a hoist for flagstones, and a worm. His vision of himself as a beast reaches its apotheosis when he includes the speakers who crap on these stalls, roost in a niche in the barn. The beast to which he is most closely affiliated is a chimeric creature composed of many animals, including a lower half of a lion, tiger, or hind. The hydra's troubled attitude is his to keep beneath his snaky hair and through his teeth.
In "Camouflaging the Chimera," the speaker embarks on an examination of identity as seen in a fractured mirror during a time of war. He speaks of the war and the organic ways war destroys the collage of personalities that have met inside him, marking and recording it on the physical, bodily plane. The lines are marked between self and other, private and public, national or ethnic. There is no space in this poem that is not charged by warfare; no space that is not a warfront.
The artist, Christlike in his creation of the poem, is unfathomable even to the reader just as embedded in the painting, the subject himself is by the jungle foliage. One identity tries to penetrate the other. The personality itself—whether viewed from the outside or the inside—has become jungle, an intermixture of parodic but genuine animals and plants and memories, so that the inside and the outside do not know themselves as one. War changes both the outside and the inside, the public and the private. So the poem is a jungle on the page. It declares its identity, dissembles what may be its true self, and, thereby, declares another identity – or is it several? Is the scene a peaceable kingdom, an animal paradise? Awareness of war intrudes, reversing the poem to what it said before, or to something totally different altogether.
The poem’s titles intertwine with its cord of themes to create the "speaking" woven body of the poem. Yet, the intercultural is what becomes wounded with it. The landscape is not a landscape. It is unmemed, made uniform, designed to enhance its climactic effect and the military’s occupation of it.
Developing a subjective and psychological exploration of the concerns of 'Camouflaging the Chimera' takes a discussion of identity and self-perception as a starting point. This attachment to identity is a general theme in Komunyakaa's poetry, with a notable consistency in the problem concerning his portrayal of the suffering of those who serve in the army of Vietnam. Soldiers suffer an emotional (and perhaps a spiritual or existential) wounding whose deep and abiding pain is responsible for a number of psychological ramifications, including an inability to forgive themselves, their government, or the enemy, thwarting both their ability to function and their ability to conform to society's expectations. This seems particularly true in poetry about being a Black soldier, 'Camouflaging the Chimera,' even though it makes no explicit reference to Vietnam.
'Camouflaging the Chimera' also contains a sense of this duality of existence, which is embedded in personal and social history. Komunyakaa's darkly unfaltering metaphorical imagery reveals the psychological and spiritual effects of warfare, both destroying life and recreating it. The progress of the poem exhibits the effect of such psychological reshaping on the detractors and makes striking statements about the military and human camouflage. The very word 'camouflaging' in the title contains the notion of contradiction, while evocative of hiding and blending in, also contains a cabalistic secret, which needs to be fleshed out and hidden away. A study of the poetry of Komunyakaa suggests that his concern about identity and the resistance from the lonely, soulful 'I' has been a consistent preoccupation.
Yusef Komunyakaa’s poem, "Camouflaging the Chimera," is a complex piece of writing, covering an array of themes. War and conflict are the two foci in the poem, stretched through the entirety of the creative piece. As the exploration of this piece will reveal, the poem’s interest in both topics comes from an awareness of conflict on several levels. There is the brutal reality of what occurs in war, and later in the poem, the question of the war’s morality comes to attention. The imagery used by the poet is composed primarily around the physical effects of battle, both on the ground and on the soldiers themselves. The aftermath of war is portrayed with images of death, injury, and what has to be done with the soldiers who have died. Finally, "Camouflaging the Chimera" seems to be critiquing the concept of war itself, not just the conflicts that it represents.
Conflict and war are obviously the two main themes of the poem, evident in every aspect of the writing from the title to the selection of diction. The piece is rich in imagery that points to the effect of conflict on the land and the human psyche, capturing the surreal quality of guerrilla warfare and the response to it by aircraft and the landscape. Moving onward, though, readers are also shown the effects of the conflict on the American troops stationed in Vietnam, working to clear out the airport. The initial reactions to death by the soldiers were right on par with the realities of guerrilla warfare. Conflict has a way of numbing the senses, and it is not until they see it as a problem of practicality – one soldier mentions the "narcotic tar" in order to hide dead troops – that the person behind the death really hits home. Aesthetic and verbal choices made by Komunyakaa further that interpretation throughout the poem. The sounds and sights of a surreal battlefield do not allow for heightened scrutiny because the entire time spent under fire is a kind of altered reality. Environmental images are used to convey the beauty of the country and the grotesquery of what happens to it in war. Animal imagery is also used in a related way. In a flashback of sorts at the end, Komunyakaa talks about carrying body bags, which have been painted with "the swept-wing face of a chopper, floating down in heated, mirrored paddy fields." It is a grim depiction indeed, to see an inanimate object in place of such a gentle being patrolling, and in a place where few of those who died served. The effect of such grotesque paradoxes and images is a deep disillusionment, which is essentially defined by the conflict setting the poem is dealing with.
While delving into the key thematic crux of "Camouflaging the Chimera" is indeed an integral part of a rich interpretation, this poem is particularly notable for the extensive use of evocative imagery and symbolism to produce a plurality of readings and experiences. The poem's evocative connections to nature transfer "concrete human duties" onto the landscape to form a plea for human interconnectivity. This plethoric imagery provides a more multilayered experience within the poem, for any number of momentary conjurations to latch upon, and allows for more thematic complications and enrichments than a summary could provide.
There is a tension between the imagery perceived as military, violent, and the free, associative imagery that is more focused on nature. Throughout, the image that most stands out is the aforementioned chimeric body. The image of a chimeric body is the most compelling in the poem. This exchange of nomenclature promotes the idea that a chimeric existence is a choice, challenging readers to consider the reality of the green camouflage. Faux chameleon properties may be the poet's mask worn in reverse—not to hide the soldier from nature, but the natural world from the soldier. The ultimately dissonant imagery in this poem supplies a deep sense of revulsion to readers, but not without attraction. By circling so tightly around boy, nature, and death, such horrific, essentially untranslatable images tangle into a meaningful confusion within the reader, complex, heavy, and still.
In Yusef Komunyakaa's poem, the chimera becomes a metaphor that embodies a multifaceted chase for the self. It suggests that both this-worldly monsters and heavenly beauty are reality. One can choose between bestiality and sublimity. It suggests that we, in particular—that humanity in general—are deceivers, someone who cheats the public and cheats oneself in return. The real versus the illusory is a theme. Who is the self, who will create an identity apart from the actual self within their consciousness, and then endeavor to honestly present that consciousness outwardly? What is the mirror, though—a true looking glass, or a reflection of the self that one wants to recognize, airbrush trickery and all?
Seen as a metaphor of the divided self, the chimera's significance is essentially existential. A "chimera" implies a cool wash, a false airbrush to hide anxiousness. The chimera likewise functions like an epistemological and perceptual invitation. Always vulnerable to the cuts and wounds we have received merely adopting to a culture encoded in our blood, one last query affirms this chimera's significance: Who am I, and what is actual, since I have to convolute the air around me for an honest sense perception? The fragmented, indeed abnormal, main body parts or "subparts of the body" invite an analysis of their meaning in terms of the very concrete reality of the war experience. The whole head receives beautiful treatment in the present stanza as it calls matter normally seen as incongruous fodder for the ground in the deep subconscious for the Chimera's system as a search for spoor to a believable "photograph." When the speaker submits the peculiar luster of the eyes to the camouflage, one gets the feeling that an air suffused with shades of magenta, the color of change, predominates within. The "heart" of the word "meekness." The true implication of "heart" literally encloses the eye's deltoidal "echo" within oneself.
It stagnates of "hidden beauty," since "meekness" is not merely hiding: it is a concealed beauty. The chimney burns in a "human" hidden. One should perceive these organs as related in a meshing footrace. In order to so perceive them, read their own correlation to the war experience.
In "Camouflaging the Chimera," vivid military and nature imagery convey the contrast between their dispositions and their interconnectedness. The vivid imagery associated with warfare evokes every sense and, in doing so, brings the reader into the harsh reality of war. The military imagery is central to the tone of the poem; it creates dark overtones that tug at the readers' emotions. It is full of specifics that convey a life of struggle and a discourse of suffering. The nature imagery seems to be a respite from the harshness of the military images. It plays a different tune from the military. While the military images paint the environment around the protagonists as destroyed and decimated, the nature imagery presents a world of vibrant butterflies, sweet smells, and bright colors, singing songs and lighting candles. This makes an interesting contrast between the paintings and adds an emotional quotient to them.
Military or war images are realistic representations of human suffering when someone undergoes violence. In this poem, this genre of images creates a melancholy mood, playing discordant tunes. Images of nature, in contrast, represent growth, healing, and perseverance, and these correspond to the texture and strength of the tapestry. Nature symbolizes life. Its extravagance and profusion give natural nourishment and strength to man. In this poem, the green forest and foliage suggest that life will continue when man is no longer around. In conclusion, the above analysis traces the aspect of trauma in the poem in a broader way as common to us. The poem isn't about each one, but about what goes on in a microcosm in any war environment.
In the poem, the poet uses various devices to create a beautiful piece. One of the first uses is alliteration: in line two, there is repetition of the consonant "m" at the beginning of two words. In an example of assonance, there is "Arms and legs," this time with the repetition of "a" at the beginning of the first word and at the end of the second. The repetition of the sounds contributes to the lyrical quality.
Another effect that the repetition of sounds has in the poem is to create a rhythm. There are moments in the poem when the rhythm speeds up, such as in line twelve, where the commas contribute to the fast pace, as the reader is exhorted to simply "run." One of the ways the poet achieves rhythm is through the use of language, such as using both end-stopped lines and enjambment to manipulate the reader. Caesura can direct the reader on how to read lines, particularly as the most powerful lines are end-stopped. This affects how the poem is read as much as the sound created by the rhythm does. Enjambment is another tool that the poet uses to create a sense of movement, particularly in lines twenty-two and twenty-three. The activity in the poem mimics the subject as if to unsettle the reader, particularly with the enjambment. Stanza four contains total enjambment to demonstrate the speaker's traumatized state as he, out of being fired at by enmity, is transformed gruesomely into a metallic monster. Stanzas three and five, on the other hand, consist only of end-stopped lines to emphasize, respectively, the multi-faceted nature of the identity crisis and the impossibility of resolving the conflict behind it. Even cautious identification of the speaker's sense of self could result in alienating and being alienated by his surroundings.
Through the use of caesura, end-stopped lines, and a lot of enjambment, the poet further foregrounds the speaker unable to reconcile his experience of war and his reconstruction through wartime trauma.
The poem is a musical display. It makes use of both meter and rhyme and does so in part through the use of alliteration. Alliteration means the consecutive repetition of similar beginning consonant sounds. This can create a sense of rhythm and can also create a sense of a musical term within the noises of the lines. For instance, "Instead, I'm ready now" is constructed with four I sounds. This draws these words together in terms of their sound. When I read it aloud, I am likely to give those sounds prominence, as though I were reading in meter. This effect is especially helpful in this poem because, as the poem's conclusion emphasizes, he does not "want a whiskey." Alliteration deploys I sounds four times—twice on "I don't," a third time with "Instead," and a fourth time with "I'm ready." This gives the whole stanza a deep sense of irony that makes it all the more heart-wrenching. The noise in the words emphasizes that they are a lie.
One other sound element in the poem reaches worthwhile attention. This is the acoustical analogue to alliteration: assonance. Technically speaking, it's the repetition of a vowel sound without the repetition of a consonant that begins the word. When combined, assonance and alliteration become, in many ways, inseparable. The poem indeed uses them in much the same way. There seems no need for a word for this particular technique simply because the sounds integrate so closely. The most powerful use of assonance is the pervasive use of a long O sound. Assonance is particularly effective in developing a feeling or atmosphere behind lines of text. The assonance creates a slow, melancholy sound to what we read. It draws out the reading experience as those sounds last longer in the mind. The entire feeling of the poem is drawn out by the atmosphere created through this sound technique.
Enjambment creates a momentum in a poem by letting the thought or the image spill into the next line. It links the lines together and produces continuity or an illusion of continuity. This, however, does not make the poem easier to read. In fact, it might make it more difficult, as there could be a lot to take in and there may be a kind of urgency that sustains the momentum. Caesura, on the other hand, may create a deliberate pause in the middle of the line, making the reader or the listener stop and reflect on what has just been read or wait for the continuation. In this poem, and in contrast to those that practice caesura, enjambment appears to be the dominant structuring device. However, the juxtaposition of this technique with caesura has powerful effects. The use of enjambment can foster chaos, anemia, and the idea of being less than whole, and caesura is depicted as the act of placing an inhibitor on an object, usually a biological entity, and how this act creates trauma and an extreme oscillation into a psychic field of traumas.
This tension arising from the interplay of enjambment and caesura can bring about ambiguous readability, which means, in the context of phenomenological reading, that it invites the reader to look back at language as an object rather than just as a tool that carries communication from one mind to another. It is necessary to distinguish between enjambment and caesura while taking part in a discussion about language as the object of poetry. The long sentences with words interrupting the performance foster a reading of the poem using the tools that are used when one needs to solve a complex equation. The poem leads to a lot of sentences that begin with "and," interrupting it with "while," "as," and "and," forcing the reader to be betrayed by the illusion of sequences that grow into crisscrossing lines of temporal spirals. This highlights the way interrupted sentences act to showcase inversions of meanings in words and poetry, which create a caustic and molecular temporality. This helps to create a shift between the literal and the figurative.
Yusef Komunyakaa powerfully delves into the matter of identity and self-regard in his poem. He intertwines the themes of war and conflicts with personal revaluation and engagement in Komunyakaa's lyrical narrative. The prolonged visual text of this poem, correlation to a rolling stream or wildfire, presses for impermanence and insubstantiality. The mixing of imaginary amorphousness makes metamorphosis sites the lyrical object in its confidence on engagement with a person's self spaces of being. The camouflage and chimeras serve a sort of interactive relationship in the rhythm of this poem. The images in the text of the poem compromise the flow of rhythms and imagery as they pass by confounding the reader at times. The figure of Dante's Beatrice is finely updated with a criminal bust of trash. Her pose as the angel of crypt patrolling the traits/rifts identifies the perspective or focal point of situation and identity in the figure of the language stream as it runs, the poetry.
In this connection, poetic punctuation serves to make a caesura in motion, stopping short either as an explanatory retaining within the frame of language the activity of its assertion or as a break of sorts in the figuration laid out.
This poetry is full of suspended contingencies. There are images and figures of language that are confusing and interconnected. Similes act as intermediaries, catching glimpses of fragments and engaging in recurrent rhymes. Each image flows into the next. The poem is always evolving, never fully put away. It embodies the essence of time. It combines literal trash and identity, transforming them into something graceful. It begins anew, circulating and circulating. The errors and deviations from the norm become the rhyme. They suffocate and stop, but always start again. The poetic engagement combines the chimerical and the momentum. It emblematizes and mimics disaster. The ghost, the chimerical, is connected to a reasoned skin, oscillating and infracting the prosody. The poem consumes and regurgitates thoughts. It simultaneously evokes both disgust and attraction.
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled