An Argument Against The Idea of Expanding The Ncaa Basketball Tournament

About this sample

About this sample


Words: 625 |

Page: 1|

4 min read

Published: Dec 11, 2018

Words: 625|Page: 1|4 min read

Published: Dec 11, 2018

There is a debate on whether the NCAA basketball tournament should be expanded, contracted or left the same. In making our decisions, we need to make sure that we do the whole lot of possible things to understanding ourselves and what the future would hold for basketball tournaments. This essay is an explanation of my stance against the idea that the NCAA basketball tournament should be expanded. It also elaborates my standpoint against the thought that a major league player who uses steroids on baseball need to be acceptable into the hall of fame.

'Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned'?

We should not expand the NCAA basketball tournament since the competition is perfect in its present state. The number of teams should not be added. Expanding the number of teams would be like aiming a fire horse at a glass of Dom. It would make it dilute beyond recognition. Implementing the decision of expanding the teams would just ruin the basketball tournament.

Coaches may push for the idea of the basketball tournament to be expanded for their hidden agenda. They love expansion since it gives them an easier path to the tournament. With an increase in the number of tournament appearance, the coaches will be sure of job security and that is their happiness. Players on the other side would get an opportunity to extend their seasons. But from a practical standpoint, the existing format in the tournament is nearly flawless. What is perfect should not be interfered with, and there is no need to use a jackhammer when a small chisel would do.

On the financial side, the NCAA should always sell high, not low. The NCAA needs to understand the value of its product, wait until the economic timing is right and also consult financial experts. Expanding the tournament would be like deciding to offer one of a kind oceanfront property on the cheap.

A major league player who apparently uses steroids or bets on baseball should not be allowed into the hall of fame. First of all, they should follow the baseball rules that may allow them for reinstatement after some time. The major league players should not be allowed into the hall of fame until they spend some time outside the tournaments. Spending time outside the hall of fame would allow them to rehabilitate and learn to work with the rules governing baseball game. In case the league players fail to apply for reinstatement after the designated period, they should forever not be allowed into the hall of fame for failure to operate under instructions.

Being involved in the use of steroids or bets is an activity that stains the game and the major league players involved must not be allowed into the hall of fame. They must be able to live with the consequences of their acts. In fact, the major league players should voluntarily withdraw to avoid further punishment. The major league players who are proved to be engaged in the use of steroids or bets should be banned from the hall of fame so as to uphold the integrity of the game. The major league players who have been banned for life from the hall of fame will act as an example to other players who most probably will fear getting involved in the activities. The banning will therefore, play a crucial role in putting on integrity in the game.

Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.

In conclusion, an expanded tournament would dilute the achievements of national champions. Moreover, there is nothing not to love about the current version of the sport. The basketball game has a set of rules that every player has to observe. The rules must be followed by every player despite their position in the league and upon breaking the law; the law must be followed without fear or favor.

Image of Dr. Oliver Johnson
This essay was reviewed by
Dr. Oliver Johnson

Cite this Essay

An Argument Against the Idea of Expanding the NCAA Basketball Tournament. (2018, October 26). GradesFixer. Retrieved February 21, 2024, from
“An Argument Against the Idea of Expanding the NCAA Basketball Tournament.” GradesFixer, 26 Oct. 2018,
An Argument Against the Idea of Expanding the NCAA Basketball Tournament. [online]. Available at: <> [Accessed 21 Feb. 2024].
An Argument Against the Idea of Expanding the NCAA Basketball Tournament [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2018 Oct 26 [cited 2024 Feb 21]. Available from:
Keep in mind: This sample was shared by another student.
  • 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
  • Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours
Write my essay

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled


Where do you want us to send this sample?

    By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.


    Be careful. This essay is not unique

    This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

    Download this Sample

    Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts


    Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.



    Please check your inbox.

    We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!


    Get Your
    Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

    We can help you get a better grade and deliver your task on time!
    • Instructions Followed To The Letter
    • Deadlines Met At Every Stage
    • Unique And Plagiarism Free
    Order your paper now