Through the bias of placement, one can assume this story is quite important, as the New York Times has given it a front-page portion. The headline is very straightforward but does hint at a bias upon deeper examination: "Despite Concussions, Boxing Is Still Required for Military Cadets." The phrase "still required" suggests that boxing should no longer be mandatory, yet this remains a relatively unbiased headline in my opinion. A better alternative might be "Military Boxing Causes Concussions." The pictures are well taken from interesting bird’s eye and head-on angles, providing the reader with excellent visuals without displaying any bias from the writer or cameraman’s ideology. Regarding titles, the story employs professional militaristic titles for each individual, thereby not revealing any bias-related titles.
Say no to plagiarism.
Get a tailor-made essay on
'An Examination of The Non-bias Story on Boxing for Military Cadets'
A Review of the Unbiased Narrative on Boxing for Military Cadets
The numbers the story portrays do show bias; it reports that the Air Force had 72 reported concussions. However, it fails to mention the total number of attendees at the Air Force. If there are 100,000 attendees, the number would be insignificant, whereas if there are only 100, then 72 out of 100 being afflicted is significant. The piece also broadens its information gathering by interviewing many different people. It presents both sides: concussions as a necessity to prepare troops for ground combat, and as a potential long-lasting injury and pain for individuals who may not even benefit from boxing knowledge. I don’t recognize any assumptions the writer makes without proper information.
The writer is composing for the New York Times, so the audience is vast, with readers from almost every part of the world and every culture. There isn’t anything in the article that could offend anyone. The portrayal of people in the story is also not offensive and remains fact-based. The writer avoids crossing any political lines, which can be challenging when writing about the military. The sense I get from the piece is that boxing is an unfortunate necessity for preparing individuals in the army for war. The story does a commendable job of remaining unbiased. This balanced approach helps foster a more nuanced understanding of the complexities involved in military training, where the objective is to ensure readiness while minimizing harm.
