This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.

Analysis of Treatment Decisions for a Child with ADHD

downloadDownload printPrint

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay.

We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

Get your price

121 writers online

Download PDF


Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a psychiatric disorder mostly affecting children in preschool, grades, adults, and even adults. Its symptoms are low persistent attention and high hyperactivity and impulsivity. It is a sort of behavioral issue that has gotten generous mindfulness in both the school and research settings because of its presumable unfavorable impacts on scholastic items and study hall working. The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) approximates that its frequency rate is somewhere in the range of 3% and 10%, with ADHD affecting around 2 million youngsters in the United States. ADHD is typically co-sullen with other mental issue including, depression and tension issue, drug abuse, lead issue, and withdrawn practices.

Kids with untreated ADHD have higher than regular rates of mishaps and damage (NIMH). Pharmacotherapy treatment for ADHD incorporates Stimulant and Non-stimulant medications. Stimulant medication includes dextroamphetamine, Focalin, and Methylphenidate while non-stimulant medications include Guanfacine, Clonidine, and atomoxetine. This paper examines treatment decisions for an 8-year old girl with ADHD while considering the legal and ethical implications of the treatment.

Decision #1

The first decision is administering a chewable Ritalin-methylphenidate every morning, which is a stimulant medicine. This medication helps in boosting dopamine and nor ephedrine actions in some brain regions such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia to enhance awakened, attention, concentration, hyperactivity, and executive function. Ritalin also helps in boosting mental performance. It is among the firs-line treatments for ADHD, and it is one of the best stimulant drugs in this treatment used over the last 60 years. Ritalin works faster and has lesser side effects in the majority of patients compared to other medications.

At the underlying stage, the patient ought not to be set on a high oral dose. The patient is started at less measurements, which diminishes the opportunity of symptoms. This will likewise allow the medical practitioner to continue evaluating her reaction to it, and choose if the measurement ought to be expanded, diminished, or changed to another medication totally either in light of symptoms or for not having any restorative impact on the patient. Wellbutrin then again was not chosen because of various reasons. First, it has not been endorsed by the FDA for the treatment of ADHD. Secondly, it includes different antidepressants which have been connected to self-destructive ideation in youngsters and teenagers, and their Safety and viability have not been built up. There aren’t sufficient logical examinations to back up its adequacy and security in treating ADHD. Ritalin is FDA permitted for ADHD in both children and adults. Ritalin is widely and lengthily studied and found to be safe. It has been used in about 200 clinical trials and treated over 6,000 patients and found the best for children and adolescents.

Expected Outcome

The expected outcome is the reduction of symptoms such as inattentiveness, impulsiveness, and hyperactivity, which affects the normal functioning of the patient. The administration of the stimulant will also show the patient’s response as well as improve her attention and concentration in class. Generally, the patient is expected to improve within the first doses. The girl will not be easily distracted, and her retention of information will be enhanced. Consequently, improvement is expected in her classwork in the ability to spell and read as well as in arithmetic. No side effects are expected.

Difference Between the Expected Outcome and the Actual Outcome

There was no much difference between the expected and the actual results. Improvement was observed but did not last long, and side effects were reported. The result of using Ritalin indicates unmistakably how it is compelling in the first part of the day, which implies that the supplier should choose how to address the evening conduct issues with the drug and the tachycardia.

By the four weeks appointment, the girl’s teacher reported that she was getting better. Her symptoms were suppressed in the morning, which improved her academic performance. By noon, the girl would lose concentration, and she started complaining of a funny feeling in the heart. On assessment, her pulse was 130bpm. This was likely a side effect of Ritalin as it increases norepinephrine peripherally, which can cause autonomic side effects such as, tachycardia, hypertension, tremor, and cardiac arrhythmias.

Decision #2

The second decision was Ritalin LA 20 mg orally every morning.


In the first decision, the IR formula had setbacks as it was effective in the morning, but ADHD symptoms come back as the day progresses. The first decision also had side effects. For those reasons, the medic needed to do something. There was a need to switch formula of the same medication for it to act longer until the day is over. The experience with stimulant medications is the way they convey a successful portion over a required timeframe. At the point when Ritalin was first used to treat ADHD in 1961, it kept going three or four hours. However, innovation has been made to make the drug discharge bit by bit, cresting at the ideal time. Ritalin IR is immediately retained, with its activity starting inside 30 minutes of utilization, enduring just for around two to four hours before it gets in (Durand-Rivera et al. 2015). Continued discharge Ritalin LA has an early pinnacle and an 8 hours length of activity.

Ritalin LA likewise has dabs. However, they’re 50-50, which means a large portion of the dots will be discharged promptly, to the top in the first part of the day, the other half toward the evening, for an aggregate of six to eight hours. To have substantially more of a two-equivalent stages impact on center and consideration (Ehmke, 2018). An observational investigation had a goal to assess the adequacy of Ritalin LA in kids with ADHD, and It exhibited upgrades in ADHD side effects, affirmed generally speaking great decency and security, and uncovered a more extended apparent impact especially in the wake of changing from prompt discharge definitions.

If the side effects are encountered, it is better to switch to another formulation. Using the same formula and waiting for reevaluation after 4weeks would be inappropriate. This would cause continued side effects. The best option is to improve the dosage rather than change the drug. Dosage starts at 10 mg a day and can be improved weekly by 5 to 10 mg a day and should not go beyond 30 mg a day.

Expected Outcome

In the course of the four weeks, the patient should have experienced improved attention throughout the day and reduction in tachycardia. There is also an expected outcome that the day dreaming and loss of attention will improve. Improvement in her classwork should have improved, and her heart rate decreased to a normal rate of 70-110 beats per minute.

Difference between the expected outcome and the actual outcome

The patient returned in about four weeks and reported that the change to the LA arrangement is enduring her all through the school day. This brought along improved classwork. No reports of her gazing into space and wandering off in fantasy land not at all like when she was on the Ritalin IR. Moreover, the past report of her heart feeling funny has ceased. On evaluation during this visit, her heartbeat of 130 had reduced to 92 beats per minute, which is a good range for her age. It is clear that her reaction in the four weeks after her prescription was changed was essentially positive; it keeps her regularly working all through a school day, not at all like some time ago where it must be seen in the first part of the day. There was an association between the normal outcomes and real outcome for this customer.

Decision #3

The final decision was to continue using Ritalin LA 20 mg and have her assessed in four weeks.


The patient continued showing improvement with this treatment, and therefore, no change was necessary. This medication showed no side effects. As mentioned earlier changes are only necessary when the current medication shows no improvement. For this case, the patient has reached an optimal clinical effect and therefore, no reason for change. However, the client has to be reassessed periodically.

Expected outcome

The expected outcome that during the next visits after four weeks, the patient would report improvement. It is expected that she continues improving with no symptoms or side effects.

The Difference in Expected Results and the Actual Results

There is additionally no compelling reason to get an EKG for this customer since her pulse is suitable for her age. Ritalin LA 20 mg has shown constructive outcome in settling the customer’s manifestations. She has kept on appearing generally speaking improvement in her manifestations and henceforth, there is no motivation to change the measurement or change to another drug.

Keeping up a similar dosage and measurements under the required remedy from the wellbeing expert is a superior decision. She ought to likewise always be assessed for reactions. Since Ritalin could incidentally moderate typical development in kids, her weight and stature ought to be always observed. Her pulse and circulatory strain ought to similarly be observed consistently. The customer’s parent ought to likewise be encouraged to abstain from dosing late in the day on account of the danger of a sleeping disorder (Stahl, 2014b).

Ethical Considerations

Ethically, the provider must prescribe a suitable dose and monitor improvements as well as the side effects that may be improved. There’s a challenge that by not permitting guardians and parents of the kids to utilize these meds when determined to have consideration shortfall hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the mental and medicinal networks would be infringing upon the rule of independence. Equity also would be manhandled since most of the weight of dealing with all of the indications brought about by this issue would plunge on those with ADHD and moderately on their families (Meppelink et al. 2016). There has been some discussion over the usage of stimulant meds and exploitative works on including youngsters. A couple of individuals have used stimulants as a sort of social control, endeavoring to crash socially prohibited practices by controlling the tyke’s gatekeeper into having stimulants suggested. It is essential that the tyke’s parent fathoms the side effects and proper use of stimulant remedies.


There are various medications that can help manage ADHD by reducing hyperactivity, impulsiveness, and increasing attention and focus. The aim of the medications is to attain optimal effect and reduce the risks of the symptoms. There is no single treatment that is good for all clients in all situations and therefore, to boost treatment, the medic must listen to the patient, assess them, and administer a tailored treatment for every patient.


  1. Abassi, L. (2015). Chewable Ritalin for the Kiddies. Retrieved from
  2. Coffey, C. (2016). Pediatric neuropsychiatry. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkinsg
  3. Durand-Rivera, A., Alatorre-Miguel, E., Zambrano-Sánchez, E., & Reyes-Legorreta, C. (2015). Methylphenidate Efficacy: Immediate versus Extended Release at Short Term in Mexican Children with ADHD Assessed by Conners Scale and EEG. Neurology Research International, 2015, 1-9. doi:10.1155/2015/207801
  4. Ehmke, R. (2018). The Facts on ADHD Medications. Retrieved from
  5. Haertling, F., Mueller, B., & Bilke-Hentsch, O. (2014). Effectiveness and safety of a long-acting, once-daily, two-phase release formulation of methylphenidate (Ritalin ® LA) in school children under daily practice conditions. Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorders, 7(2), 157-64.
  6. Huss, M., Duhan, P., Gandhi, P., Chen, C., Spannhuth, C., & Kumar, V. (2017). Methylphenidate dose optimization for ADHD treatment: review of safety, efficacy, and clinical necessity. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, Volume 13, 1741-1751. doi:10.2147/ndt.s130444
  7. Johns, G. (1994). Treatment with Stimulant Medication as an Ethical Choice for Children Diagnosed With Attention Deficit Disorder/Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. National Student Speech Language Hearing Association, 21, 45-49.
  8. Laureate Education (2016d). Case study: A young Caucasian girl with ADHD [Interactive media file]. Baltimore, MD: Author
  9. Low, K. (2018). Medications to Treat ADHD in Children and Adults. Retrieved from
  10. Meppelink, R., de Bruin, E. I., & Bögels, S. M. (2016). Meditation or Medication? Mindfulness training versus medication in the treatment of childhood ADHD: a randomized controlled trial. BMC psychiatry, 16, 267. doi:10.1186/s12888-016-0978-3
  11. Methylphenidate Chewable Tablets – FDA prescribing information, side effects and uses. (2018). Retrieved from
  12. Once-daily treatment of ADHD with guanfacine: patient implications. (2008). Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 4(3), 499-506.
  13. Stahl, S. M. (2014b). The prescriber’s guide (5th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

infoRemember: This is just a sample from a fellow student.

Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

100% plagiarism-free

Sources and citations are provided

Find Free Essays

We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Analysis Of Treatment Decisions For A Child With ADHD. (2021, March 18). GradesFixer. Retrieved July 24, 2021, from
“Analysis Of Treatment Decisions For A Child With ADHD.” GradesFixer, 18 Mar. 2021,
Analysis Of Treatment Decisions For A Child With ADHD. [online]. Available at: <> [Accessed 24 Jul. 2021].
Analysis Of Treatment Decisions For A Child With ADHD [Internet]. GradesFixer. 2021 Mar 18 [cited 2021 Jul 24]. Available from:
copy to clipboard

Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you’d like this or any other sample, we’ll happily email it to you.

    By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails.


    Attention! This essay is not unique. You can get a 100% Plagiarism-FREE one in 30 sec

    Receive a 100% plagiarism-free essay on your email just for $4.99
    get unique paper
    *Public papers are open and may contain not unique content
    download public sample

    Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.



    Your essay sample has been sent.

    Want us to write one just for you? We can custom edit this essay into an original, 100% plagiarism free essay.

    thanks-icon Order now

    Hi there!

    Are you interested in getting a customized paper?

    Check it out!
    Having trouble finding the perfect essay? We’ve got you covered. Hire a writer

    Haven't found the right essay?

    Get an expert to write you the one you need!


    Professional writers and researchers


    Sources and citation are provided


    3 hour delivery