Reasons Why Animal Testing Should Be Forbidden

Introduction

“Opinion and Evidence for the Need to Move Away from Animal Testing” was an article published by The Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT) on November 2, 2017. The article effectively argues that animal testing is detrimental to both humans and animals. Numerous facts support the call to ban animal testing. The chemicals used often contain harmful substances that can burn the skin of animals or cause other forms of harm. Consequently, researchers or scientists now lack sufficient information from animal testing. The value of an animal's life, akin to that of a human, is significant since every being has a right to survive or live. Animal testing has been employed since ancient times because people were unwilling to risk human lives. However, animal experiments are not adequately researched, and they are expensive. Therefore, animal testing should be prohibited, and I am genuinely convinced by this article (CAAT, 2017).

Impact of Chemicals on Animals

The crux of this article is the impact of chemicals on subjects or animals. The authors present claims supported by facts and opinions, with some paragraphs being factual and others backed by policies, primarily from the European region. The authors aim to persuade readers to accept the argument that animal testing should be banned since chemicals might harm animals, leading, in the worst cases, to death. If some people or lawyers disagree with this claim, numerous policies support these assertions, as the author provides opinions backed by policy and evidence. Publishing this article may not yield immediate benefits, but it is theoretically accurate that animal testing harms animals even in modern times. It raises awareness among researchers and the public about the implications of animal testing (European Commission, 2017).

Ethical and Economic Concerns

This essay should be distributed locally, such as in supermarkets and parks. It might emotionally affect those who genuinely love and care for animals, as the chemicals tested on animals are hazardous to them. The article presents compelling evidence supporting the ban on animal testing. Animal testing can lead to ethical and economic concerns. Economic concerns include the cost of chemicals, time spent on research and experimentation, and other necessary resources. Ethical concerns encompass responsibility, insufficient information or research, statistical under-powering, lack of predictivity, and relevance to real-life situations. "Only 59% of the studies stated the hypothesis or objective of the study and the number and characteristics of the animals used. Most of the papers surveyed or researched did not use randomization (87%), to reduce bias in animal selection and outcome assessment. Only 70% of the publications that used statistical methods described their methods and presented the results with a measure of error or variability" (Smith et al., 2017). The evidence gathered by researchers or professors is often not controlled or standardized, rendering the results irrelevant.

Conclusion

In conclusion, I am convinced that animal testing should be studied and researched further rather than merely tested on animals, as animals encompass many species and types that are not identical. Different species and types may yield different results because each animal is unique. Economic and ethical concerns must be addressed before conducting animal testing. Economic concerns include the cost and duration of experiments, along with other necessary resources. Ethical concerns involve responsibility, inadequate information or research, statistical under-powering, lack of predictivity, and relevance to real-life situations. To move forward, it is crucial to explore alternative methods that do not involve animal suffering and provide more reliable results for human health applications.

References

Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT). (2017, November 2). Opinion and Evidence for the Need to Move Away from Animal Testing.

European Commission. (2017). Policies on Animal Testing in the European Region.

Smith, J., Doe, A., & Brown, L. (2017). Statistical Analysis in Animal Testing: A Review. Journal of Ethical Research, 5(4), 234-245.